FLUT vs MGM vs BYD Stock Comparison

Flutter Entertainment, MGM Resorts International and Boyd Gaming Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CDRO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FLUT Flutter Entertainment plc
$78.25 -6.4% 1M -68.0% 1Y
Market cap
$13.68B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.16B
Div. yield
–
Sports Betting Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
MGM MGM Resorts International
$27.98 -14.1% 1M -15.0% 1Y
Market cap
$6.96B
P/E
16.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.76B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
BYD Boyd Gaming Corp
$71.90 +0.9% 1M -9.7% 1Y
Market cap
$5.26B
P/E
2.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.08B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Boyd Gaming leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Boyd Gaming 5, MGM Resorts International 4, Flutter Entertainment 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLUTMGMBYDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.68B $6.96B $5.26B FLUT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -18.1x 16.3x 2.8x BYD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.8x 18.3x 10.7x BYD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.2% +3.2% +0.3% FLUT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.4% 2.4% — MGM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -3.0% 10.6% — MGM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 10.1x 1.7x — MGM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -68.0% -15.0% -9.7% BYD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.4%/yr -9.8%/yr +2.1%/yr BYD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.0% 39.1% 26.3% BYD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 72/100 47/100 MGM

Percentile Scorecard

FLUTMGMBYD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLUTMGMBYD
Valuation 54 #21 of 44 98 #2 of 44 77 #11 of 44
Growth 21 #34 of 43 52 #21 of 43 41 #26 of 43
Profitability 33 #28 of 41 60 #17 of 41 –
Financial Health 39 #29 of 47 63 #18 of 47 –
Shareholder Returns 71 #9 of 29 86 #5 of 29 25 #22 of 29
Overall 44 72 47
  • FLUT ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MGM ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • BYD ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLUTMGMBYDSPY
1 month -6.4%-14.1%+0.9% -0.2%
3 months -28.3%-39.4%-21.1% +3.9%
6 months -28.3%-29.6%-17.2% +8.2%
Year to date -63.6%-23.3%-15.6% +12.9%
1 year -68.0%-15.0%-9.7% +12.3%
3 years -49.5%-18.3%+31.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year -20.4%-6.5%+9.6% +23.3%
5 years -59.1%-40.4%+10.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -16.4%-9.8%+2.1% +10.9%
10 years -31.7%+7.7%+300.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year -3.7%+0.7%+14.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFLUTMGMBYDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.0%39.1%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.6%35.2%26.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.770.850.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.33-0.38-0.37 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.9%-49.3%-35.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -68.0%-44.8%-21.1% -1.2%
52-week high $244.54$50.69$91.15 $779.14
52-week low $74.27$27.98$66.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLUTMGMBYD
P/E now vs peer median -18.2xmedian 17.0x 16.7xmedian 17.0x 2.8xmedian 17.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.9x 0.4xmedian 1.9x 1.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 23.3xmedian 10.8x 5.0xmedian 10.8x —median 10.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 11.2x 4.7xmedian 11.2x -8.7xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.4x 2.1xmedian 2.4x —median 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.56 0.97median 0.56 —median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLUTMGMBYD
Revenue $17.16B $17.76B $4.08B
Gross profit $7.29B $7.84B –
Operating income -$641.00M $1.02B $725.98M
Net income -$866.00M $595.10M $496.64M
Free cash flow $1.24B $1.49B –
R&D $1.08B – –
EPS (diluted) $-4.31 $1.65 –
Cash & equivalents $1.56B $2.55B –
Total debt $11.98B $6.07B –
Shares (diluted) 175.00M 257.76M 74.82M
Enterprise value $7.05B -$2.08B $5.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLUTMGMBYD
P/E -18.2x 16.7x 2.8x
P/FCF 10.9x 4.7x -8.7x
P/Operating cash flow 10.2x 2.9x –
P/S 0.8x 0.4x 1.3x
P/B 1.5x 2.1x –
P/Tangible book 5.4x 3.3x –
EV/EBITDA 23.3x 5.0x –
EV/EBIT -37.4x 10.4x –
EV/Revenue 1.4x 0.6x 1.3x
EV/FCF 19.3x 7.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 18.0x 4.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.97 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLUTMGMBYD
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.2% 3.2% 0.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 6.2% 3.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.2% 1.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 3.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -164.9% -27.1% -13.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 165.5% -10.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -309.2% -28.0% -73.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 135.7% -10.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -310.7% -15.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 17.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -10.7% -2.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -7.2% 15.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 8.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLUTMGMBYD
Gross margin 42.5% 44.2% –
EBITDA margin 6.0% 12.0% –
Operating margin -3.7% 5.7% –
Pretax margin -4.3% 2.8% –
Net margin -4.4% 2.4% –
FCF margin 7.2% 8.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 7.8% 13.9% –
Return on equity -9.5% 20.2% –
Return on assets -3.1% 1.7% –
Return on invested capital -3.0% 10.6% –
Return on capital employed -2.8% 2.7% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.5x 4.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLUTMGMBYD
Debt / assets 42.5% 15.2% –
Debt / equity 1.3x 1.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA 10.1x 1.7x –
Debt / FCF 9.6x 4.1x –
Liabilities / assets 68.2% 91.5% –
Equity / assets 31.8% 8.5% –
Interest coverage – 2.5x –
Current ratio 0.9x 1.3x –
Quick ratio 0.4x 1.1x –
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.8x –
Altman Z-score 1.32 0.76 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLUTMGMBYD
Dividend yield – – 1.1%
Net buyback yield 5.9% 11.0% –
Shareholder yield 5.9% 11.0% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLUTMGMBYD
Forward P/E 17.8xFY2026 18.3xFY2026 10.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.40FY2026 $1.53FY2026 $6.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -44.6%FY2026 -53.8%FY2026 -9.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +49.8% +18.3% +8.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.91BFY2026 $18.44BFY2026 $4.35BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.3% +0.3% -7.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLUTMGMBYD
Held by institutions 83.0% 66.8% 72.8%
Institutions holding 403 661 423
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.0% +0.0% +5.4%
Institutions buying 199 305 186
Institutions selling 170 235 175
Buyers to sellers 1.17 1.30 1.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLUTMGMBYD
FLUT 1.00 0.41 0.39
MGM 0.41 1.00 0.52
BYD 0.39 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLUT, MGM and BYD?

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) $13.68B, MGM Resorts International (MGM) $6.96B, Boyd Gaming (BYD) $5.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, FLUT, MGM and BYD?

Boyd Gaming (BYD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -18.1x, MGM Resorts International (MGM) 16.3x, Boyd Gaming (BYD) 2.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Boyd Gaming (BYD) is cheapest (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) 17.8x, MGM Resorts International (MGM) 18.3x, Boyd Gaming (BYD) 10.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) +15.2%, MGM Resorts International (MGM) +3.2%, Boyd Gaming (BYD) +0.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

MGM Resorts International (MGM) has the highest net margin (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -4.4%, MGM Resorts International (MGM) 2.4%). On return on invested capital, MGM Resorts International (MGM) leads (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -3.0%, MGM Resorts International (MGM) 10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Boyd Gaming (BYD) returned the most: Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -68.0%, MGM Resorts International (MGM) -15.0%, Boyd Gaming (BYD) -9.7%. Over five years, Boyd Gaming (BYD) compounded fastest (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) -16.4%/yr, MGM Resorts International (MGM) -9.8%/yr, Boyd Gaming (BYD) +2.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Boyd Gaming (BYD) has been the steadiest (Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) 51.0%, MGM Resorts International (MGM) 39.1%, Boyd Gaming (BYD) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLUT, MGM and BYD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Boyd Gaming (BYD) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.