FROG vs GTLB vs AVGO Stock Comparison

JFrog, Gitlab and Broadcom Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (U) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FROG JFrog Ltd
$100.47 +13.1% 1M +99.9% 1Y
Market cap
$12.03B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$599.96M
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
1 win
GTLB Gitlab Inc.
$57.97 +25.4% 1M +20.2% 1Y
Market cap
$9.47B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
1 win
AVGO Broadcom Inc.
$351.81 +0.6% 1M -5.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.64T
P/E
42.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$89.10B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Broadcom leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Broadcom 6, JFrog 1, Gitlab 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFROGGTLBAVGOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.03B $9.47B $1.64T AVGO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -272.9x -179.8x 42.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 106.9x 64.4x 32.0x AVGO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.4% +23.0% +48.7% AVGO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -7.3% -5.0% 42.9% AVGO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 26.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.7x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +99.9% +20.2% -5.7% FROG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +25.2%/yr -12.4%/yr +46.0%/yr AVGO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.1% 59.7% 46.4% AVGO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 68/100 65/100 GTLB

Percentile Scorecard

FROGGTLBAVGO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFROGGTLBAVGO
Valuation 41 #74 of 124 51 #61 of 124 44 #53 of 94
Growth 80 #24 of 113 83 #20 of 113 92 #8 of 92
Profitability 59 #45 of 109 63 #41 of 109 94 #6 of 90
Financial Health 71 #37 of 127 68 #41 of 127 34 #66 of 99
Shareholder Returns 48 #33 of 63 73 #18 of 63 60 #30 of 73
Overall 60 68 65
  • FROG ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GTLB ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • AVGO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFROGGTLBAVGOSPY
1 month +13.1%+25.4%+0.6% +0.9%
3 months +37.1%+70.3%-5.0% +5.9%
6 months +117.1%+164.6%-13.2% +8.5%
Year to date +60.9%+54.5%+1.6% +13.3%
1 year +99.9%+20.2%-5.7% +12.4%
3 years +367.3%+37.2%+319.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +67.2%+11.1%+61.3% +23.5%
5 years +207.3%-48.3%+561.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year +25.2%-12.4%+46.0% +11.0%
10 years ——+1,978.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——+35.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFROGGTLBAVGOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.1%59.7%46.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 71.4%60.1%48.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.390.922.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.330.34-0.12 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.6%-85.2%-41.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.4%0.0%-26.9% -0.9%
52-week high $104.03$57.97$481.57 $779.14
52-week low $34.75$19.42$293.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFROGGTLBAVGO
P/E now vs peer median -277.7xmedian 37.9x -185.6xmedian 37.9x 43.8xmedian 46.0x
P/S now vs peer median 20.6xmedian 4.4x 9.1xmedian 4.4x 18.8xmedian 7.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -246.8xmedian 34.5x -317.1xmedian 34.5x 33.1xmedian 28.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 72.8xmedian 26.6x 45.1xmedian 26.6x 42.6xmedian 41.4x
P/B now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 3.4x 9.9xmedian 3.4x 16.8xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median -11.80median 1.24 -5.03median 1.24 1.29median 2.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFROGGTLBAVGO
Revenue $599.96M $1.06B $89.10B
Gross profit $467.14M $904.84M $61.28B
Operating income -$69.09M -$90.20M $42.81B
Net income -$44.07M -$54.73M $38.27B
Free cash flow $169.70M $213.67M $39.40B
R&D $210.17M $304.14M $11.84B
EPS (diluted) $-0.36 $-0.31 $7.83
Cash & equivalents $96.69M $226.49M $23.98B
Total debt – – $59.42B
Shares (diluted) 121.82M 168.70M 4.89B
Enterprise value $9.11B $4.39B $1.57T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBAVGO
P/E -277.7x -185.6x 43.8x
P/FCF 72.8x 45.1x 42.6x
P/Operating cash flow 70.1x 43.1x 41.3x
P/S 20.6x 9.1x 18.8x
P/B 12.9x 9.9x 16.8x
P/Tangible book 13.3x 10.0x 22.9x
EV/EBITDA -246.8x -317.1x 33.1x
EV/EBIT -167.0x -92.9x 40.1x
EV/Revenue 19.2x 7.9x 19.2x
EV/FCF 68.0x 39.2x 43.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 65.5x 37.5x 42.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -11.80 -5.03 1.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBAVGO
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.4% 23.0% 48.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 24.3% 28.1% 36.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 30.3% 19.1% 53.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.4% 26.7% 36.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.7% 10.7% 89.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.6% 25.2% 39.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 48.9% -405.1% 102.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.0% 34.8% 40.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 51.7% -470.3% 101.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.5% 36.9% 34.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 24.4% 433.4% 59.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 84.6% 310.4% 31.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 22.3% 496.3% 58.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 89.2% 1,057% 31.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBAVGO
Gross margin 77.9% 85.8% 68.8%
EBITDA margin -7.8% -2.5% 58.2%
Operating margin -11.5% -8.5% 48.0%
Pretax margin -6.8% -4.7% 45.4%
Net margin -7.3% -5.0% 42.9%
FCF margin 28.3% 20.3% 44.2%
Operating cash flow margin 29.4% 21.2% 45.6%
Return on equity -4.7% -5.4% 40.8%
Return on assets -3.1% -3.2% 20.8%
Return on invested capital – – 26.0%
Return on capital employed -7.2% -8.8% 26.3%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -4.0x -4.1x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 26.8% 21.8% 9.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBAVGO
Debt / assets – – 31.6%
Debt / equity – – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.7x
Debt / FCF – – 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 35.5% 41.5% 47.0%
Equity / assets 64.5% 58.5% 53.0%
Interest coverage – – 13.7x
Current ratio 2.1x 2.4x 2.5x
Quick ratio 2.0x 2.3x 2.2x
Cash ratio 1.7x 1.9x 1.2x
Altman Z-score 14.30 8.44 12.98

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBAVGO
Dividend yield – – 0.7%
Net buyback yield -0.2% 1.3% 0.5%
Shareholder yield -0.2% 1.3% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFROGGTLBAVGO
Forward P/E 106.9xFY2026 64.4xFY2026 32.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.94FY2026 $0.90FY2026 $11.01FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.6%FY2026 -6.2%FY2026 +61.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.0% +21.1% +68.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $669.83MFY2026 $1.08BFY2026 $102.00BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.9%FY2026 +12.6%FY2026 +59.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.1% +16.3% +61.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFROGGTLBAVGO
Held by institutions 92.7% 95.7% 78.1%
Institutions holding 409 396 4,799
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.1% +4.9% +3.7%
Institutions buying 252 231 2,638
Institutions selling 116 121 1,842
Buyers to sellers 2.17 1.91 1.43

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FROGGTLBAVGO
FROG 1.00 0.50 0.19
GTLB 0.50 1.00 0.09
AVGO 0.19 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FROG, GTLB and AVGO?

Broadcom (AVGO) is the largest by market capitalisation: JFrog (FROG) $12.03B, Gitlab (GTLB) $9.47B, Broadcom (AVGO) $1.64T.

Which company is growing faster?

Broadcom (AVGO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: JFrog (FROG) +26.4%, Gitlab (GTLB) +23.0%, Broadcom (AVGO) +48.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Broadcom (AVGO) has the highest net margin (JFrog (FROG) -7.3%, Gitlab (GTLB) -5.0%, Broadcom (AVGO) 42.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year JFrog (FROG) returned the most: JFrog (FROG) +99.9%, Gitlab (GTLB) +20.2%, Broadcom (AVGO) -5.7%. Over five years, Broadcom (AVGO) compounded fastest (JFrog (FROG) +25.2%/yr, Gitlab (GTLB) -12.4%/yr, Broadcom (AVGO) +46.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Broadcom (AVGO) has been the steadiest (JFrog (FROG) 75.1%, Gitlab (GTLB) 59.7%, Broadcom (AVGO) 46.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FROG, GTLB and AVGO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Broadcom (AVGO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.