FOXX vs FKWL vs GRMN Stock Comparison

Foxx Development Holdings, Franklin Wireless and Garmin Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (IRDM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FKWL Franklin Wireless Corp
$2.23 -2.6% 1M -55.9% 1Y
Market cap
$26.28M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$36.51M
Div. yield
1.79%
Networking Equipment Technology
2 wins
GRMN Garmin Ltd
$286.33 +2.5% 1M +39.3% 1Y
Market cap
$55.19B
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.89B
Div. yield
1.36%
Smartphones and Wearables Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Garmin leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Garmin 7, Franklin Wireless 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFOXXFKWLGRMNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.02M $26.28M $55.19B GRMN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.2x -5.5x 27.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 55.8x 27.6x GRMN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -20.2% -20.8% +13.6% GRMN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -100.2% -13.0% 25.6% GRMN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.79% 1.36% FKWL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -47.4% -55.9% +39.3% GRMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -15.7%/yr +15.0%/yr GRMN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 148.5% 32.7% 33.0% FKWL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 15/100 37/100 65/100 GRMN

Percentile Scorecard

FOXXFKWLGRMN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFOXXFKWLGRMN
Valuation 19 #91 of 112 29 #80 of 112 32 #76 of 112
Growth 10 #97 of 108 1 #107 of 108 67 #36 of 108
Profitability 19 #84 of 104 16 #88 of 104 89 #12 of 104
Financial Health 10 #105 of 116 64 #42 of 116 81 #23 of 116
Shareholder Returns – 73 #23 of 83 54 #39 of 83
Overall 15 37 65
  • FOXX ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FKWL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • GRMN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFOXXFKWLGRMNSPY
1 month -22.4%-2.6%+2.5% -5.9%
3 months -26.4%-1.8%-5.2% -4.6%
6 months -61.3%-35.5%+18.4% +0.2%
Year to date -60.3%-49.0%+41.2% +7.5%
1 year -47.4%-55.9%+39.3% +8.2%
3 years -83.2%-23.9%+146.2% +68.3%
3 years, per year -44.9%-8.7%+35.1% +19.0%
5 years —-57.3%+101.4% +56.5%
5 years, per year —-15.7%+15.0% +9.4%
10 years —-4.3%+509.1% +251.5%
10 years, per year —-0.4%+19.8% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureFOXXFKWLGRMNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 148.5%32.7%33.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 129.5%36.6%27.3% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.68-0.260.87 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.32-1.711.19 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.3%-69.5%-46.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -69.8%-56.9%-8.6% -5.9%
52-week high $6.09$5.18$313.16 $779.14
52-week low $1.71$2.12$187.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFOXXFKWLGRMN
P/E now vs peer median -0.2xmedian 25.2x -5.5xmedian 25.2x 27.4xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.4x 0.7xmedian 2.4x 7.0xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 16.2x —median 16.2x 21.4xmedian 16.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -32.5xmedian 23.4x -4.2xmedian 23.4x 37.6xmedian 23.4x
P/B now vs peer median -0.2xmedian 2.3x 0.9xmedian 2.3x 5.8xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.98 0.30median 0.98 1.13median 0.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFOXXFKWLGRMN
Revenue $52.58M $36.51M $7.89B
Gross profit $1.69M $6.26M $4.82B
Operating income -$43.90M -$2.68M $2.27B
Net income -$52.69M -$6.92M $2.02B
Free cash flow -$400.00K -$6.33M $1.47B
R&D $2.93M $3.23M $1.21B
EPS (diluted) $-7.61 $-0.40 $10.42
Cash & equivalents $1.47M – $2.04B
Total debt $77.85K – –
Shares (diluted) 6.92M 11.78M 193.62M
Enterprise value $5.10M -$96.38M $44.75B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFOXXFKWLGRMN
P/E -0.2x -5.5x 27.4x
P/FCF -32.5x -4.2x 37.6x
P/Operating cash flow -32.5x -4.2x 29.2x
P/S 0.2x 0.7x 7.0x
P/B -0.2x 0.9x 5.8x
P/Tangible book -0.2x 0.9x 5.9x
EV/EBITDA -0.3x – 21.4x
EV/EBIT -0.3x -2.9x 23.3x
EV/Revenue 0.2x 0.2x 6.7x
EV/FCF -29.1x -1.2x 36.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -29.1x -1.2x 28.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.30 1.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFOXXFKWLGRMN
Revenue growth (1Y) -20.2% -20.8% 13.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -7.4% 16.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -64.6% -21.0% 18.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -3.8% 18.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -352.6% 6.5% 27.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -4.5% 30.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -484.1% -4,827% 28.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -32.9% 24.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -418.9% -1,851% 28.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -18.2% 24.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 93.9% -441.4% 20.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -49.6% 13.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 94.0% -449.2% 10.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -48.6% 11.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFOXXFKWLGRMN
Gross margin 3.2% 17.1% 61.1%
EBITDA margin -83.4% – 31.3%
Operating margin -83.5% -7.3% 28.8%
Pretax margin -100.2% -19.3% 30.7%
Net margin -100.2% -13.0% 25.6%
FCF margin -0.8% -17.3% 18.6%
Operating cash flow margin -0.8% -17.2% 23.9%
Return on equity – -20.7% 21.7%
Return on assets -200.8% -14.3% 17.2%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -8.1% 23.7%
Asset turnover 2.0x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 0.9x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 2.4% – 2.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFOXXFKWLGRMN
Debt / assets 0.3% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x – –
Debt / FCF -0.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 333.4% 34.2% 20.4%
Equity / assets -233.4% 65.8% 79.6%
Interest coverage -5.0x – –
Current ratio 0.3x 2.7x 3.0x
Quick ratio 0.2x 1.4x 1.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 1.2x 1.1x
Altman Z-score -9.56 2.84 16.16

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFOXXFKWLGRMN
Dividend yield – 1.8% 1.4%
Net buyback yield – – -0.1%
Shareholder yield – 1.8% 1.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFOXXFKWLGRMN
Forward P/E – 55.8xFY2027 27.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.04FY2027 $10.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +21.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -50.0% +6.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $46.08MFY2027 $8.60BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +26.2%FY2027 +18.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +19.3% +2.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFOXXFKWLGRMN
Held by institutions 1.0% 13.1% 56.7%
Institutions holding 10 19 1,002
Change in shares held, QoQ +10.8% +38.6% +1.1%
Institutions buying 5 9 500
Institutions selling 2 3 348
Buyers to sellers 2.50 3.00 1.44

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FOXXFKWLGRMN
FOXX 1.00 0.02 0.04
FKWL 0.02 1.00 -0.05
GRMN 0.04 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FOXX, FKWL and GRMN?

Garmin (GRMN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) $13.02M, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) $26.28M, Garmin (GRMN) $55.19B.

Which company is growing faster?

Garmin (GRMN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) -20.2%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -20.8%, Garmin (GRMN) +13.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Garmin (GRMN) has the highest net margin (Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) -100.2%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -13.0%, Garmin (GRMN) 25.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Garmin (GRMN) returned the most: Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) -47.4%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -55.9%, Garmin (GRMN) +39.3%. Over five years, Garmin (GRMN) compounded fastest (Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -15.7%/yr, Garmin (GRMN) +15.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Franklin Wireless (FKWL) has the highest dividend yield: Franklin Wireless (FKWL) 1.79%, Garmin (GRMN) 1.36%. Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) has been the steadiest (Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) 148.5%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) 32.7%, Garmin (GRMN) 33.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FOXX, FKWL and GRMN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Garmin (GRMN) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.