FNKO vs KRFG vs TBCH Stock Comparison

Funko, King Resources and Turtle Beach Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (JAKK) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FNKO Funko, Inc.
$6.13 +0.3% 1M +92.8% 1Y
Market cap
$368.53M
P/E
80.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$940.08M
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
KRFG King Resources, Inc.
$0.23 0.0% 1M +109.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.50M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
1 win
TBCH Turtle Beach Corp
$16.65 +23.2% 1M +4.9% 1Y
Market cap
$276.24M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$302.02M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Electronics Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Funko leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Funko 6, Turtle Beach 3, King Resources 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFNKOKRFGTBCHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $368.53M $2.50M $276.24M FNKO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 80.5x — -529.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.9x — 29.2x FNKO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.2% — -13.0% FNKO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.5% — -0.2% FNKO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.4% — 5.9% TBCH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x — 3.1x FNKO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +92.8% +109.1% +4.9% KRFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.2%/yr -70.1%/yr -10.4%/yr TBCH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 66.7% 166.3% 51.7% TBCH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 — 60/100 FNKO

Percentile Scorecard

FNKOKRFGTBCH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFNKOKRFGTBCH
Valuation 82 #7 of 34 3 #33 of 34 49 #22 of 42
Growth 94 #3 of 32 13 #28 of 32 53 #20 of 41
Profitability 61 #13 of 32 – 61 #16 of 39
Financial Health 28 #24 of 33 – 40 #27 of 44
Shareholder Returns – – 96 #2 of 27
Overall 66 – 60
  • FNKO ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • KRFG ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products
  • TBCH ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFNKOKRFGTBCHSPY
1 month +0.3%0.0%+23.2% -5.9%
3 months +16.1%0.0%+32.7% -4.6%
6 months +37.4%-65.2%+34.3% +0.2%
Year to date +80.3%-70.9%+18.7% +7.5%
1 year +92.8%+109.1%+4.9% +8.2%
3 years -21.9%-92.3%+88.0% +68.3%
3 years, per year -7.9%-57.5%+23.4% +19.0%
5 years -67.7%-99.8%-42.1% +56.5%
5 years, per year -20.2%-70.1%-10.4% +9.4%
10 years —-77.0%+222.7% +251.5%
10 years, per year —-13.7%+12.4% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureFNKOKRFGTBCHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 66.7%166.3%51.7% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.1%225.1%48.6% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.94-0.541.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.390.660.10 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.9%-99.9%-78.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.7%-76.0%-1.8% -5.9%
52-week high $7.10$0.96$16.96 $779.14
52-week low $2.81$0.08$10.14 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFNKOKRFGTBCH
P/E now vs peer median 75.1xmedian 18.6x —median 18.6x -571.8xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.0x —median 1.0x 1.0xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 9.9x —median 9.9x 16.6xmedian 10.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 10.6x -15.9xmedian 10.6x 7.3xmedian 12.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.5x —median 1.5x 3.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.84median 0.94 —median 0.94 -7.29median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFNKOKRFGTBCH
Revenue $940.08M – $302.02M
Gross profit $434.92M – $110.35M
Operating income $33.43M – $9.72M
Net income $5.55M -$2.84M -$522.00K
Free cash flow $48.62M -$157.31K $40.78M
R&D – – $18.20M
EPS (diluted) $0.08 – $-0.03
Cash & equivalents $41.61M – $11.19M
Total debt $195.86M – $79.91M
Shares (diluted) 58.11M 10.88M 18.20M
Enterprise value $209.77M $2.50M $216.20M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFNKOKRFGTBCH
P/E 75.1x – -571.8x
P/FCF 7.1x -15.9x 7.3x
P/Operating cash flow 4.2x -15.9x 7.0x
P/S 0.4x – 1.0x
P/B 1.7x – 3.5x
P/Tangible book 4.7x – 5.2x
EV/EBITDA 5.3x – 16.6x
EV/EBIT 14.9x – 37.8x
EV/Revenue 0.5x – 1.2x
EV/FCF 10.3x -15.9x 9.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 6.1x -15.9x 8.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.84 – -7.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFNKOKRFGTBCH
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.2% – -13.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.2% – 5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.5% – -12.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% – 20.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 172.5% – -67.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 30.3% – 31.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 108.0% -257.5% -102.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.6% -30.6% 78.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 106.3% – -103.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.4% – 78.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 209.6% -72.4% 17.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 56.0% 30.2% 6.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 612.7% -72.4% 20.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 62.2% 30.2% 8.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFNKOKRFGTBCH
Gross margin 46.3% – 36.5%
EBITDA margin 10.0% – 7.3%
Operating margin 3.6% – 3.2%
Pretax margin 1.2% – -0.1%
Net margin 0.5% – -0.2%
FCF margin 5.2% – 13.5%
Operating cash flow margin 8.8% – 14.2%
Return on equity 2.4% – -0.6%
Return on assets 0.7% – -0.2%
Return on invested capital 3.4% – 5.9%
Return on capital employed 8.1% – 6.5%
Asset turnover 1.4x – 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 14.8x 0.1x -82.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFNKOKRFGTBCH
Debt / assets 29.3% – 31.7%
Debt / equity 1.0x – 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x – 3.1x
Debt / FCF 4.0x – 2.0x
Liabilities / assets 70.4% – 65.7%
Equity / assets 29.6% – 34.3%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.2x – 1.9x
Quick ratio 0.7x – 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x – 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.74 – 2.12

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFNKOKRFGTBCH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – 9.8%
Shareholder yield – – 9.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFNKOKRFGTBCH
Forward P/E 13.9xFY2026 – 29.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.44FY2026 – $0.57FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -26.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -27.3% – +78.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $905.55MFY2026 – $361.27MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.3%FY2026 – +12.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.4% – +10.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFNKOKRFGTBCH
Held by institutions 83.8% – 68.8%
Institutions holding 125 – 112
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.1% – +3.8%
Institutions buying 67 – 58
Institutions selling 40 – 37
Buyers to sellers 1.68 – 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FNKOKRFGTBCH
FNKO 1.00 -0.06 0.34
KRFG -0.06 1.00 0.01
TBCH 0.34 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FNKO, KRFG and TBCH?

Funko (FNKO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Funko (FNKO) $368.53M, King Resources (KRFG) $2.50M, Turtle Beach (TBCH) $276.24M.

Which company is growing faster?

Funko (FNKO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Funko (FNKO) +1.2%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -13.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Funko (FNKO) has the highest net margin (Funko (FNKO) 0.5%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -0.2%). On return on invested capital, Turtle Beach (TBCH) leads (Funko (FNKO) 3.4%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) 5.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year King Resources (KRFG) returned the most: Funko (FNKO) +92.8%, King Resources (KRFG) +109.1%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) +4.9%. Over five years, Turtle Beach (TBCH) compounded fastest (Funko (FNKO) -20.2%/yr, King Resources (KRFG) -70.1%/yr, Turtle Beach (TBCH) -10.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Turtle Beach (TBCH) has been the steadiest (Funko (FNKO) 66.7%, King Resources (KRFG) 166.3%, Turtle Beach (TBCH) 51.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FNKO, KRFG and TBCH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Funko (FNKO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.