FPH vs JOE vs TRC Stock Comparison

Five Point Holdings, St Joe and Tejon Ranch Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FOR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC
$4.22 -11.0% 1M -30.7% 1Y
Market cap
$316.18M
P/E
10.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$118.00M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
4 wins
JOE ST JOE Co
$67.62 +2.7% 1M +34.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.89B
P/E
31.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$547.84M
Div. yield
0.01%
Real Estate Development Real Estate
5 wins
TRC Tejon Ranch Co
$16.47 +1.1% 1M +2.2% 1Y
Market cap
$439.36M
P/E
72.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$56.84M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

St Joe leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (St Joe 5, Five Point Holdings 4, Tejon Ranch 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFPHJOETRCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $316.18M $3.89B $439.36M JOE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.8x 31.6x 72.8x FPH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 3.9x 87.8x 96.9x FPH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -39.1% +28.4% +25.4% JOE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 24.9% 22.5% 10.6% FPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.0% — 0.0% TRC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.7x — 12.9x FPH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.7% +34.5% +2.2% JOE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.9%/yr +7.7%/yr -2.3%/yr JOE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.3% 30.0% 21.3% TRC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 70/100 58/100 JOE

Percentile Scorecard

FPHJOETRC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFPHJOETRC
Valuation 63 #15 of 39 55 #18 of 39 34 #26 of 39
Growth 28 #24 of 33 88 #5 of 33 69 #11 of 33
Profitability 41 #18 of 30 93 #3 of 30 52 #15 of 30
Financial Health 76 #10 of 38 60 #16 of 38 78 #9 of 38
Shareholder Returns – 54 #7 of 14 –
Overall 52 70 58
  • FPH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • JOE ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • TRC ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFPHJOETRCSPY
1 month -11.0%+2.7%+1.1% -1.0%
3 months -19.5%+8.9%-6.6% +2.9%
6 months -17.4%-4.8%-16.5% +6.4%
Year to date -24.5%+13.9%+4.4% +11.4%
1 year -30.7%+34.5%+2.2% +13.1%
3 years +77.3%+36.6%+6.5% +79.4%
3 years, per year +21.1%+11.0%+2.1% +21.5%
5 years -46.9%+45.0%-11.1% +67.7%
5 years, per year -11.9%+7.7%-2.3% +10.9%
10 years —+271.5%-28.0% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+14.0%-3.2% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureFPHJOETRCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.3%30.0%21.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.4%26.5%20.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.530.480.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.051.150.10 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.8%-48.7%-32.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.0%-7.1%-19.6% -2.5%
52-week high $6.30$72.79$20.48 $779.14
52-week low $4.22$49.03$15.58 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFPHJOETRC
P/E now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 7.8x 31.4xmedian 7.8x 73.7xmedian 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 4.9x 7.0xmedian 4.9x 7.8xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -5.8xmedian 11.2x 17.6xmedian 11.2x 84.1xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 103.9xmedian 6.4x 20.2xmedian 6.4x -17.1xmedian 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.6x 5.0xmedian 0.6x 0.9xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.33median 0.33 2.31median 0.33 -2.94median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFPHJOETRC
Revenue $118.00M $547.84M $56.84M
Gross profit -$10.11M $241.34M –
Operating income -$131.54M $165.33M -$515.00K
Net income $79.23M $123.71M $6.04M
Free cash flow $6.01M $191.24M -$26.03M
EPS (diluted) $0.39 $2.15 $0.22
Cash & equivalents $358.72M $117.32M $3.87M
Total debt $1.78B – $377.27M
Shares (diluted) 76.10M 57.17M 27.07M
Enterprise value -$1.15B $3.38B $358.98M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFPHJOETRC
P/E 10.9x 31.4x 73.7x
P/FCF 103.9x 20.2x -17.1x
P/Operating cash flow 98.4x 17.8x 35.7x
P/S 5.3x 7.0x 7.8x
P/B 0.3x 5.0x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 5.0x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA -5.8x 17.6x 84.1x
EV/EBIT -5.4x 22.6x -1,021x
EV/Revenue 6.0x 6.8x 9.2x
EV/FCF 118.2x 19.5x -20.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 111.9x 17.2x 42.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.33 2.31 -2.94

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFPHJOETRC
Revenue growth (1Y) -39.1% 28.4% 25.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.4% 19.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 90.0% 38.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 53.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 51.4% 63.9% 94.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.7% 29.8% -27.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -67.8% 52.3% 1,237%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 14.2% -24.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -6.4% 51.0% 1,233%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.9% 13.6% -25.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -97.0% 84.3% -8.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -50.3% 44.3% 21.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -97.1% 134.2% 55.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -51.2% 47.3% -24.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFPHJOETRC
Gross margin -8.6% 44.1% –
EBITDA margin -103.9% 38.7% 11.0%
Operating margin -111.5% 30.2% -0.9%
Pretax margin 79.1% 30.3% 5.1%
Net margin 24.9% 22.5% 10.6%
FCF margin 5.1% 34.9% -45.8%
Operating cash flow margin 5.4% 39.6% 21.9%
Return on equity 3.4% 16.0% 1.2%
Return on assets 2.5% 8.2% 0.9%
Return on invested capital -4.0% – 0.0%
Return on capital employed – – -0.1%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.4x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 1.8x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 7.0% 0.2% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFPHJOETRC
Debt / assets 13.8% – 15.0%
Debt / equity 0.2x – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.7x – 12.9x
Debt / FCF 73.9x – -3.7x
Liabilities / assets 27.7% 48.8% 22.9%
Equity / assets 72.3% 51.2% 77.1%
Interest coverage – 5.7x –
Current ratio – – 2.9x
Quick ratio – – 1.6x
Cash ratio – – 1.4x
Altman Z-score – – 2.20

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFPHJOETRC
Dividend yield – 0.9% –
Net buyback yield – 1.6% –
Shareholder yield – 2.6% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 28.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 18.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 9.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 15.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFPHJOETRC
Forward P/E 3.9xFY2023 87.8xFY2026 96.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.09FY2023 $0.77FY2026 $0.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -42.1%FY2026 +1,600.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -37.6% – +147.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $559.28MFY2023 $273.72MFY2026 $57.93MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -29.7%FY2026 +16.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -42.5% – +23.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFPHJOETRC
Held by institutions 25.2% 87.6% 78.6%
Institutions holding 88 320 127
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% -0.2% +1.3%
Institutions buying 37 160 61
Institutions selling 28 97 30
Buyers to sellers 1.32 1.65 2.03

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FPHJOETRC
FPH 1.00 0.26 0.29
JOE 0.26 1.00 0.30
TRC 0.29 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FPH, JOE and TRC?

St Joe (JOE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Five Point Holdings (FPH) $316.18M, St Joe (JOE) $3.89B, Tejon Ranch (TRC) $439.36M.

Which stock is cheaper, FPH, JOE and TRC?

Five Point Holdings (FPH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 10.8x, St Joe (JOE) 31.6x, Tejon Ranch (TRC) 72.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Five Point Holdings (FPH) is cheapest (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 3.9x, St Joe (JOE) 87.8x, Tejon Ranch (TRC) 96.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

St Joe (JOE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Five Point Holdings (FPH) -39.1%, St Joe (JOE) +28.4%, Tejon Ranch (TRC) +25.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Five Point Holdings (FPH) has the highest net margin (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 24.9%, St Joe (JOE) 22.5%, Tejon Ranch (TRC) 10.6%). On return on invested capital, Tejon Ranch (TRC) leads (Five Point Holdings (FPH) -4.0%, Tejon Ranch (TRC) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year St Joe (JOE) returned the most: Five Point Holdings (FPH) -30.7%, St Joe (JOE) +34.5%, Tejon Ranch (TRC) +2.2%. Over five years, St Joe (JOE) compounded fastest (Five Point Holdings (FPH) -11.9%/yr, St Joe (JOE) +7.7%/yr, Tejon Ranch (TRC) -2.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Five Point Holdings (FPH) 0.00%, St Joe (JOE) 0.01%, Tejon Ranch (TRC) 0.00%. Five Point Holdings (FPH) and Tejon Ranch (TRC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tejon Ranch (TRC) has been the steadiest (Five Point Holdings (FPH) 29.3%, St Joe (JOE) 30.0%, Tejon Ranch (TRC) 21.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FPH, JOE and TRC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, St Joe (JOE) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.