FLS vs ITT vs IR Stock Comparison

Flowserve, Itt and Ingersoll Rand Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLS Flowserve Corp
$70.89 -4.0% 1M +34.2% 1Y
Market cap
$9.16B
P/E
24.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.63B
Div. yield
–
Pumps and Valves Industrials
4 wins
ITT Itt Inc.
$194.37 -5.7% 1M +10.0% 1Y
Market cap
$17.52B
P/E
41.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.74B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
3 wins
IR Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$75.57 -0.7% 1M -5.8% 1Y
Market cap
$29.54B
P/E
30.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.94B
Div. yield
0.00%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ingersoll Rand leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ingersoll Rand 5, Flowserve 4, Itt 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLSITTIRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.16B $17.52B $29.54B IR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.7x 41.6x 30.8x FLS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.3x 24.5x 22.6x FLS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.3% +28.1% +7.8% ITT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.0% 8.9% 12.1% IR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.6% 6.0% 7.6% IR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 2.5x 1.8x IR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% ITT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +34.2% +10.0% -5.8% FLS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.6%/yr +15.5%/yr +6.8%/yr FLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.9% 32.9% 33.0% ITT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 47/100 58/100 IR

Percentile Scorecard

FLSITTIR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLSITTIR
Valuation 49 #105 of 203 19 #165 of 203 43 #116 of 203
Growth 68 #61 of 188 65 #67 of 188 70 #57 of 188
Profitability 53 #87 of 183 52 #88 of 183 71 #53 of 183
Financial Health 34 #144 of 217 31 #151 of 217 50 #110 of 217
Shareholder Returns 83 #27 of 153 66 #52 of 153 57 #66 of 153
Overall 57 47 58
  • FLS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ITT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • IR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLSITTIRSPY
1 month -4.0%-5.7%-0.7% -0.2%
3 months -3.5%-2.3%-12.6% +3.9%
6 months -16.7%-9.0%-6.9% +8.2%
Year to date +2.2%+12.0%-4.6% +12.9%
1 year +34.2%+10.0%-5.8% +12.3%
3 years +97.8%+110.6%+27.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +25.5%+28.2%+8.4% +23.3%
5 years +115.2%+105.4%+39.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +16.6%+15.5%+6.8% +10.9%
10 years +62.9%+464.2%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +5.0%+18.9%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFLSITTIRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.9%32.9%33.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.0%32.0%31.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.761.271.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.700.31-0.18 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.0%-38.6%-36.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.0%-12.3%-23.5% -1.2%
52-week high $92.04$221.69$98.76 $779.14
52-week low $52.66$169.49$68.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLSITTIR
P/E now vs peer median 24.4xmedian 25.2x 41.2xmedian 25.2x 30.7xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.9x 3.7xmedian 1.9x 3.7xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.4xmedian 14.0x 21.8xmedian 14.0x 16.7xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.9xmedian 21.7x —median 21.7x 24.0xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 2.3x 3.6xmedian 2.3x 2.9xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.43median 1.32 -13.40median 1.32 2.47median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLSITTIR
Revenue $4.63B $4.74B $7.94B
Gross profit $1.57B $1.67B $3.40B
Operating income $392.30M $680.00M $1.44B
Net income $390.08M $421.50M $966.00M
Free cash flow $411.44M – $1.22B
R&D – $123.80M –
EPS (diluted) $2.89 $4.69 $2.45
Cash & equivalents $731.01M $590.80M $1.17B
Total debt $2.14B $2.87B $4.77B
Shares (diluted) 128.36M 89.80M 391.90M
Enterprise value $6.04B $14.06B $24.67B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLSITTIR
P/E 24.4x 41.2x 30.7x
P/FCF 21.9x – 24.0x
P/Operating cash flow 18.5x – 21.7x
P/S 1.9x 3.7x 3.7x
P/B 3.9x 3.6x 2.9x
P/Tangible book 4.5x 10.0x 4.8x
EV/EBITDA 21.4x 21.8x 16.7x
EV/EBIT 26.5x 28.9x 22.9x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 4.1x 4.1x
EV/FCF 25.3x – 27.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.3x – 24.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.43 -13.40 2.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLSITTIR
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.3% 28.1% 7.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.3% 14.5% 7.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.3% 27.8% 5.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.8% 17.7% 9.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -22.5% -2.1% 28.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.5% 8.0% 13.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 24.0% -18.6% 82.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.9% -0.3% 10.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.5% -28.1% 87.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.1% -3.1% 12.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.6% – -5.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 81.4% – 9.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 3.1% – -6.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 348.1% – 9.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLSITTIR
Gross margin 33.9% 35.2% 42.8%
EBITDA margin 10.5% 19.0% 24.8%
Operating margin 8.5% 14.4% 18.1%
Pretax margin 11.9% 12.8% 15.2%
Net margin 8.0% 8.9% 12.1%
FCF margin 8.9% – 15.4%
Operating cash flow margin 10.5% – 17.0%
Return on equity 16.9% 8.9% 9.4%
Return on assets 6.5% 3.8% 5.3%
Return on invested capital 6.6% 6.0% 7.6%
Return on capital employed 8.6% 7.7% 9.2%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.4x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x – 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 0.8% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLSITTIR
Debt / assets 33.8% 26.0% 26.2%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.6x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.9x 2.5x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 5.2x – 3.9x
Liabilities / assets 63.2% 56.4% 43.7%
Equity / assets 36.8% 43.6% 56.3%
Interest coverage 4.6x 6.8x 5.6x
Current ratio 2.2x 1.3x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.8x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.3x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 3.58 2.76 3.29

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLSITTIR
Dividend yield 1.2% 0.8% 0.1%
Net buyback yield 2.5% 0.7% 2.8%
Shareholder yield 3.7% 1.5% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.5% 3.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 2.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 14.8% -2.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.7% -1.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLSITTIR
Forward P/E 16.3xFY2026 24.5xFY2026 22.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.34FY2026 $7.93FY2026 $3.35FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.2%FY2026 +18.0%FY2026 +0.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.0% +18.2% +21.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.72BFY2026 $5.39BFY2026 $8.35BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.1%FY2026 +36.8%FY2026 +9.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.3% +9.2% +6.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLSITTIR
Held by institutions 100.0% 98.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 584 715 894
Change in shares held, QoQ +14.6% +3.4% -1.5%
Institutions buying 299 326 367
Institutions selling 201 252 360
Buyers to sellers 1.49 1.29 1.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLSITTIR
FLS 1.00 0.63 0.43
ITT 0.63 1.00 0.52
IR 0.43 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLS, ITT and IR?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flowserve (FLS) $9.16B, Itt (ITT) $17.52B, Ingersoll Rand (IR) $29.54B.

Which stock is cheaper, FLS, ITT and IR?

Flowserve (FLS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Flowserve (FLS) 24.7x, Itt (ITT) 41.6x, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 30.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Flowserve (FLS) is cheapest (Flowserve (FLS) 16.3x, Itt (ITT) 24.5x, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 22.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Itt (ITT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flowserve (FLS) -0.3%, Itt (ITT) +28.1%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +7.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) has the highest net margin (Flowserve (FLS) 8.0%, Itt (ITT) 8.9%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 12.1%). On return on invested capital, Ingersoll Rand (IR) leads (Flowserve (FLS) 6.6%, Itt (ITT) 6.0%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 7.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Flowserve (FLS) returned the most: Flowserve (FLS) +34.2%, Itt (ITT) +10.0%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) -5.8%. Over five years, Flowserve (FLS) compounded fastest (Flowserve (FLS) +16.6%/yr, Itt (ITT) +15.5%/yr, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +6.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Itt (ITT) has the highest dividend yield: Flowserve (FLS) 0.00%, Itt (ITT) 0.01%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 0.00%. Flowserve (FLS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Itt (ITT) has been the steadiest (Flowserve (FLS) 48.9%, Itt (ITT) 32.9%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 33.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLS, ITT and IR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ingersoll Rand (IR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.