FMCC vs ING vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Federal Home Loan Mortgage, Ing Groep and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AGM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ING Ing Groep Nv
$32.24 -10.6% 1M +33.4% 1Y
Market cap
$93.57B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
4.71%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.48 +18.4% 1M -73.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.37B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
20.27%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Ing Groep leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Ing Groep 3, Federal Home Loan Mortgage 3, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFMCCINGUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.13B $93.57B $2.37B ING
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -525.2x — -13.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 0.9x 12.0x 7.8x FMCC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.6% — +26.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -1.0% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 6.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 10.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 4.71% 20.27% UWMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -60.2% +33.4% -73.8% ING
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +35.5%/yr +16.3%/yr -26.3%/yr FMCC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 85.7% 27.9% 80.1% ING
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 — 35/100 FMCC

Percentile Scorecard

FMCCINGUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFMCCINGUWMC
Valuation 99 #2 of 169 – 19 #138 of 169
Growth 70 #49 of 159 – 16 #134 of 159
Profitability 37 #92 of 146 – 31 #101 of 146
Financial Health – 27 #103 of 140 17 #127 of 153
Shareholder Returns – 93 #23 of 335 94 #9 of 135
Overall 69 – 35
  • FMCC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • ING ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFMCCINGUWMCSPY
1 month +9.4%-10.6%+18.4% +0.7%
3 months -28.0%-7.7%-20.9% +3.7%
6 months -42.8%+11.4%-58.2% +7.1%
Year to date -60.0%+15.1%-66.2% +12.8%
1 year -60.2%+33.4%-73.8% +11.9%
3 years +534.4%+150.5%-69.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +85.2%+35.8%-32.8% +22.8%
5 years +356.2%+113.1%-78.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year +35.5%+16.3%-26.3% +10.9%
10 years +153.7%+145.5%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +9.8%+9.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFMCCINGUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 85.7%27.9%80.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.5%27.0%89.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.231.361.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.701.20-0.92 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -78.9%-47.4%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.2%-13.5%-75.7% -1.2%
52-week high $11.33$37.26$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $2.98$24.17$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFMCCINGUWMC
P/E now vs peer median -525.2xmedian 11.7x —median 12.2x -13.4xmedian 11.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.7x —median 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.1x —median 5.3x 15.1xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 6.5x —median 10.8x -0.5xmedian 6.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median -30.58median 0.33 —median 1.34 0.26median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFMCCINGUWMC
Revenue $24.70B – $3.58B
Net income – – -$104.96M
Free cash flow – – -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 – $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $4.56B $74.19B $498.41M
Total debt – $21.78B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 3.23B 2.99B 337.53M
Enterprise value $13.13B -$448.57B $929.08M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFMCCINGUWMC
P/E -525.2x – -13.4x
P/FCF 0.8x – -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow – – -0.5x
P/S 0.5x – 0.7x
P/B 0.2x 1.5x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 0.2x 1.6x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA – – 15.1x
EV/EBIT – – 17.0x
EV/Revenue 0.5x – 2.2x
EV/FCF – – -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -30.58 – 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFMCCINGUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.6% – 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.1% – 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – – -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 26.5% – -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.2% – -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFMCCINGUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 14.6%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – -3.2%
Net margin – – -1.0%
FCF margin – – -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin – – -135.9%
Return on equity 16.9% – -8.1%
Return on assets 0.4% – -0.6%
Return on invested capital – – 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x – 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFMCCINGUWMC
Debt / assets – 1.6% 33.5%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 10.6x
Debt / FCF – – -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 97.7% 95.3% 94.5%
Equity / assets 2.3% 4.7% 5.5%
Interest coverage – – 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFMCCINGUWMC
Dividend yield – 4.7% 20.3%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.7% 20.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFMCCINGUWMC
Forward P/E 0.9xFY2026 12.0xFY2026 7.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.33FY2026 $2.68FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.4%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -12.7% +18.3% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $23.94BFY2026 $27.20BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.9%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.2% +3.2% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFMCCINGUWMC
Held by institutions 0.0% 4.5% 17.0%
Institutions holding 12 590 291
Change in shares held, QoQ +48.6% -19.0% +31.8%
Institutions buying 5 319 214
Institutions selling 1 155 50
Buyers to sellers 5.00 2.06 4.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FMCCINGUWMC
FMCC 1.00 0.11 0.04
ING 0.11 1.00 0.12
UWMC 0.04 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FMCC, ING and UWMC?

Ing Groep (ING) is the largest by market capitalisation: Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) $13.13B, Ing Groep (ING) $93.57B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.37B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) +3.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ing Groep (ING) returned the most: Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) -60.2%, Ing Groep (ING) +33.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.8%. Over five years, Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) compounded fastest (Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) +35.5%/yr, Ing Groep (ING) +16.3%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) has the highest dividend yield: Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) 0.00%, Ing Groep (ING) 4.71%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 20.27%. Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ing Groep (ING) has been the steadiest (Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC) 85.7%, Ing Groep (ING) 27.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FMCC, ING and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ing Groep (ING) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.