FORM vs KLAC vs EMR Stock Comparison

Formfactor, Kla and Emerson Electric Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RAL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FORM Formfactor Inc
$97.46 -28.5% 1M +104.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.60B
P/E
38.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$980.10M
Div. yield
–
Test and Measurement Technology
3 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$167.43 -14.8% 1M +35.5% 1Y
Market cap
$204.12B
P/E
38.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.51B
Div. yield
0.01%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
5 wins
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$170.76 +8.6% 1M +25.2% 1Y
Market cap
$91.36B
P/E
35.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kla leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kla 5, Emerson Electric 4, Formfactor 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFORMKLACEMRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.60B $204.12B $91.36B KLAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.0x 38.8x 35.4x EMR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.9x 29.5x 25.3x EMR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +29.1% +15.8% +4.8% FORM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 36.2% 13.8% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 43.4% 10.9% KLAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.6x 1.8x KLAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% EMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +104.2% +35.5% +25.2% FORM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +19.6%/yr +35.1%/yr +12.0%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 87.4% 61.7% 31.8% EMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 59/100 45/100 FORM

Percentile Scorecard

FORMKLACEMR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFORMKLACEMR
Valuation 38 #70 of 112 39 #58 of 94 33 #136 of 203
Growth 97 #4 of 108 56 #41 of 92 41 #112 of 188
Profitability 73 #29 of 104 95 #5 of 88 87 #24 of 183
Financial Health 88 #15 of 116 20 #77 of 96 30 #152 of 216
Shareholder Returns – 83 #13 of 72 35 #99 of 152
Overall 74 59 45
  • FORM ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFORMKLACEMRSPY
1 month -28.5%-14.8%+8.6% +0.7%
3 months -7.5%-7.2%+14.9% +3.7%
6 months -28.3%-4.3%+21.6% +7.1%
Year to date +74.7%+37.8%+28.7% +12.8%
1 year +104.2%+35.5%+25.2% +11.9%
3 years +196.6%+264.3%+93.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +43.7%+53.9%+24.5% +22.8%
5 years +145.0%+349.2%+76.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year +19.6%+35.1%+12.0% +10.9%
10 years +958.2%+2,142.6%+240.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year +26.6%+36.5%+13.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFORMKLACEMRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 87.4%61.7%31.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.2%65.7%33.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.042.791.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.190.580.79 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.7%-51.7%-29.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.1%-44.5%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $159.93$301.71$170.76 $779.14
52-week low $47.72$109.71$123.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFORMKLACEMR
P/E now vs peer median 43.8xmedian 32.9x 41.6xmedian 46.4x 37.0xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 2.9x 15.0xmedian 7.8x 5.1xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 20.0x 33.8xmedian 27.5x 17.2xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 74.4xmedian 30.2x 54.0xmedian 40.1x 27.5xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 2.9x 33.4xmedian 4.7x 4.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.22median 1.08 1.98median 2.10 -0.89median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFORMKLACEMR
Revenue $980.10M $14.51B $18.64B
Gross profit $461.88M $8.92B $9.91B
Operating income $179.53M $6.19B $4.68B
Net income $173.63M $5.26B $2.58B
Free cash flow – $4.04B $3.46B
R&D $121.79M $1.57B –
EPS (diluted) $2.18 $4.01 $4.59
Cash & equivalents $138.18M $1.53B $2.18B
Total debt – $5.72B $13.11B
Shares (diluted) 79.61M 1.31B 561.10M
Enterprise value $6.60B $196.70B $84.09B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFORMKLACEMR
P/E 43.8x 41.6x 37.0x
P/FCF 74.4x 54.0x 27.5x
P/Operating cash flow 29.6x 48.3x 24.3x
P/S 7.8x 15.0x 5.1x
P/B 6.4x 33.4x 4.7x
P/Tangible book 6.5x 34.6x 8.1x
EV/EBITDA – 33.8x 17.2x
EV/EBIT – 35.9x 22.7x
EV/Revenue 7.8x 15.3x 5.7x
EV/FCF – 55.1x 30.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.6x 49.3x 27.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.22 1.98 -0.89

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFORMKLACEMR
Revenue growth (1Y) 29.1% 15.8% 4.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.0% 12.6% 7.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 58.4% 16.1% 5.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 25.1% 13.8% 11.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 333.3% 18.2% 9.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 143.4% 17.8% 13.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 325.1% 24.1% -3.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 196.9% 19.2% -42.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 315.1% 25.3% -2.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 195.5% 21.0% -41.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 144.0% 6.2% 4.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 50.0% 8.4% 10.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 4.1% 4.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 7.9% 9.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFORMKLACEMR
Gross margin – 61.5% 53.2%
EBITDA margin – 45.4% 33.1%
Operating margin – 42.6% 25.1%
Pretax margin – 42.2% 17.6%
Net margin – 36.2% 13.8%
FCF margin – 27.8% 18.6%
Operating cash flow margin 26.2% 31.1% 21.0%
Return on equity 14.8% 81.7% 12.7%
Return on assets 12.2% 28.9% 6.1%
Return on invested capital – 43.4% 10.9%
Return on capital employed – 45.4% 14.9%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.8x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 0.9x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 3.6% 2.2% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFORMKLACEMR
Debt / assets – 31.1% 31.1%
Debt / equity – 0.9x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.6x 1.8x
Debt / FCF – 1.4x 3.8x
Liabilities / assets 17.5% 64.6% 51.7%
Equity / assets 82.5% 35.4% 48.3%
Interest coverage – 22.0x –
Current ratio 3.7x 2.8x 0.9x
Quick ratio – 1.0x 0.5x
Cash ratio – 0.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 13.74 4.77

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFORMKLACEMR
Dividend yield – 0.3% 1.3%
Net buyback yield – 1.2% 1.0%
Shareholder yield – 1.5% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 21.1% 47.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 27.5% 35.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 15.7% 3.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 15.2% 0.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFORMKLACEMR
Forward P/E 30.9xFY2026 29.5xFY2027 25.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.15FY2026 $5.67FY2027 $6.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +142.3%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027 +12.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +31.4% +16.6% +15.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $982.39MFY2026 $19.18BFY2027 $18.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.1%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027 +0.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +21.5% +8.6% +15.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFORMKLACEMR
Held by institutions 92.0% 91.0% 82.1%
Institutions holding 510 2,479 2,292
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.7% +4.2% +0.9%
Institutions buying 304 1,285 1,081
Institutions selling 169 983 799
Buyers to sellers 1.80 1.31 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FORMKLACEMR
FORM 1.00 0.72 0.36
KLAC 0.72 1.00 0.49
EMR 0.36 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FORM, KLAC and EMR?

Kla (KLAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Formfactor (FORM) $6.60B, Kla (KLAC) $204.12B, Emerson Electric (EMR) $91.36B.

Which stock is cheaper, FORM, KLAC and EMR?

Emerson Electric (EMR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Formfactor (FORM) 38.0x, Kla (KLAC) 38.8x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 35.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Emerson Electric (EMR) is cheapest (Formfactor (FORM) 30.9x, Kla (KLAC) 29.5x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 25.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Formfactor (FORM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Formfactor (FORM) +29.1%, Kla (KLAC) +15.8%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Kla (KLAC) 36.2%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%). On return on invested capital, Kla (KLAC) leads (Kla (KLAC) 43.4%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Formfactor (FORM) returned the most: Formfactor (FORM) +104.2%, Kla (KLAC) +35.5%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +25.2%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Formfactor (FORM) +19.6%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +35.1%/yr, Emerson Electric (EMR) +12.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest dividend yield: Formfactor (FORM) 0.00%, Kla (KLAC) 0.01%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 0.01%. Formfactor (FORM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Electric (EMR) has been the steadiest (Formfactor (FORM) 87.4%, Kla (KLAC) 61.7%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FORM, KLAC and EMR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kla (KLAC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.