FORM vs KLAC vs NPO Stock Comparison

Formfactor, Kla and Enpro Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ASML) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FORM Formfactor Inc
$97.46 -28.5% 1M +104.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.76B
P/E
38.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$980.10M
Div. yield
–
Test and Measurement Technology
4 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$167.43 -14.8% 1M +35.5% 1Y
Market cap
$205.56B
P/E
39.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.51B
Div. yield
0.01%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
6 wins
NPO Enpro Inc.
$284.50 -7.5% 1M +25.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.71B
P/E
129.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.22B
Div. yield
0.00%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kla leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Kla 6, Formfactor 4, Enpro 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFORMKLACNPOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.76B $205.56B $5.71B KLAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.9x 39.1x 129.5x FORM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.9x 29.5x 29.0x NPO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +29.1% +15.8% +13.3% FORM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 36.2% 3.6% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 43.4% 6.3% KLAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.6x 1.8x KLAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% KLAC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +104.2% +35.5% +25.2% FORM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +19.6%/yr +35.1%/yr +26.0%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 87.4% 61.7% 40.6% NPO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 59/100 43/100 FORM

Percentile Scorecard

FORMKLACNPO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFORMKLACNPO
Valuation 38 #70 of 112 39 #58 of 94 21 #160 of 203
Growth 97 #4 of 108 56 #41 of 92 48 #99 of 188
Profitability 73 #29 of 104 95 #5 of 88 55 #83 of 183
Financial Health 88 #15 of 116 20 #77 of 96 62 #82 of 216
Shareholder Returns – 83 #13 of 72 31 #106 of 152
Overall 74 59 43
  • FORM ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • NPO ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFORMKLACNPOSPY
1 month -28.5%-14.8%-7.5% +0.7%
3 months -7.5%-7.2%-9.1% +3.7%
6 months -28.3%-4.3%-2.4% +7.1%
Year to date +74.7%+37.8%+32.9% +12.8%
1 year +104.2%+35.5%+25.2% +11.9%
3 years +196.6%+264.3%+147.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +43.7%+53.9%+35.3% +22.8%
5 years +145.0%+349.2%+217.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +19.6%+35.1%+26.0% +10.9%
10 years +958.2%+2,142.6%+429.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +26.6%+36.5%+18.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFORMKLACNPOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 87.4%61.7%40.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.2%65.7%43.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.042.791.84 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.190.580.62 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.7%-51.7%-34.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.1%-44.5%-26.6% -1.2%
52-week high $159.93$301.71$387.65 $779.14
52-week low $47.72$109.71$202.55 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFORMKLACNPO
P/E now vs peer median 43.8xmedian 32.9x 41.6xmedian 46.4x 136.1xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 2.9x 15.0xmedian 7.8x 4.9xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 20.0x 33.8xmedian 27.5x 23.1xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 74.4xmedian 30.2x 54.0xmedian 40.1x 36.1xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 2.9x 33.4xmedian 4.7x 3.8xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.22median 1.08 1.98median 2.10 -3.67median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFORMKLACNPO
Revenue $980.10M $14.51B $1.22B
Gross profit $461.88M $8.92B $523.50M
Operating income $179.53M $6.19B $175.30M
Net income $173.63M $5.26B $44.10M
Free cash flow – $4.04B $167.00M
R&D $121.79M $1.57B –
EPS (diluted) $2.18 $4.01 $2.06
Cash & equivalents $138.18M $1.53B $77.00M
Total debt – $5.72B $575.50M
Shares (diluted) 79.61M 1.31B 21.40M
Enterprise value $6.76B $198.14B $5.31B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFORMKLACNPO
P/E 43.8x 41.6x 136.1x
P/FCF 74.4x 54.0x 36.1x
P/Operating cash flow 29.6x 48.3x 27.5x
P/S 7.8x 15.0x 4.9x
P/B 6.4x 33.4x 3.8x
P/Tangible book 6.5x 34.6x 7.5x
EV/EBITDA – 33.8x 23.1x
EV/EBIT – 35.9x 37.2x
EV/Revenue 7.8x 15.3x 5.3x
EV/FCF – 55.1x 39.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.6x 49.3x 29.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.22 1.98 -3.67

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFORMKLACNPO
Revenue growth (1Y) 29.1% 15.8% 13.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.0% 12.6% 3.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 58.4% 16.1% 13.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.1% 13.8% 5.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 333.3% 18.2% 14.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 143.4% 17.8% 78.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 325.1% 24.1% -47.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 196.9% 19.2% -36.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 315.1% 25.3% -48.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 195.5% 21.0% -37.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 144.0% 6.2% 17.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 50.0% 8.4% 21.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 4.1% 9.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 7.9% 24.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFORMKLACNPO
Gross margin – 61.5% 42.8%
EBITDA margin – 45.4% 23.1%
Operating margin – 42.6% 14.3%
Pretax margin – 42.2% 4.6%
Net margin – 36.2% 3.6%
FCF margin – 27.8% 13.6%
Operating cash flow margin 26.2% 31.1% 17.9%
Return on equity 14.8% 81.7% 2.8%
Return on assets 12.2% 28.9% 1.7%
Return on invested capital – 43.4% 6.3%
Return on capital employed – 45.4% 7.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.8x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 0.9x 5.0x
Stock comp / revenue 3.6% 2.2% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFORMKLACNPO
Debt / assets – 31.1% 21.6%
Debt / equity – 0.9x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.6x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – 1.4x 3.4x
Liabilities / assets 17.5% 64.6% 40.3%
Equity / assets 82.5% 35.4% 59.7%
Interest coverage – 22.0x 5.2x
Current ratio 3.7x 2.8x 2.3x
Quick ratio – 1.0x 1.2x
Cash ratio – 0.3x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 13.74 4.81

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFORMKLACNPO
Dividend yield – 0.3% 0.4%
Net buyback yield – 1.2% 0.2%
Shareholder yield – 1.5% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 21.1% 60.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 27.5% 16.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 15.7% 3.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 15.2% 3.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFORMKLACNPO
Forward P/E 30.9xFY2026 29.5xFY2027 29.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.15FY2026 $5.67FY2027 $9.81FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +142.3%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027 +24.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +31.4% +16.6% +17.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $982.39MFY2026 $19.18BFY2027 $1.40BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.1%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027 +23.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +21.5% +8.6% +8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFORMKLACNPO
Held by institutions 92.0% 91.0% 99.9%
Institutions holding 510 2,479 411
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.7% +4.2% +0.7%
Institutions buying 304 1,285 212
Institutions selling 169 983 136
Buyers to sellers 1.80 1.31 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FORMKLACNPO
FORM 1.00 0.72 0.65
KLAC 0.72 1.00 0.63
NPO 0.65 0.63 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FORM, KLAC and NPO?

Kla (KLAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Formfactor (FORM) $6.76B, Kla (KLAC) $205.56B, Enpro (NPO) $5.71B.

Which stock is cheaper, FORM, KLAC and NPO?

Formfactor (FORM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Formfactor (FORM) 38.9x, Kla (KLAC) 39.1x, Enpro (NPO) 129.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Enpro (NPO) is cheapest (Formfactor (FORM) 30.9x, Kla (KLAC) 29.5x, Enpro (NPO) 29.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Formfactor (FORM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Formfactor (FORM) +29.1%, Kla (KLAC) +15.8%, Enpro (NPO) +13.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Kla (KLAC) 36.2%, Enpro (NPO) 3.6%). On return on invested capital, Kla (KLAC) leads (Kla (KLAC) 43.4%, Enpro (NPO) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Formfactor (FORM) returned the most: Formfactor (FORM) +104.2%, Kla (KLAC) +35.5%, Enpro (NPO) +25.2%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Formfactor (FORM) +19.6%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +35.1%/yr, Enpro (NPO) +26.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest dividend yield: Formfactor (FORM) 0.00%, Kla (KLAC) 0.01%, Enpro (NPO) 0.00%. Formfactor (FORM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Enpro (NPO) has been the steadiest (Formfactor (FORM) 87.4%, Kla (KLAC) 61.7%, Enpro (NPO) 40.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FORM, KLAC and NPO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kla (KLAC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.