FN vs ASX Stock Comparison

Fabrinet and ASE Technology Holding Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FN Fabrinet
$343.51 -17.8% 1M -18.9% 1Y
Market cap
$12.31B
P/E
26.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.64B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

ASE Technology Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (ASE Technology Holding 5, Fabrinet 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFNASXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.31B $93.61B ASX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.0x 46.8x FN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.2x 33.1x FN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +35.7% +18.2% FN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.2% 8.5% FN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 11.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.1x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.95% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.9% +218.2% ASX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +28.9%/yr +42.3%/yr ASX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 77.6% 58.1% ASX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 60/100 ASX

Percentile Scorecard

FNASX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFNASX
Valuation 49 #58 of 112 74 #25 of 94
Growth 61 #43 of 109 79 #20 of 92
Profitability 70 #32 of 104 67 #30 of 90
Financial Health 58 #49 of 116 16 #83 of 99
Shareholder Returns 54 #38 of 81 64 #27 of 73
Overall 58 60
  • FN ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ASX ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFNASXSPY
1 month -17.8%-5.0% -0.2%
3 months -23.6%+23.9% +3.9%
6 months -46.1%+40.0% +8.2%
Year to date -24.5%+161.5% +12.9%
1 year -18.9%+218.2% +12.3%
3 years +126.0%+462.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +31.3%+78.0% +23.3%
5 years +255.8%+482.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year +28.9%+42.3% +10.9%
10 years +752.2%+619.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +23.9%+21.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFNASXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 77.6%58.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 83.2%62.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.142.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.243.75 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.8%-43.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.0%-11.6% -1.2%
52-week high $746.47$47.62 $779.14
52-week low $314.98$13.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFNASX
P/E now vs peer median 26.0xmedian 33.2x 46.8xmedian 45.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 2.8x 4.1xmedian 7.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.5xmedian 20.0x 21.3xmedian 29.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 2,916xmedian 29.8x 7.7xmedian 40.6x
P/B now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 3.0x 7.7xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median 1.05median 1.17 6.02median 2.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFNASX
Revenue $4.64B $22.92B
Gross profit $556.51M $4.46B
Operating income $462.89M $2.24B
Net income $473.03M $2.65B
Free cash flow $4.22M $12.11B
R&D – $1.18B
EPS (diluted) $13.05 $0.88
Cash & equivalents $346.71M $2.86B
Total debt – $31.57B
Shares (diluted) 36.25M 2.21B
Enterprise value $8.56B $82.56B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFNASX
P/E 26.0x 46.8x
P/FCF 2,916x 7.7x
P/Operating cash flow 47.9x 17.3x
P/S 2.7x 4.1x
P/B 5.0x 7.7x
P/Tangible book 5.0x 9.2x
EV/EBITDA 21.5x 21.3x
EV/EBIT 24.7x 44.1x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 4.3x
EV/FCF 2,708x 8.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 44.5x 18.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.05 6.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFNASX
Revenue growth (1Y) 35.7% 18.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 3.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 34.6% 37.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.3% 6.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 42.7% 68.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.5% 4.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 42.3% 83.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 24.0% 3.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 42.3% 81.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.7% 7.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -21.8% 51.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 13.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -98.0% 57.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -69.7% 27.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFNASX
Gross margin 12.0% 19.5%
EBITDA margin 11.4% 20.2%
Operating margin 10.0% 9.8%
Pretax margin 12.0% 10.7%
Net margin 10.2% 8.5%
FCF margin 0.1% 52.9%
Operating cash flow margin 5.5% 23.6%
Return on equity 19.9% 22.0%
Return on assets 12.8% 8.4%
Return on invested capital – 11.1%
Return on capital employed 20.1% 8.4%
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFNASX
Debt / assets – 25.2%
Debt / equity – 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.1x
Debt / FCF – 0.7x
Liabilities / assets 37.2% 63.7%
Equity / assets 62.8% 36.3%
Interest coverage – 9.9x
Current ratio 2.3x 0.3x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 8.11 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFNASX
Dividend yield – 1.0%
Net buyback yield 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFNASX
Forward P/E 20.2xFY2027 33.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $16.97FY2027 $1.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.4%FY2027 +126.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.3% +37.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.84BFY2027 $24.36BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.9%FY2027 +19.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +27.9% +32.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFNASX
Held by institutions 100.0% 6.9%
Institutions holding 755 482
Change in shares held, QoQ -6.6% -2.5%
Institutions buying 431 308
Institutions selling 245 133
Buyers to sellers 1.76 2.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FNASX
FN 1.00 0.56
ASX 0.56 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FN and ASX?

ASE Technology Holding (ASX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fabrinet (FN) $12.31B, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) $93.61B.

Which stock is cheaper, FN and ASX?

Fabrinet (FN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fabrinet (FN) 26.0x, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 46.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fabrinet (FN) is cheapest (Fabrinet (FN) 20.2x, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 33.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fabrinet (FN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fabrinet (FN) +35.7%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +18.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fabrinet (FN) has the highest net margin (Fabrinet (FN) 10.2%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 8.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ASE Technology Holding (ASX) returned the most: Fabrinet (FN) -18.9%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +218.2%. Over five years, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) compounded fastest (Fabrinet (FN) +28.9%/yr, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) +42.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 0.95%. Fabrinet (FN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) has been the steadiest (Fabrinet (FN) 77.6%, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) 58.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do FN and ASX move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.56, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, FN and ASX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ASE Technology Holding (ASX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.