FMBM vs RF vs TFC Stock Comparison

F&M Bank, Regions Financial and Truist Financial Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FCNCA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FMBM F&M Bank Corp
$45.99 +12.4% 1M +71.2% 1Y
Market cap
$159.77M
P/E
11.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$59.23M
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
6 wins
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.41 +5.1% 1M +16.5% 1Y
Market cap
$24.19B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins
TFC Truist Financial Corp
$49.83 +7.8% 1M +13.1% 1Y
Market cap
$59.87B
P/E
12.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.41B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

F&M Bank leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (F&M Bank 6, Regions Financial 4, Truist Financial 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFMBMRFTFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $159.77M $24.19B $59.87B TFC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.1x 11.3x 12.3x FMBM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 10.1x 11.7x RF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.8% +4.4% -3.6% FMBM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 24.3% 28.2% 25.1% RF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.6% 10.2% RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.6x 4.1x RF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.04% 0.04% TFC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +71.2% +16.5% +13.1% FMBM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.0%/yr +3.2%/yr -5.0%/yr FMBM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 16.4% 23.6% 23.9% FMBM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 34/100 24/100 FMBM

Percentile Scorecard

FMBMRFTFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFMBMRFTFC
Valuation 90 #36 of 360 21 #284 of 360 33 #243 of 360
Growth 97 #13 of 344 5 #326 of 344 9 #314 of 344
Profitability – 37 #218 of 345 25 #259 of 345
Financial Health – 49 #173 of 339 16 #285 of 339
Shareholder Returns 23 #271 of 352 60 #142 of 352 37 #222 of 352
Overall 70 34 24
  • FMBM ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • TFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFMBMRFTFCSPY
1 month +12.4%+5.1%+7.8% -5.9%
3 months +12.9%-9.6%-5.3% -4.6%
6 months +35.3%+1.6%+0.2% +0.2%
Year to date +60.0%+4.8%+1.3% +7.5%
1 year +71.2%+16.5%+13.1% +8.2%
3 years +167.4%+83.5%+62.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year +38.8%+22.5%+17.5% +19.0%
5 years +60.7%+16.9%-22.5% +56.5%
5 years, per year +10.0%+3.2%-5.0% +9.4%
10 years +74.9%+170.1%+30.3% +251.5%
10 years, per year +5.7%+10.4%+2.7% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureFMBMRFTFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 16.4%23.6%23.9% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 12.6%25.7%26.4% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.210.640.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 4.330.700.55 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.9%-44.9%-61.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-12.3%-10.7% -5.9%
52-week high $46.00$32.40$55.81 $779.14
52-week low $26.54$24.10$43.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFMBMRFTFC
P/E now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 12.3x 11.3xmedian 12.3x 12.4xmedian 12.3x
P/S now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x 3.1xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x 6.5xmedian 5.0x 7.8xmedian 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.6x 14.5xmedian 10.6x 9.9xmedian 10.6x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x 1.0xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.30median 1.29 5.17median 1.29 -804.28median 1.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFMBMRFTFC
Revenue $59.23M $7.62B $19.41B
Net income $14.41M $2.23B $5.19B
Free cash flow – $1.67B $6.06B
EPS (diluted) $4.02 $2.51 $3.97
Total debt – $7.63B $65.79B
Shares (diluted) 3.58M 857.00M 1.23B
Enterprise value $159.77M $24.19B $59.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFMBMRFTFC
P/E 11.3x 11.3x 12.4x
P/FCF – 14.5x 9.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 13.6x 9.9x
P/S 2.8x 3.2x 3.1x
P/B – 1.3x 1.0x
P/Tangible book – 1.3x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA – 6.5x 7.8x
EV/EBIT 4.5x 6.6x 8.2x
EV/Revenue 2.8x 4.2x 6.5x
EV/FCF – 19.1x 20.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – 17.9x 20.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.30 5.17 -804.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFMBMRFTFC
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.8% 4.4% -3.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.0% -0.7% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 70.0% 7.5% -0.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 39.6% -1.1% -3.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 69.0% 15.6% 5.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 37.8% 2.2% 0.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -33.7% 54.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.7% -14.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -30.0% 54.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.9% -14.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFMBMRFTFC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 64.2% 83.0%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 28.5% 37.4% 30.7%
Net margin 24.3% 28.2% 25.1%
FCF margin – 21.9% 31.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 23.3% 31.2%
Return on equity – 11.8% 8.3%
Return on assets – 1.4% 0.9%
Return on invested capital – 14.6% 10.2%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFMBMRFTFC
Debt / assets – 4.7% 11.9%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.6x 4.1x
Debt / FCF – 4.6x 10.9x
Liabilities / assets – 88.3% 88.9%
Equity / assets – 11.7% 11.1%
Interest coverage – 2.5x 1.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFMBMRFTFC
Dividend yield 2.3% 3.9% 4.2%
Net buyback yield – 4.7% 7.2%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 8.6% 11.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.1% 49.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 55.0% 42.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.8% -4.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.5% -2.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFMBMRFTFC
Forward P/E – 10.1xFY2026 11.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.81FY2026 $4.25FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +20.6%FY2026 +11.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -4.6% +18.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $7.33BFY2026 $19.69BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -3.3%FY2026 -4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +16.2% +1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFMBMRFTFC
Held by institutions – 84.8% 76.7%
Institutions holding – 1,107 1,691
Change in shares held, QoQ – +2.9% +0.8%
Institutions buying – 559 799
Institutions selling – 347 660
Buyers to sellers – 1.61 1.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FMBMRFTFC
FMBM 1.00 0.09 0.14
RF 0.09 1.00 0.87
TFC 0.14 0.87 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FMBM, RF and TFC?

Truist Financial (TFC) is the largest by market capitalisation: F&M Bank (FMBM) $159.77M, Regions Financial (RF) $24.19B, Truist Financial (TFC) $59.87B.

Which stock is cheaper, FMBM, RF and TFC?

F&M Bank (FMBM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (F&M Bank (FMBM) 11.1x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.3x, Truist Financial (TFC) 12.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Regions Financial (RF) is cheapest (Regions Financial (RF) 10.1x, Truist Financial (TFC) 11.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

F&M Bank (FMBM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: F&M Bank (FMBM) +21.8%, Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%, Truist Financial (TFC) -3.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest net margin (F&M Bank (FMBM) 24.3%, Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%, Truist Financial (TFC) 25.1%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%, Truist Financial (TFC) 10.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year F&M Bank (FMBM) returned the most: F&M Bank (FMBM) +71.2%, Regions Financial (RF) +16.5%, Truist Financial (TFC) +13.1%. Over five years, F&M Bank (FMBM) compounded fastest (F&M Bank (FMBM) +10.0%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +3.2%/yr, Truist Financial (TFC) -5.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Truist Financial (TFC) has the highest dividend yield: F&M Bank (FMBM) 0.00%, Regions Financial (RF) 0.04%, Truist Financial (TFC) 0.04%. F&M Bank (FMBM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, F&M Bank (FMBM) has been the steadiest (F&M Bank (FMBM) 16.4%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.6%, Truist Financial (TFC) 23.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FMBM, RF and TFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, F&M Bank (FMBM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.