FITB vs UWMC vs MTB Stock Comparison

Fifth Third Bancorp, UWM Holdings and M&T Bank Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (HBAN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp
$53.93 +6.0% 1M +29.9% 1Y
Market cap
$49.88B
P/E
20.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.72B
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.60 +26.0% 1M -72.6% 1Y
Market cap
$572.11M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
1 win
MTB M&T Bank Corp
$222.07 +1.3% 1M +21.5% 1Y
Market cap
$32.77B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.96B
Div. yield
0.03%
Regional Banks Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

M&T Bank leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (M&T Bank 6, Fifth Third Bancorp 4, UWM Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFITBUWMCMTBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $49.88B $572.11M $32.77B FITB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 20.6x -15.4x 11.4x MTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.1x 8.4x 10.8x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.5% +26.1% +5.8% FITB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 20.6% -1.0% 28.8% MTB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.1% 6.3% 12.1% MTB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x 10.6x 2.4x FITB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +29.9% -72.6% +21.5% FITB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.2%/yr -26.1%/yr +7.6%/yr MTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.1% 80.3% 21.5% MTB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 28/100 35/100 49/100 MTB

Percentile Scorecard

FITBUWMCMTB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFITBUWMCMTB
Valuation 14 #311 of 360 17 #139 of 168 46 #196 of 360
Growth 15 #292 of 344 17 #136 of 163 18 #283 of 344
Profitability 16 #289 of 345 30 #108 of 154 72 #99 of 345
Financial Health 37 #214 of 339 17 #134 of 162 41 #201 of 339
Shareholder Returns 59 #145 of 352 93 #10 of 137 68 #114 of 352
Overall 28 35 49
  • FITB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • MTB ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFITBUWMCMTBSPY
1 month +6.0%+26.0%+1.3% -2.0%
3 months -6.6%-17.9%-12.2% -2.2%
6 months +7.2%-53.4%+3.1% +4.2%
Year to date +15.2%-63.5%+10.2% +10.6%
1 year +29.9%-72.6%+21.5% +10.4%
3 years +103.8%-70.5%+81.2% +73.6%
3 years, per year +26.8%-33.4%+21.9% +20.2%
5 years +22.6%-77.9%+44.0% +61.6%
5 years, per year +4.2%-26.1%+7.6% +10.1%
10 years +151.8%—+82.9% +261.3%
10 years, per year +9.7%—+6.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFITBUWMCMTBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.1%80.3%21.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.9%90.1%21.7% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.691.360.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.19-0.901.00 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.6%-89.5%-43.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.1%-73.8%-12.6% -3.2%
52-week high $59.36$6.10$254.11 $779.14
52-week low $41.12$1.00$180.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFITBUWMCMTB
P/E now vs peer median 20.3xmedian 12.4x -14.5xmedian 11.8x 11.3xmedian 12.4x
P/S now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 3.5x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 3.2xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.6xmedian 4.9x 15.5xmedian 13.1x 6.5xmedian 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 11.0x -0.5xmedian 6.0x 8.9xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.2x 2.6xmedian 0.7x 1.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -2.21median 1.33 0.28median 0.33 3.44median 1.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFITBUWMCMTB
Revenue $11.72B $3.58B $9.96B
Net income $2.56B -$104.96M $3.03B
Free cash flow $2.79B -$4.92B $3.60B
EPS (diluted) $2.64 $-0.11 $19.58
Cash & equivalents $4.09B $498.41M –
Total debt $18.14B $6.02B $18.18B
Shares (diluted) 917.10M 337.53M 146.76M
Enterprise value -$38.36B -$1.72B $32.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFITBUWMCMTB
P/E 20.3x -14.5x 11.3x
P/FCF 17.6x -0.5x 8.9x
P/Operating cash flow 14.2x -0.5x 8.4x
P/S 4.2x 0.7x 3.2x
P/B 1.5x 2.6x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.5x -0.6x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 5.6x 15.5x 6.5x
EV/EBIT 6.1x 17.4x 6.9x
EV/Revenue 4.0x 2.3x 5.0x
EV/FCF 16.7x -1.6x 14.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.5x -1.7x 13.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.21 0.28 3.44

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFITBUWMCMTB
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.5% 26.1% 5.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.8% 27.3% -12.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 6.3% -175.0% 12.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.1% -31.9% 0.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -21.7% -287.6% 23.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -9.2% -51.2% 3.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.9% -103.1% 21.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.5% -18.2% 0.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -4.6% -100.4% 21.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -11.6% -18.4% 0.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFITBUWMCMTB
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 71.3% 14.6% 77.1%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 27.8% -3.2% 39.4%
Net margin 20.6% -1.0% 28.8%
FCF margin 23.8% -137.6% 36.1%
Operating cash flow margin 29.5% -135.9% 38.2%
Return on equity 7.6% -8.1% 10.8%
Return on assets 0.9% -0.6% 1.4%
Return on invested capital 11.1% 6.3% 12.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 46.3x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 2.2% 1.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFITBUWMCMTB
Debt / assets 6.0% 33.5% 8.3%
Debt / equity 0.5x 6.1x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x 10.6x 2.4x
Debt / FCF 6.5x -1.2x 5.1x
Liabilities / assets 88.9% 94.5% 87.3%
Equity / assets 11.1% 5.5% 12.7%
Interest coverage 1.7x 0.8x 2.2x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFITBUWMCMTB
Dividend yield 3.0% 18.7% 2.7%
Net buyback yield – – 8.0%
Shareholder yield 3.0% 18.7% 10.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 29.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 25.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 2.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 2.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFITBUWMCMTB
Forward P/E 17.1xFY2026 8.4xFY2026 10.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.15FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $20.48FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -10.8%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026 +20.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +61.3% +26.3% -0.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.18BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026 $10.60BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +34.7%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.3% +37.3% -4.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFITBUWMCMTB
Held by institutions 90.8% 17.0% 90.2%
Institutions holding 1,307 291 1,150
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.9% +31.8% -0.4%
Institutions buying 692 214 524
Institutions selling 409 50 392
Buyers to sellers 1.69 4.28 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FITBUWMCMTB
FITB 1.00 0.19 0.87
UWMC 0.19 1.00 0.19
MTB 0.87 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FITB, UWMC and MTB?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) $49.88B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $572.11M, M&T Bank (MTB) $32.77B.

Which stock is cheaper, FITB, UWMC and MTB?

M&T Bank (MTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 20.6x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -15.4x, M&T Bank (MTB) 11.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 17.1x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 8.4x, M&T Bank (MTB) 10.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +32.5%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, M&T Bank (MTB) +5.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

M&T Bank (MTB) has the highest net margin (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 20.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, M&T Bank (MTB) 28.8%). On return on invested capital, M&T Bank (MTB) leads (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 11.1%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, M&T Bank (MTB) 12.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) returned the most: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +29.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -72.6%, M&T Bank (MTB) +21.5%. Over five years, M&T Bank (MTB) compounded fastest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +4.2%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.1%/yr, M&T Bank (MTB) +7.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 0.00%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%, M&T Bank (MTB) 0.03%. Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) and UWM Holdings (UWMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, M&T Bank (MTB) has been the steadiest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 25.1%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.3%, M&T Bank (MTB) 21.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FITB, UWMC and MTB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, M&T Bank (MTB) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.