FLS vs EMR vs GGG Stock Comparison

Flowserve, Emerson Electric and Graco Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FLS Flowserve Corp
$71.79 -3.1% 1M +36.3% 1Y
Market cap
$9.94B
P/E
39.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.70B
Div. yield
–
Pumps and Valves Industrials
3 wins
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$167.78 +5.3% 1M +24.7% 1Y
Market cap
$95.22B
P/E
36.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
1 win
GGG Graco Inc
$67.19 -14.1% 1M -17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$11.02B
P/E
21.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.31B
Div. yield
–
Pumps and Valves Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Graco leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Graco 7, Flowserve 3, Emerson Electric 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFLSEMRGGGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.94B $95.22B $11.02B EMR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.0x 36.9x 21.3x GGG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.5x 24.9x 20.0x FLS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.2% +4.8% +5.4% GGG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.4% 13.8% 22.4% GGG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.1% 10.9% 19.5% GGG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 1.8x 0.0x GGG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +36.3% +24.7% -17.4% FLS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.4%/yr +11.6%/yr -2.2%/yr FLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.9% 31.8% 26.3% GGG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 45/100 72/100 GGG

Percentile Scorecard

FLSEMRGGG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFLSEMRGGG
Valuation 31 #141 of 203 33 #136 of 203 50 #102 of 203
Growth 31 #130 of 188 39 #115 of 188 35 #123 of 188
Profitability 43 #106 of 184 87 #25 of 184 98 #4 of 184
Financial Health 33 #146 of 217 30 #153 of 217 86 #32 of 217
Shareholder Returns 72 #44 of 153 37 #97 of 153 93 #12 of 153
Overall 42 45 72
  • FLS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • GGG ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFLSEMRGGGSPY
1 month -3.1%+5.3%-14.1% +0.9%
3 months +2.7%+15.1%-17.3% +5.9%
6 months -14.8%+22.9%-15.6% +8.5%
Year to date +3.5%+26.4%-18.0% +13.3%
1 year +36.3%+24.7%-17.4% +12.4%
3 years +100.3%+90.6%-8.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +26.1%+24.0%-3.0% +23.5%
5 years +113.5%+73.0%-10.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year +16.4%+11.6%-2.2% +11.0%
10 years +70.1%+235.0%+170.2% +263.4%
10 years, per year +5.5%+12.9%+10.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFLSEMRGGGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.9%31.8%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.2%33.5%31.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.771.540.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.740.78-0.66 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.0%-29.9%-30.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.0%0.0%-29.1% -0.9%
52-week high $92.04$167.78$94.82 $779.14
52-week low $52.66$123.30$66.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFLSEMRGGG
P/E now vs peer median 35.8xmedian 25.4x 36.4xmedian 25.4x 20.9xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.9x 5.0xmedian 1.9x 4.7xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.1xmedian 14.3x 17.0xmedian 14.3x 14.8xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 59.2xmedian 21.8x 27.0xmedian 21.8x 18.0xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 2.2x 4.6xmedian 2.2x 4.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 15.56median 1.41 -0.88median 1.41 12.96median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFLSEMRGGG
Revenue $4.70B $18.64B $2.31B
Gross profit $1.60B $9.91B $1.20B
Operating income $467.63M $4.68B $619.56M
Net income $273.27M $2.58B $517.48M
Free cash flow $153.66M $3.46B $600.10M
R&D – – $82.33M
EPS (diluted) $1.99 $4.59 $3.17
Cash & equivalents $742.15M $2.18B $139.82M
Total debt $2.06B $13.11B $215.70M
Shares (diluted) 127.96M 561.10M 163.02M
Enterprise value $6.91B $87.96B $9.04B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFLSEMRGGG
P/E 35.8x 36.4x 20.9x
P/FCF 59.2x 27.0x 18.0x
P/Operating cash flow 39.6x 23.9x 16.3x
P/S 1.9x 5.0x 4.7x
P/B 3.8x 4.6x 4.4x
P/Tangible book 4.5x 8.0x 5.3x
EV/EBITDA 18.1x 17.0x 14.8x
EV/EBIT 22.3x 22.4x 17.4x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 5.6x 4.7x
EV/FCF 67.8x 30.2x 17.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 45.3x 26.7x 16.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 15.56 -0.88 12.96

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFLSEMRGGG
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.2% 4.8% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.8% 7.6% 1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.0% 5.7% 4.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.2% 11.0% 1.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.1% 9.2% 3.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.4% 13.6% -0.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -42.5% -3.0% 3.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.3% -42.0% -0.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -42.3% -2.2% 7.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.3% -41.6% 1.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -67.3% 4.4% -1.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.7% 10.1% 3.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -75.6% 4.4% -4.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.8% 9.4% 14.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFLSEMRGGG
Gross margin 34.2% 53.2% 52.0%
EBITDA margin 12.3% 33.1% 31.6%
Operating margin 10.0% 25.1% 26.8%
Pretax margin 7.6% 17.6% 27.6%
Net margin 5.4% 13.8% 22.4%
FCF margin 3.3% 18.6% 26.0%
Operating cash flow margin 4.9% 21.0% 28.6%
Return on equity 11.6% 12.7% 20.7%
Return on assets 4.3% 6.1% 16.2%
Return on invested capital 8.1% 10.9% 19.5%
Return on capital employed 9.7% 14.9% 23.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 1.5x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 1.3% 1.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFLSEMRGGG
Debt / assets 32.4% 31.1% 4.1%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.6x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.3x 1.8x 0.0x
Debt / FCF 13.4x 3.8x 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 62.4% 51.7% 24.3%
Equity / assets 37.6% 48.3% 75.7%
Interest coverage 5.1x – 189.0x
Current ratio 2.1x 0.9x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.5x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.2x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 3.65 4.73 10.25

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFLSEMRGGG
Dividend yield 1.2% 1.3% 1.7%
Net buyback yield 1.4% 1.0% 4.3%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 2.3% 6.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 47.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 35.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFLSEMRGGG
Forward P/E 16.5xFY2026 24.9xFY2026 20.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.34FY2026 $6.75FY2026 $3.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.2%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.0% +15.3% +7.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.72BFY2026 $18.13BFY2026 $2.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.1%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026 -1.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.3% +15.3% +12.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFLSEMRGGG
Held by institutions 100.0% 82.1% 91.0%
Institutions holding 584 2,291 730
Change in shares held, QoQ +14.6% +0.9% +0.8%
Institutions buying 299 1,081 337
Institutions selling 201 798 280
Buyers to sellers 1.49 1.35 1.20

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FLSEMRGGG
FLS 1.00 0.60 0.39
EMR 0.60 1.00 0.49
GGG 0.39 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FLS, EMR and GGG?

Emerson Electric (EMR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flowserve (FLS) $9.94B, Emerson Electric (EMR) $95.22B, Graco (GGG) $11.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, FLS, EMR and GGG?

Graco (GGG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Flowserve (FLS) 39.0x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 36.9x, Graco (GGG) 21.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Flowserve (FLS) is cheapest (Flowserve (FLS) 16.5x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.9x, Graco (GGG) 20.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Graco (GGG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flowserve (FLS) +0.2%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Graco (GGG) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Graco (GGG) has the highest net margin (Flowserve (FLS) 5.4%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Graco (GGG) 22.4%). On return on invested capital, Graco (GGG) leads (Flowserve (FLS) 8.1%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, Graco (GGG) 19.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Flowserve (FLS) returned the most: Flowserve (FLS) +36.3%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +24.7%, Graco (GGG) -17.4%. Over five years, Flowserve (FLS) compounded fastest (Flowserve (FLS) +16.4%/yr, Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.6%/yr, Graco (GGG) -2.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Flowserve (FLS) 0.00%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 0.01%, Graco (GGG) 0.00%. Flowserve (FLS) and Graco (GGG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Graco (GGG) has been the steadiest (Flowserve (FLS) 48.9%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%, Graco (GGG) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FLS, EMR and GGG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Graco (GGG) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.