FNV vs KKR vs BAM Stock Comparison

Franco Nevada, Kkr and Brookfield Asset Management Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FNV FRANCO NEVADA Corp
$250.72 +2.8% 1M +33.6% 1Y
Market cap
$48.67B
P/E
33.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.32B
Div. yield
0.01%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
5 wins
KKR KKR & Co. Inc.
$98.34 +8.4% 1M -17.3% 1Y
Market cap
$86.37B
P/E
28.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.31B
Div. yield
0.01%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Franco Nevada leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Franco Nevada 5, Kkr 4, Brookfield Asset Management 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFNVKKRBAMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $48.67B $86.37B $83.63B KKR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.4x 28.9x 29.8x KKR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 32.0x 11.5x 30.2x KKR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +73.6% +31.1% +31.9% FNV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 62.8% 14.0% 48.9% FNV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.0% 26.8% BAM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.5x 0.5x BAM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% KKR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +33.6% -17.3% -2.7% FNV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.9%/yr +4.1%/yr — FNV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.9% 39.0% 31.7% BAM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 81/100 58/100 73/100 FNV

Percentile Scorecard

FNVKKRBAM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFNVKKRBAM
Valuation 56 #89 of 200 78 #44 of 200 57 #86 of 200
Growth 91 #12 of 117 79 #25 of 117 87 #16 of 117
Profitability 99 #3 of 144 54 #67 of 144 95 #8 of 144
Financial Health 99 #3 of 166 32 #113 of 166 66 #57 of 166
Shareholder Returns 64 #30 of 81 46 #44 of 81 60 #33 of 81
Overall 81 58 73
  • FNV ranked among 210 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • KKR ranked among 210 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • BAM ranked among 210 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFNVKKRBAMSPY
1 month +2.8%+8.4%+16.1% -5.9%
3 months +8.5%-4.9%-1.3% -4.6%
6 months +9.9%-2.0%+7.6% +0.2%
Year to date +21.0%-22.9%+0.2% +7.5%
1 year +33.6%-17.3%-2.7% +8.2%
3 years +101.5%+65.6%+68.4% +68.3%
3 years, per year +26.3%+18.3%+19.0% +19.0%
5 years +75.3%+22.5%— +56.5%
5 years, per year +11.9%+4.1%— +9.4%
10 years +272.0%+621.0%— +251.5%
10 years, per year +14.0%+21.8%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureFNVKKRBAMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.9%39.0%31.7% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.6%41.0%31.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.101.381.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.84-0.44-0.09 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.2%-49.8%-32.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.7%-31.1%-6.0% -5.9%
52-week high $280.82$142.77$55.85 $779.14
52-week low $187.72$83.88$42.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFNVKKRBAM
P/E now vs peer median 33.2xmedian 33.2x 29.5xmedian 33.2x 29.9xmedian 33.2x
P/S now vs peer median 20.9xmedian 4.4x 4.1xmedian 4.4x 14.6xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.0xmedian 13.0x 13.1xmedian 13.0x 22.0xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.3xmedian 14.5x 37.7xmedian 14.5x 36.3xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 1.8x 1.1xmedian 1.8x 9.1xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 1.11median 0.77 0.99median 0.77 —median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFNVKKRBAM
Revenue $2.32B $21.31B $5.74B
Gross profit $1.79B – –
Operating income $1.82B – –
Net income $1.48B $5.64B $3.07B
Free cash flow $1.77B $2.34B $2.31B
EPS (diluted) $7.54 $3.16 $1.74
Cash & equivalents $1.01B $21.08B $1.50B
Total debt – $53.48B $3.47B
Shares (diluted) 193.00M 945.58M 1.61B
Enterprise value $46.03B $6.51B $78.44B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFNVKKRBAM
P/E 33.2x 29.5x 29.9x
P/FCF 27.3x 37.7x 36.3x
P/Operating cash flow 27.2x 35.5x 35.9x
P/S 20.9x 4.1x 14.6x
P/B 5.9x 1.1x 9.1x
P/Tangible book 5.9x 1.2x 9.4x
EV/EBITDA 22.0x 13.1x 22.0x
EV/EBIT 26.0x 12.8x 22.3x
EV/Revenue 20.4x 5.7x 15.0x
EV/FCF 26.7x 51.6x 37.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.6x 48.5x 36.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.11 0.99 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFNVKKRBAM
Revenue growth (1Y) 73.6% 31.1% 31.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.5% 24.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 88.6% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 32.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 89.7% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 34.4% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 88.3% 16.1% 32.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 30.6% 48.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 87.7% 50.9% 16.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 29.9% 29.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 53.7% -47.6% 73.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.0% 33.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 83.9% -48.8% 72.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.8% 32.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFNVKKRBAM
Gross margin 77.3% – –
EBITDA margin 93.0% 43.3% 68.1%
Operating margin 78.5% – –
Pretax margin 85.0% 31.1% 64.7%
Net margin 62.8% 14.0% 48.9%
FCF margin 76.4% 11.0% 40.3%
Operating cash flow margin 76.7% 11.7% 40.7%
Return on equity 18.1% 7.1% 34.5%
Return on assets 16.7% 1.3% 16.1%
Return on invested capital – 6.0% 26.8%
Return on capital employed 20.9% – –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.1x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.4x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 3.6% 2.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFNVKKRBAM
Debt / assets – 12.9% 17.3%
Debt / equity – 0.7x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.5x 0.5x
Debt / FCF – 22.9x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 7.6% 81.3% 54.2%
Equity / assets 92.4% 18.7% 45.8%
Interest coverage 1,070x 3.4x 27.0x
Current ratio 9.4x – –
Quick ratio 8.5x – –
Cash ratio 6.9x – –
Altman Z-score 43.98 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFNVKKRBAM
Dividend yield 0.7% 0.8% 3.7%
Net buyback yield 0.0% 0.3% 1.0%
Shareholder yield 0.7% 1.0% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 18.0% 11.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 15.1% 28.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 12.4% 6.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 7.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFNVKKRBAM
Forward P/E 32.0xFY2026 11.5xFY2026 30.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.83FY2026 $8.52FY2026 $1.74FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +40.3%FY2026 +74.9%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.8% -19.0% +30.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.66BFY2026 $11.55BFY2026 $6.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +46.4%FY2026 +50.8%FY2026 +20.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.3% +1.9% +5.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFNVKKRBAM
Held by institutions 71.6% 60.4% 93.3%
Institutions holding 663 1,269 621
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.4% +3.8% +0.6%
Institutions buying 336 634 293
Institutions selling 207 459 205
Buyers to sellers 1.62 1.38 1.43

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FNVKKRBAM
FNV 1.00 0.15 0.26
KKR 0.15 1.00 0.78
BAM 0.26 0.78 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FNV, KKR and BAM?

Kkr (KKR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Franco Nevada (FNV) $48.67B, Kkr (KKR) $86.37B, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) $83.63B.

Which stock is cheaper, FNV, KKR and BAM?

Kkr (KKR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Franco Nevada (FNV) 33.4x, Kkr (KKR) 28.9x, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 29.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kkr (KKR) is cheapest (Franco Nevada (FNV) 32.0x, Kkr (KKR) 11.5x, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 30.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Franco Nevada (FNV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Franco Nevada (FNV) +73.6%, Kkr (KKR) +31.1%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) +31.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Franco Nevada (FNV) has the highest net margin (Franco Nevada (FNV) 62.8%, Kkr (KKR) 14.0%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 48.9%). On return on invested capital, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) leads (Kkr (KKR) 6.0%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 26.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Franco Nevada (FNV) returned the most: Franco Nevada (FNV) +33.6%, Kkr (KKR) -17.3%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) -2.7%. Over five years, Franco Nevada (FNV) compounded fastest (Franco Nevada (FNV) +11.9%/yr, Kkr (KKR) +4.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kkr (KKR) has the highest dividend yield: Franco Nevada (FNV) 0.01%, Kkr (KKR) 0.01%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 0.00%. Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) has been the steadiest (Franco Nevada (FNV) 39.9%, Kkr (KKR) 39.0%, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) 31.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FNV, KKR and BAM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Franco Nevada (FNV) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.