FN vs TTMI vs BHE Stock Comparison

Fabrinet, Ttm Technologies and Benchmark Electronics Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FN Fabrinet
$367.36 -10.4% 1M -16.0% 1Y
Market cap
$13.16B
P/E
27.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.64B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$90.79 -26.9% 1M +53.3% 1Y
Market cap
$9.57B
P/E
35.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.83B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
4 wins
BHE Benchmark Electronics Inc
$73.44 -11.2% 1M +71.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.63B
P/E
47.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.95B
Div. yield
0.93%
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ttm Technologies leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ttm Technologies 4, Benchmark Electronics 4, Fabrinet 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFNTTMIBHELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.16B $9.57B $2.63B FN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.8x 35.7x 47.0x FN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.6x 17.2x 25.5x TTMI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +35.7% +37.6% +12.9% TTMI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.2% 7.0% 1.9% FN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.1% 5.0% TTMI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.3x -0.8x BHE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.93% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.0% +53.3% +71.9% BHE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +30.8%/yr +47.0%/yr +25.8%/yr TTMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 77.8% 90.5% 45.8% BHE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 60/100 61/100 BHE

Percentile Scorecard

FNTTMIBHE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFNTTMIBHE
Valuation 42 #65 of 111 62 #43 of 111 82 #21 of 111
Growth 61 #43 of 108 91 #11 of 108 67 #36 of 108
Profitability 69 #33 of 104 61 #41 of 104 50 #53 of 104
Financial Health 58 #49 of 115 27 #84 of 115 47 #62 of 115
Shareholder Returns 55 #36 of 78 – 61 #31 of 78
Overall 57 60 61
  • FN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • TTMI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • BHE ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFNTTMIBHESPY
1 month -10.4%-26.9%-11.2% +0.9%
3 months -11.5%-10.8%-1.1% +5.9%
6 months -42.9%-34.0%+1.4% +8.5%
Year to date -19.3%+31.6%+71.7% +13.3%
1 year -16.0%+53.3%+71.9% +12.4%
3 years +141.7%+688.1%+205.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year +34.2%+99.1%+45.1% +23.5%
5 years +282.7%+585.7%+215.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +30.8%+47.0%+25.8% +11.0%
10 years +871.9%+571.0%+193.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year +25.5%+21.0%+11.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFNTTMIBHESPY
Volatility, 1Y 77.8%90.5%45.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 83.2%97.7%47.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.153.822.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.210.591.57 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.8%-66.6%-37.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.8%-59.0%-25.6% -0.9%
52-week high $746.47$221.47$98.67 $779.14
52-week low $314.98$58.45$42.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFNTTMIBHE
P/E now vs peer median 27.8xmedian 33.5x 35.7xmedian 33.5x 47.0xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 2.8x 2.5xmedian 2.8x 0.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 23.1xmedian 19.6x 17.6xmedian 19.6x 15.5xmedian 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3,118xmedian 29.8x 646.9xmedian 29.8x 22.6xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 2.9x 4.7xmedian 2.9x 2.3xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.13median 1.10 0.16median 1.10 -7.03median 1.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFNTTMIBHE
Revenue $4.64B $3.83B $2.95B
Gross profit $556.51M $850.77M $306.25M
Operating income $462.89M $424.51M $102.97M
Net income $473.03M $268.52M $56.03M
Free cash flow $4.22M $14.79M $116.54M
R&D – $32.31M –
EPS (diluted) $13.05 $2.49 $1.54
Cash & equivalents $346.71M $876.35M $290.66M
Total debt – $1.64B $157.84M
Shares (diluted) 36.25M 107.70M 36.40M
Enterprise value $9.41B $7.27B $1.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFNTTMIBHE
P/E 27.8x 35.7x 47.0x
P/FCF 3,118x 646.9x 22.6x
P/Operating cash flow 51.3x 28.5x 15.4x
P/S 2.8x 2.5x 0.9x
P/B 5.4x 4.7x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 5.4x 5.3x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 23.1x 17.6x 15.5x
EV/EBIT 26.5x 24.3x 24.3x
EV/Revenue 2.6x 2.7x 0.8x
EV/FCF 2,911x 698.8x 21.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 47.9x 30.8x 14.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.13 0.16 -7.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFNTTMIBHE
Revenue growth (1Y) 35.7% 37.6% 12.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 17.9% 0.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 34.6% 51.3% 16.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.3% 25.9% 4.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 42.7% 120.0% 22.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.5% 94.7% -0.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 42.3% 103.5% 59.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.0% 230.0% -6.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 42.3% 100.0% 58.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.7% 225.7% -6.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -21.8% 6.6% 53.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.4% – 134.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -98.0% -58.7% 50.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -69.7% – 48.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFNTTMIBHE
Gross margin 12.0% 22.2% 10.4%
EBITDA margin 11.4% 15.3% 5.5%
Operating margin 10.0% 11.1% 3.5%
Pretax margin 12.0% 9.0% 3.1%
Net margin 10.2% 7.0% 1.9%
FCF margin 0.1% 0.4% 4.0%
Operating cash flow margin 5.5% 8.8% 5.8%
Return on equity 19.9% 13.5% 5.0%
Return on assets 12.8% 5.4% 2.5%
Return on invested capital – 10.1% 5.0%
Return on capital employed 20.1% 13.2% 7.6%
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.8x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 1.3x 3.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 1.9% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFNTTMIBHE
Debt / assets – 29.6% 6.8%
Debt / equity – 0.8x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.3x -0.8x
Debt / FCF – 111.2x 1.4x
Liabilities / assets 37.2% 63.3% 51.3%
Equity / assets 62.8% 36.7% 48.7%
Interest coverage – 9.2x 6.9x
Current ratio 2.3x 1.7x 1.9x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.4x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.5x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 8.46 3.14 3.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFNTTMIBHE
Dividend yield – – 0.9%
Net buyback yield 0.0% – 0.6%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFNTTMIBHE
Forward P/E 21.6xFY2027 17.2xFY2026 25.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $16.97FY2027 $5.29FY2026 $2.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.4%FY2027 +115.0%FY2026 +20.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.3% +53.3% +22.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.84BFY2027 $4.26BFY2026 $3.16BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.9%FY2027 +46.4%FY2026 +18.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.9% +60.2% +9.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFNTTMIBHE
Held by institutions 100.0% 92.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 755 638 331
Change in shares held, QoQ -6.6% +0.6% -0.2%
Institutions buying 431 396 190
Institutions selling 245 202 106
Buyers to sellers 1.76 1.96 1.79

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FNTTMIBHE
FN 1.00 0.70 0.66
TTMI 0.70 1.00 0.73
BHE 0.66 0.73 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FN, TTMI and BHE?

Fabrinet (FN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fabrinet (FN) $13.16B, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.57B, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) $2.63B.

Which stock is cheaper, FN, TTMI and BHE?

Fabrinet (FN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fabrinet (FN) 27.8x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 35.7x, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 47.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is cheapest (Fabrinet (FN) 21.6x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 17.2x, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 25.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fabrinet (FN) +35.7%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +37.6%, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) +12.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fabrinet (FN) has the highest net margin (Fabrinet (FN) 10.2%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 1.9%). On return on invested capital, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) leads (Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.1%, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 5.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Benchmark Electronics (BHE) returned the most: Fabrinet (FN) -16.0%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +53.3%, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) +71.9%. Over five years, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) compounded fastest (Fabrinet (FN) +30.8%/yr, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +47.0%/yr, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) +25.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 0.93%. Fabrinet (FN) and Ttm Technologies (TTMI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) has been the steadiest (Fabrinet (FN) 77.8%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.5%, Benchmark Electronics (BHE) 45.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FN, TTMI and BHE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.