FMCC vs UWMC vs FNMA Stock Comparison

Federal Home Loan Mortgage, UWM Holdings and Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.55 +26.0% 1M -73.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.49B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
19.35%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae 4, Federal Home Loan Mortgage 3, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFMCCUWMCFNMALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.48B $2.49B $24.58B FNMA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1,040x -14.1x 108.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 0.9x 8.2x 1.5x FMCC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.3% +26.1% -3.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.1% -1.0% 0.8% FNMA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 38.9% 6.3% 2.8% FMCC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 10.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 19.35% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -64.4% -73.5% -63.7% FNMA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +34.7%/yr -25.6%/yr +36.7%/yr FNMA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 84.8% 80.1% 85.6% UWMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 36/100 54/100 FMCC

Percentile Scorecard

FMCCUWMCFNMA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFMCCUWMCFNMA
Valuation 92 #14 of 169 20 #136 of 169 55 #77 of 169
Growth 59 #67 of 160 16 #135 of 160 86 #23 of 160
Profitability 70 #46 of 149 32 #102 of 149 69 #47 of 149
Financial Health 27 #115 of 158 18 #130 of 158 6 #149 of 158
Shareholder Returns – 95 #8 of 136 –
Overall 62 36 54
  • FMCC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • FNMA ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFMCCUWMCFNMASPY
1 month -9.2%+26.0%-10.9% -0.2%
3 months -31.1%-17.1%-31.3% +3.9%
6 months -41.5%-57.5%-45.3% +8.2%
Year to date -61.9%-64.6%-61.0% +12.9%
1 year -64.4%-73.5%-63.7% +12.3%
3 years +503.1%-68.9%+474.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +82.1%-32.3%+79.1% +23.3%
5 years +343.7%-77.1%+376.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +34.7%-25.6%+36.7% +10.9%
10 years +141.2%—+147.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.2%—+9.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFMCCUWMCFNMASPY
Volatility, 1Y 84.8%80.1%85.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.0%89.8%74.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.281.481.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.76-0.92-0.74 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.9%-89.5%-78.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -65.9%-74.6%-64.9% -1.2%
52-week high $11.33$6.10$11.95 $779.14
52-week low $2.98$1.00$3.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFMCCUWMCFNMA
P/E now vs peer median -1,040xmedian 11.1x -14.1xmedian 11.1x 108.3xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.6x 0.7xmedian 2.6x 0.8xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.5x 15.3xmedian 13.5x —median 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 7.0x -0.5xmedian 7.0x 0.6xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.7x 2.5xmedian 0.7x 0.2xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 37.71median 0.32 0.28median 0.32 0.54median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFMCCUWMCFNMA
Revenue $23.63B $3.58B $29.17B
Net income $12.95B -$104.96M $15.09B
Free cash flow $14.28B -$4.92B $41.31B
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $-0.11 $0.04
Cash & equivalents $4.32B $498.41M –
Total debt $181.73B $19.23B $4.19T
Shares (diluted) 3.23B 337.53M 5.89B
Enterprise value -$6.26B $1.04B $24.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFMCCUWMCFNMA
P/E -1,040x -14.1x 108.3x
P/FCF 0.9x -0.5x 0.6x
P/Operating cash flow 0.9x -0.5x 0.6x
P/S 0.5x 0.7x 0.8x
P/B 0.2x 2.5x 0.2x
P/Tangible book 0.2x -0.6x 0.2x
EV/EBITDA – 15.3x –
EV/EBIT 1.5x 17.3x 27.9x
EV/Revenue 8.0x 2.2x 144.4x
EV/FCF 13.3x -1.6x 102.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.3x -1.6x 102.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 37.71 0.28 0.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFMCCUWMCFNMA
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.3% 26.1% -3.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.4% 27.3% 0.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 12.5% -175.0% -0.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 17.3% -31.9% 6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 85.0% -287.6% 22,700%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -27.6% -51.2% 200.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.6% -103.1% 485.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.0% -18.2% 16.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1.6% -100.4% 485.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.0% -18.4% 16.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFMCCUWMCFNMA
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 14.6% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 68.2% -3.2% 64.8%
Net margin -0.1% -1.0% 0.8%
FCF margin 60.5% -137.6% 141.6%
Operating cash flow margin 60.5% -135.9% 141.6%
Return on equity 17.1% -8.1% 13.2%
Return on assets 0.4% -0.6% 0.3%
Return on invested capital 38.9% 6.3% 2.8%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 46.3x 2.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFMCCUWMCFNMA
Debt / assets 5.2% 33.5% 96.7%
Debt / equity 2.3x 6.1x 36.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 10.6x –
Debt / FCF 12.7x -1.2x 101.4x
Liabilities / assets 97.8% 94.5% 97.3%
Equity / assets 2.2% 5.5% 2.7%
Interest coverage 1.1x 0.8x 1.1x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFMCCUWMCFNMA
Dividend yield – 19.4% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 19.4% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFMCCUWMCFNMA
Forward P/E 0.9xFY2026 8.2xFY2026 1.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.33FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $2.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.4%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -12.7% +26.3% -7.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $23.94BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026 $31.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.9%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.2% +37.3% -7.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFMCCUWMCFNMA
Held by institutions 0.0% 17.0% 0.0%
Institutions holding 12 290 25
Change in shares held, QoQ +48.6% +31.8% +58.6%
Institutions buying 5 213 13
Institutions selling 1 50 2
Buyers to sellers 5.00 4.26 6.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FMCCUWMCFNMA
FMCC 1.00 0.04 0.97
UWMC 0.04 1.00 0.04
FNMA 0.97 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FMCC, UWMC and FNMA?

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) $12.48B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.49B, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) $24.58B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) -1.3%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) has the highest net margin (Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) -0.1%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 0.8%). On return on invested capital, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) leads (Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) 38.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 2.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) returned the most: Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) -64.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.5%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) -63.7%. Over five years, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) compounded fastest (Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) +34.7%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -25.6%/yr, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) +36.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) 0.00%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 19.35%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 0.00%. Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) and Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, UWM Holdings (UWMC) has been the steadiest (Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) 84.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) 85.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FMCC, UWMC and FNMA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae (FNMA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.