FRFHF vs ACT vs AFL Stock Comparison

Fairfax Financial Holdings, Enact Holdings and Aflac Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ACT Enact Holdings, Inc.
$48.29 +2.8% 1M +31.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.67B
P/E
9.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.25B
Div. yield
1.86%
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
4 wins
AFL Aflac Inc
$120.93 +6.3% 1M +12.8% 1Y
Market cap
$60.74B
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.07B
Div. yield
1.99%
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Aflac leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Aflac 4, Enact Holdings 4, Fairfax Financial Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFRFHFACTAFLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $53.71B $6.67B $60.74B AFL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.6x 9.9x 12.5x FRFHF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.7x 10.6x 16.6x FRFHF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.0% +2.5% +10.9% AFL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.7% 54.5% 26.9% ACT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 9.6% -2.7% ACT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.85% 1.86% 1.99% AFL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.0% +31.7% +12.8% ACT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +34.2%/yr +16.0%/yr +16.7%/yr FRFHF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 22.6% 23.1% 17.6% AFL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 61/100 43/100 ACT

Percentile Scorecard

FRFHFACTAFL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFRFHFACTAFL
Valuation 41 #71 of 119 35 #78 of 119 14 #103 of 119
Growth 37 #73 of 115 10 #104 of 115 39 #71 of 115
Profitability 29 #81 of 113 91 #11 of 113 44 #64 of 113
Financial Health 78 #26 of 114 82 #21 of 114 35 #74 of 114
Shareholder Returns 16 #90 of 107 85 #17 of 107 86 #16 of 107
Overall 40 61 43
  • FRFHF ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • ACT ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • AFL ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFRFHFACTAFLSPY
1 month +12.1%+2.8%+6.3% -0.8%
3 months +4.9%+2.5%-4.5% +3.5%
6 months +2.1%+9.9%+5.4% +7.0%
Year to date -7.3%+21.8%+9.7% +12.2%
1 year +7.0%+31.7%+12.8% +13.0%
3 years +118.7%+79.9%+58.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +29.8%+21.6%+16.5% +23.1%
5 years +334.4%+110.0%+115.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year +34.2%+16.0%+16.7% +11.0%
10 years +234.4%—+246.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year +12.8%—+13.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFRFHFACTAFLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 22.6%23.1%17.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.9%23.0%17.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.24-0.06-0.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.311.370.73 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -20.9%-21.9%-20.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.7%-3.6%-6.6% -1.8%
52-week high $1,916.53$50.07$129.53 $779.14
52-week low $1,529.40$34.93$105.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFRFHFACTAFL
P/E now vs peer median 7.6xmedian 10.6x 9.9xmedian 10.6x 12.5xmedian 10.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.4x 5.3xmedian 1.4x 3.4xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 7.6x —median 7.6x —median 7.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2,066xmedian 8.6x 9.3xmedian 8.6x 22.9xmedian 8.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.5x 1.2xmedian 1.5x 2.0xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 5.66median 0.52 1.91median 0.52 1.93median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFRFHFACTAFL
Revenue $134.78B $1.25B $18.07B
Gross profit – $1.13B $11.05B
Operating income – $742.14M -$1.24B
Net income $5.03B $683.27M $4.86B
Free cash flow -$26.00M $720.83M $2.65B
EPS (diluted) $217.11 $4.87 $9.62
Cash & equivalents – $448.45M $6.12B
Total debt – $745.23M $8.73B
Shares (diluted) 23.08M 140.32M 505.58M
Enterprise value $58.43B $4.50B $35.95B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFRFHFACTAFL
P/E 7.6x 9.9x 12.5x
P/FCF -2,066x 9.3x 22.9x
P/Operating cash flow -1,648x 9.3x 22.9x
P/S 0.4x 5.3x 3.4x
P/B 1.7x 1.2x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 1.2x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 5.9x – –
EV/EBIT 6.3x 9.3x -51.3x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 5.5x 3.5x
EV/FCF -2,066x 9.6x 23.9x
EV/Operating cash flow -1,648x 9.6x 23.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.66 1.91 1.93

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFRFHFACTAFL
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.0% 2.5% 10.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 75.1% 4.1% -1.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.2% 25.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 1.7% 2.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -3.8% 68.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -3.6% 28.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 0.7% 0.9% 99.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.7% 0.2% 0.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 5.4% 8.4% 112.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.3% 5.2% 6.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -100.9% 2.9% 2.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 73.3% 9.7% -8.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -100.8% 2.9% 2.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 75.1% 9.7% -8.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFRFHFACTAFL
Gross margin – 90.1% 61.1%
EBITDA margin 6.7% – –
Operating margin – 59.2% -6.8%
Pretax margin 4.7% 69.1% 32.0%
Net margin 3.7% 54.5% 26.9%
FCF margin 0.0% 57.5% 14.6%
Operating cash flow margin 0.0% 57.5% 14.6%
Return on equity 24.7% 12.7% 16.1%
Return on assets 7.0% 9.8% 4.2%
Return on invested capital – 9.6% -2.7%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.2x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 1.1x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFRFHFACTAFL
Debt / assets – 10.7% 7.5%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 1.0x 3.3x
Liabilities / assets 71.6% 22.4% 73.9%
Equity / assets 28.4% 77.6% 26.1%
Interest coverage 10.0x 14.8x -5.1x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFRFHFACTAFL
Dividend yield 0.8% 1.9% 2.0%
Net buyback yield 0.0% 6.3% 6.2%
Shareholder yield 0.8% 8.1% 8.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 10.7% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) -2,077% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -18.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFRFHFACTAFL
Forward P/E 9.7xFY2026 10.6xFY2026 16.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $182.80FY2026 $4.54FY2026 $7.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -14.5%FY2026 +0.4%FY2026 -2.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.4% +15.4% +8.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $33.74BFY2026 $1.31BFY2026 $17.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.3%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.8% -6.4% -0.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFRFHFACTAFL
Held by institutions 0.3% 21.4% 68.2%
Institutions holding 17 248 1,698
Change in shares held, QoQ -14.0% +8.9% +0.6%
Institutions buying 7 144 740
Institutions selling 1 72 580
Buyers to sellers 7.00 2.00 1.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FRFHFACTAFL
FRFHF 1.00 0.19 0.22
ACT 0.19 1.00 0.44
AFL 0.22 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FRFHF, ACT and AFL?

Aflac (AFL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) $53.71B, Enact Holdings (ACT) $6.67B, Aflac (AFL) $60.74B.

Which stock is cheaper, FRFHF, ACT and AFL?

Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 7.6x, Enact Holdings (ACT) 9.9x, Aflac (AFL) 12.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) is cheapest (Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 9.7x, Enact Holdings (ACT) 10.6x, Aflac (AFL) 16.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Aflac (AFL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) +10.0%, Enact Holdings (ACT) +2.5%, Aflac (AFL) +10.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Enact Holdings (ACT) has the highest net margin (Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 3.7%, Enact Holdings (ACT) 54.5%, Aflac (AFL) 26.9%). On return on invested capital, Enact Holdings (ACT) leads (Enact Holdings (ACT) 9.6%, Aflac (AFL) -2.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Enact Holdings (ACT) returned the most: Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) +7.0%, Enact Holdings (ACT) +31.7%, Aflac (AFL) +12.8%. Over five years, Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) compounded fastest (Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) +34.2%/yr, Enact Holdings (ACT) +16.0%/yr, Aflac (AFL) +16.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Aflac (AFL) has the highest dividend yield: Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 0.85%, Enact Holdings (ACT) 1.86%, Aflac (AFL) 1.99%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Aflac (AFL) has been the steadiest (Fairfax Financial Holdings (FRFHF) 22.6%, Enact Holdings (ACT) 23.1%, Aflac (AFL) 17.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FRFHF, ACT and AFL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Aflac (AFL) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.