FOXO vs NHC vs UHS Stock Comparison

Foxo Technologies, National Healthcare and Universal Health Services Prices as of Oct 30, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (THC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NHC National Healthcare Corp
$202.04 -11.3% 1M +69.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.34B
P/E
23.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.56B
Div. yield
0.01%
Home Health and Senior Care Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Universal Health Services leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Universal Health Services 5, National Healthcare 4, Foxo Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFOXONHCUHSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $262.16K $3.34B $11.22B UHS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 23.8x 7.4x UHS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 7.7x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +44.0% +6.9% +10.0% FOXO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -148.1% 9.0% 8.4% NHC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.0% 12.8% UHS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 16.6x — 1.7x UHS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.01% 0.00% NHC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +900.0% +69.2% -16.7% FOXO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +22.9%/yr +7.7%/yr NHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 447.9% 34.8% 33.2% UHS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 78/100 67/100 NHC

Percentile Scorecard

FOXONHCUHS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFOXONHCUHS
Valuation 33 #63 of 94 81 #19 of 94 97 #4 of 94
Growth 95 #5 of 87 79 #19 of 87 52 #42 of 87
Profitability 13 #75 of 86 78 #20 of 86 81 #17 of 86
Financial Health 4 #95 of 99 87 #14 of 99 41 #59 of 99
Shareholder Returns – 67 #19 of 56 66 #20 of 56
Overall 36 78 67
  • FOXO ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • NHC ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • UHS ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFOXONHCUHSSPY
1 month 0.0%-11.3%+2.8% -2.3%
3 months +100.0%-9.0%+6.9% -0.7%
6 months +900.0%+18.4%+8.8% +4.8%
Year to date +900.0%+47.4%-17.1% +10.3%
1 year +900.0%+69.2%-16.7% +10.3%
3 years -99.1%+184.9%+40.9% +73.0%
3 years, per year -79.5%+41.8%+12.1% +20.1%
5 years —+180.3%+44.8% +61.9%
5 years, per year —+22.9%+7.7% +10.1%
10 years —+214.4%+49.5% +258.6%
10 years, per year —+12.1%+4.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFOXONHCUHSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 447.9%34.8%33.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 567.5%32.4%35.2% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -2.960.180.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.011.98-0.50 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-34.4%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -71.4%-18.3%-26.0% -3.5%
52-week high $0.35$247.31$244.18 $779.14
52-week low $0.03$121.04$141.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFOXONHCUHS
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 25.3x 22.5xmedian 25.3x 7.1xmedian 25.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 1.5x 2.0xmedian 1.5x 0.5xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.7xmedian 14.6x 15.5xmedian 14.6x 5.2xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 21.6x 21.6xmedian 21.6x 11.0xmedian 21.6x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 3.1x 2.8xmedian 3.1x 1.2xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 0.83 0.36median 0.83 0.19median 0.83

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFOXONHCUHS
Revenue $17.86M $1.56B $18.11B
Operating income -$877.76K $144.68M $2.06B
Net income -$4.62M $142.84M $1.55B
Free cash flow -$493.07K $146.53M $845.40M
R&D $171.57K – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.27 $8.84 $25.47
Cash & equivalents $58.41K $39.21M $138.80M
Total debt $28.89M – $4.85B
Shares (diluted) 96.97M 15.86M 59.91M
Enterprise value -$773.24K $2.32B $10.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFOXONHCUHS
P/E 0.0x 22.5x 7.1x
P/FCF -0.3x 21.6x 11.0x
P/Operating cash flow -0.3x 16.8x 5.2x
P/S 0.0x 2.0x 0.5x
P/B 0.1x 2.8x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 0.0x 2.9x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 16.7x 15.5x 5.2x
EV/EBIT -33.0x 20.4x 6.8x
EV/Revenue 1.6x 1.9x 0.8x
EV/FCF -58.8x 20.2x 16.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -59.9x 15.6x 7.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 0.36 0.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFOXONHCUHS
Revenue growth (1Y) 44.0% 6.9% 10.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 239.4% 12.8% 9.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 85.3% 24.1% 13.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 73.0% 57.4% 23.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 53.3% 35.9% 20.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 61.1% 68.9% 31.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 88.8% 31.6% 31.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 92.2% 61.9% 37.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 90.3% 26.7% -5.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 68.1% 44.1% 15.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 90.1% 23.2% -6.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 67.9% 58.0% 18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFOXONHCUHS
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 9.7% 12.2% 14.9%
Operating margin -4.9% 9.3% 11.4%
Pretax margin -26.9% 11.9% 11.2%
Net margin -148.1% 9.0% 8.4%
FCF margin -2.8% 9.4% 4.7%
Operating cash flow margin -2.7% 12.1% 9.9%
Return on equity -86.9% 12.8% 20.5%
Return on assets -10.1% 9.3% 9.8%
Return on invested capital – 10.0% 12.8%
Return on capital employed -16.8% 11.2% 16.5%
Asset turnover 0.4x 1.0x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 1.3x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 50.6% 0.3% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFOXONHCUHS
Debt / assets 63.0% – 30.4%
Debt / equity 29.2x – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 16.6x – 1.7x
Debt / FCF -58.6x – 5.7x
Liabilities / assets 97.8% 26.6% 52.4%
Equity / assets 2.2% 73.4% 47.6%
Interest coverage -0.2x 56.6x 13.1x
Current ratio 0.1x 1.9x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.1x 1.5x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.9x 0.0x
Altman Z-score -7.26 6.94 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFOXONHCUHS
Dividend yield – 1.3% 0.4%
Net buyback yield – 0.1% 11.3%
Shareholder yield – 1.4% 11.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 27.8% 3.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 27.1% 5.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 5.6% -6.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 4.3% -4.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFOXONHCUHS
Forward P/E – – 7.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $23.16FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +6.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +8.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $18.14BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +4.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +10.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFOXONHCUHS
Held by institutions – 65.3% 87.6%
Institutions holding – 250 599
Change in shares held, QoQ – -0.6% +1.2%
Institutions buying – 136 289
Institutions selling – 72 236
Buyers to sellers – 1.89 1.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FOXONHCUHS
FOXO 1.00 -0.20 -0.10
NHC -0.20 1.00 0.35
UHS -0.10 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FOXO, NHC and UHS?

Universal Health Services (UHS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Foxo Technologies (FOXO) $262.16K, National Healthcare (NHC) $3.34B, Universal Health Services (UHS) $11.22B.

Which stock is cheaper, FOXO, NHC and UHS?

Universal Health Services (UHS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Foxo Technologies (FOXO) 0.0x, National Healthcare (NHC) 23.8x, Universal Health Services (UHS) 7.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Foxo Technologies (FOXO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Foxo Technologies (FOXO) +44.0%, National Healthcare (NHC) +6.9%, Universal Health Services (UHS) +10.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

National Healthcare (NHC) has the highest net margin (Foxo Technologies (FOXO) -148.1%, National Healthcare (NHC) 9.0%, Universal Health Services (UHS) 8.4%). On return on invested capital, Universal Health Services (UHS) leads (National Healthcare (NHC) 10.0%, Universal Health Services (UHS) 12.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Foxo Technologies (FOXO) returned the most: Foxo Technologies (FOXO) +900.0%, National Healthcare (NHC) +69.2%, Universal Health Services (UHS) -16.7%. Over five years, National Healthcare (NHC) compounded fastest (National Healthcare (NHC) +22.9%/yr, Universal Health Services (UHS) +7.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

National Healthcare (NHC) has the highest dividend yield: National Healthcare (NHC) 0.01%, Universal Health Services (UHS) 0.00%. Foxo Technologies (FOXO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Universal Health Services (UHS) has been the steadiest (Foxo Technologies (FOXO) 447.9%, National Healthcare (NHC) 34.8%, Universal Health Services (UHS) 33.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FOXO, NHC and UHS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Universal Health Services (UHS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.