FORM vs EMR vs KLAC Stock Comparison

Formfactor, Emerson Electric and Kla Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ASML) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FORM Formfactor Inc
$98.51 -25.0% 1M +129.9% 1Y
Market cap
$7.89B
P/E
68.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$902.23M
Div. yield
–
Test and Measurement Technology
4 wins
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$161.60 +4.6% 1M +21.3% 1Y
Market cap
$90.47B
P/E
35.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
4 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$145.61 -22.5% 1M +25.6% 1Y
Market cap
$195.64B
P/E
40.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.58B
Div. yield
0.01%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kla leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Kla 4, Emerson Electric 4, Formfactor 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFORMEMRKLACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.89B $90.47B $195.64B KLAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 68.4x 35.1x 40.5x EMR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.3x 24.0x 25.7x EMR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.0% +4.8% +11.7% FORM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.8% 13.8% 35.6% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.2% 10.9% 40.7% KLAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.2x 1.8x 0.7x FORM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% EMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +129.9% +21.3% +25.6% FORM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +21.6%/yr +10.8%/yr +33.6%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 87.1% 31.7% 61.4% EMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 45/100 59/100 FORM

Percentile Scorecard

FORMEMRKLAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFORMEMRKLAC
Valuation 29 #80 of 112 35 #133 of 203 38 #59 of 95
Growth 96 #5 of 109 40 #113 of 188 54 #43 of 93
Profitability 76 #26 of 105 85 #29 of 187 97 #4 of 91
Financial Health 91 #11 of 117 29 #158 of 222 21 #81 of 102
Shareholder Returns 40 #50 of 82 36 #99 of 153 84 #13 of 76
Overall 66 45 59
  • FORM ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • KLAC ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFORMEMRKLACSPY
1 month -25.0%+4.6%-22.5% -1.0%
3 months -5.3%+9.2%-30.8% +2.9%
6 months -36.5%+14.3%-24.7% +6.4%
Year to date +76.6%+21.8%+19.8% +11.4%
1 year +129.9%+21.3%+25.6% +13.1%
3 years +198.6%+78.1%+209.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +44.0%+21.2%+45.8% +21.5%
5 years +165.2%+67.2%+324.5% +67.7%
5 years, per year +21.6%+10.8%+33.6% +10.9%
10 years +870.5%+222.5%+1,877.3% +255.2%
10 years, per year +25.5%+12.4%+34.8% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureFORMEMRKLACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 87.1%31.7%61.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 87.4%33.3%65.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.961.522.79 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.490.670.42 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.7%-29.9%-51.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.4%-1.7%-51.7% -2.5%
52-week high $159.93$164.37$301.71 $779.14
52-week low $42.42$123.30$109.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFORMEMRKLAC
P/E now vs peer median 66.6xmedian 31.3x 35.0xmedian 25.9x 39.5xmedian 41.5x
P/S now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 2.6x 4.8xmedian 1.9x 14.0xmedian 6.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 48.0xmedian 19.6x 16.4xmedian 13.7x 32.1xmedian 27.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 56.5xmedian 28.3x 26.0xmedian 21.1x 50.5xmedian 35.6x
P/B now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 2.9x 4.4xmedian 2.3x 30.0xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.42median 1.15 -0.84median 1.19 2.66median 2.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFORMEMRKLAC
Revenue $902.23M $18.64B $13.58B
Gross profit $389.11M $9.91B $8.32B
Operating income $115.94M $4.68B $5.66B
Net income $115.47M $2.58B $4.83B
Free cash flow $136.12M $3.46B $3.77B
R&D $120.97M – $1.53B
EPS (diluted) $1.45 $4.59 $3.66
Cash & equivalents $109.76M $2.18B $1.65B
Total debt $48.82M $54.11B $5.89B
Shares (diluted) 79.61M 561.10M 1.32B
Enterprise value $6.70B $83.21B $187.80B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFORMEMRKLAC
P/E 66.6x 35.0x 39.5x
P/FCF 56.5x 26.0x 50.5x
P/Operating cash flow 42.8x 23.0x 45.9x
P/S 8.5x 4.8x 14.0x
P/B 6.9x 4.4x 30.0x
P/Tangible book 7.0x 7.7x 31.2x
EV/EBITDA 48.0x 16.4x 32.1x
EV/EBIT 63.5x 21.6x 34.4x
EV/Revenue 8.2x 5.4x 14.3x
EV/FCF 54.1x 29.2x 51.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 41.0x 25.8x 47.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.42 -0.84 2.66

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFORMEMRKLAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.0% 4.8% 11.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.4% 7.6% 9.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 31.6% 5.7% 12.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.4% 11.0% 9.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 180.9% 9.2% 12.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 121.2% 13.6% 12.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 162.9% -3.0% 18.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 162.2% -42.0% 12.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 156.0% -2.2% 20.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 160.2% -41.6% 14.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 71.0% 4.4% 1.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.1% 10.1% 4.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 3,646% 4.4% 0.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 212.7% 9.4% 4.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFORMEMRKLAC
Gross margin 43.1% 53.2% 61.3%
EBITDA margin 17.0% 33.1% 44.6%
Operating margin 12.9% 25.1% 41.7%
Pretax margin 14.1% 17.6% 41.3%
Net margin 12.8% 13.8% 35.6%
FCF margin 15.1% 18.6% 27.7%
Operating cash flow margin 19.9% 21.0% 30.5%
Return on equity 10.2% 12.7% 79.3%
Return on assets 8.5% 6.1% 27.7%
Return on invested capital 9.2% 10.9% 40.7%
Return on capital employed 10.2% 14.9% 43.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.5x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 4.0% 1.3% 2.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFORMEMRKLAC
Debt / assets 0.9% 31.1% 32.8%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.6x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.2x 1.8x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 0.1x 3.8x 1.6x
Liabilities / assets 17.2% 51.7% 64.6%
Equity / assets 82.8% 48.3% 35.4%
Interest coverage – – 19.9x
Current ratio 4.1x 0.9x 2.9x
Quick ratio 3.1x 0.5x 1.1x
Cash ratio 2.1x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 21.65 4.63 12.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFORMEMRKLAC
Dividend yield – 1.4% 0.6%
Net buyback yield -0.1% 1.0% 1.1%
Shareholder yield -0.1% 2.4% 1.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 47.8% 21.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.6% 28.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.1% 17.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.7% 13.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFORMEMRKLAC
Forward P/E 31.3xFY2026 24.0xFY2026 25.7xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $3.15FY2026 $6.74FY2026 $5.67FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +142.3%FY2026 +12.3%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +31.4% +15.4% +16.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $982.39MFY2026 $18.13BFY2026 $19.18BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +25.1%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +21.5% +15.3% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFORMEMRKLAC
Held by institutions 92.0% 82.1% 91.0%
Institutions holding 509 2,290 2,478
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.7% +0.9% +4.2%
Institutions buying 304 1,080 1,285
Institutions selling 168 798 982
Buyers to sellers 1.81 1.35 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FORMEMRKLAC
FORM 1.00 0.36 0.71
EMR 0.36 1.00 0.49
KLAC 0.71 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FORM, EMR and KLAC?

Kla (KLAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Formfactor (FORM) $7.89B, Emerson Electric (EMR) $90.47B, Kla (KLAC) $195.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, FORM, EMR and KLAC?

Emerson Electric (EMR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Formfactor (FORM) 68.4x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 35.1x, Kla (KLAC) 40.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Emerson Electric (EMR) is cheapest (Formfactor (FORM) 31.3x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.0x, Kla (KLAC) 25.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Formfactor (FORM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Formfactor (FORM) +18.0%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Kla (KLAC) +11.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Formfactor (FORM) 12.8%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Kla (KLAC) 35.6%). On return on invested capital, Kla (KLAC) leads (Formfactor (FORM) 9.2%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, Kla (KLAC) 40.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Formfactor (FORM) returned the most: Formfactor (FORM) +129.9%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +21.3%, Kla (KLAC) +25.6%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Formfactor (FORM) +21.6%/yr, Emerson Electric (EMR) +10.8%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +33.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest dividend yield: Formfactor (FORM) 0.00%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 0.01%, Kla (KLAC) 0.01%. Formfactor (FORM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Electric (EMR) has been the steadiest (Formfactor (FORM) 87.1%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.7%, Kla (KLAC) 61.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FORM, EMR and KLAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kla (KLAC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.