FROG vs GTLB vs FIG Stock Comparison

JFrog, Gitlab and Figma Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FIS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FROG JFrog Ltd
$88.49 -7.3% 1M +83.3% 1Y
Market cap
$10.43B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$599.96M
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
2 wins
GTLB Gitlab Inc.
$52.37 +5.2% 1M +2.6% 1Y
Market cap
$8.81B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
4 wins
FIG Figma, Inc.
$21.05 -1.5% 1M -56.3% 1Y
Market cap
$11.62B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.28B
Div. yield
–
Creative Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Gitlab leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Gitlab 4, Figma 2, JFrog 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFROGGTLBFIGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.43B $8.81B $11.62B FIG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -236.5x -167.2x -7.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 94.1x 58.2x 75.2x GTLB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.4% +23.0% +43.4% FIG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -7.3% -5.0% -123.1% GTLB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +83.3% +2.6% -56.3% FROG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +20.1%/yr -15.2%/yr — FROG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.9% 59.8% 74.9% GTLB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 67/100 25/100 GTLB

Percentile Scorecard

FROGGTLBFIG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFROGGTLBFIG
Valuation 40 #75 of 124 53 #59 of 124 4 #28 of 29
Growth 80 #24 of 114 81 #22 of 114 22 #22 of 28
Profitability 57 #48 of 111 61 #44 of 111 8 #25 of 27
Financial Health 72 #37 of 128 67 #43 of 128 83 #6 of 31
Shareholder Returns 44 #41 of 73 71 #22 of 73 10 #20 of 22
Overall 59 67 25
  • FROG ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GTLB ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FIG ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFROGGTLBFIGSPY
1 month -7.3%+5.2%-1.5% -2.0%
3 months +2.6%+43.6%-22.3% -2.2%
6 months +62.6%+110.8%+8.4% +4.2%
Year to date +41.7%+39.5%-43.7% +10.6%
1 year +83.3%+2.6%-56.3% +10.4%
3 years +229.8%+23.6%— +73.6%
3 years, per year +48.9%+7.3%— +20.2%
5 years +149.6%-56.0%— +61.6%
5 years, per year +20.1%-15.2%— +10.1%

Risk

MeasureFROGGTLBFIGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.9%59.8%74.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.8%60.5%70.1% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.450.960.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.100.04-0.75 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.6%-85.2%-86.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.9%-9.7%-56.3% -3.2%
52-week high $104.03$57.97$48.17 $779.14
52-week low $34.75$19.42$16.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFROGGTLBFIG
P/E now vs peer median -244.6xmedian 38.8x -167.7xmedian 38.8x -7.0xmedian 33.6x
P/S now vs peer median 18.1xmedian 4.4x 8.2xmedian 4.4x 8.7xmedian 2.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -215.2xmedian 28.6x -281.9xmedian 28.6x -6.2xmedian 12.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 64.2xmedian 23.6x 40.7xmedian 23.6x 48.1xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 3.1x 9.0xmedian 3.1x 7.6xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -10.39median 1.27 -4.55median 1.27 —median 0.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFROGGTLBFIG
Revenue $599.96M $1.06B $1.28B
Gross profit $467.14M $904.84M $1.01B
Operating income -$69.09M -$90.20M -$1.59B
Net income -$44.07M -$54.73M -$1.58B
Free cash flow $169.70M $213.67M $232.31M
R&D $210.17M $304.14M $1.22B
EPS (diluted) $-0.36 $-0.31 $-2.99
Cash & equivalents $96.69M $226.49M $445.85M
Shares (diluted) 121.82M 168.70M 527.46M
Enterprise value $7.50B $3.73B $5.08B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBFIG
P/E -244.6x -167.7x -7.0x
P/FCF 64.2x 40.7x 48.1x
P/Operating cash flow 61.8x 39.0x 44.8x
P/S 18.1x 8.2x 8.7x
P/B 11.3x 9.0x 7.6x
P/Tangible book 11.7x 9.0x 7.6x
EV/EBITDA -215.2x -281.9x -6.2x
EV/EBIT -145.7x -82.5x -6.0x
EV/Revenue 16.8x 7.1x 7.4x
EV/FCF 59.3x 34.8x 40.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 57.1x 33.3x 38.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -10.39 -4.55 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBFIG
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.4% 23.0% 43.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 24.3% 28.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 30.3% 19.1% 25.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.4% 26.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.7% 10.7% -3,538%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.6% 25.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 48.9% -405.1% -1,116%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.0% 34.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 51.7% -470.3% -856.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.5% 36.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 24.4% 433.4% -15.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 84.6% 310.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 22.3% 496.3% -20.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 89.2% 1,057% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBFIG
Gross margin 77.9% 85.8% 79.1%
EBITDA margin -7.8% -2.5% -120.3%
Operating margin -11.5% -8.5% -123.8%
Pretax margin -6.8% -4.7% -122.0%
Net margin -7.3% -5.0% -123.1%
FCF margin 28.3% 20.3% 18.1%
Operating cash flow margin 29.4% 21.2% 19.5%
Return on equity -4.7% -5.4% -107.5%
Return on assets -3.1% -3.2% -68.0%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -7.2% -8.8% -104.8%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -4.0x -4.1x -0.2x
Stock comp / revenue 26.8% 21.8% 130.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBFIG
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 35.5% 41.5% 37.1%
Equity / assets 64.5% 58.5% 62.9%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.1x 2.4x 2.5x
Quick ratio 2.0x 2.3x 2.3x
Cash ratio 1.7x 1.9x 2.1x
Altman Z-score 12.63 7.63 5.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBFIG
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.2% 1.4% -5.3%
Shareholder yield -0.2% 1.4% -5.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFROGGTLBFIG
Forward P/E 94.1xFY2026 58.2xFY2026 75.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.94FY2026 $0.90FY2026 $0.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.6%FY2026 -6.2%FY2026 -37.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.0% +21.1% +21.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $669.83MFY2026 $1.08BFY2026 $1.43BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.9%FY2026 +12.6%FY2026 +35.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.1% +16.3% +34.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFROGGTLBFIG
Held by institutions 92.7% 95.7% 81.2%
Institutions holding 411 398 375
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.1% +4.9% +12.2%
Institutions buying 252 231 258
Institutions selling 116 123 64
Buyers to sellers 2.17 1.88 4.03

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FROGGTLBFIG
FROG 1.00 0.50 0.33
GTLB 0.50 1.00 0.51
FIG 0.33 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FROG, GTLB and FIG?

Figma (FIG) is the largest by market capitalisation: JFrog (FROG) $10.43B, Gitlab (GTLB) $8.81B, Figma (FIG) $11.62B.

Which company is growing faster?

Figma (FIG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: JFrog (FROG) +26.4%, Gitlab (GTLB) +23.0%, Figma (FIG) +43.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Gitlab (GTLB) has the highest net margin (JFrog (FROG) -7.3%, Gitlab (GTLB) -5.0%, Figma (FIG) -123.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year JFrog (FROG) returned the most: JFrog (FROG) +83.3%, Gitlab (GTLB) +2.6%, Figma (FIG) -56.3%. Over five years, JFrog (FROG) compounded fastest (JFrog (FROG) +20.1%/yr, Gitlab (GTLB) -15.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Gitlab (GTLB) has been the steadiest (JFrog (FROG) 75.9%, Gitlab (GTLB) 59.8%, Figma (FIG) 74.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FROG, GTLB and FIG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gitlab (GTLB) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.