FITB vs USB vs WFC Stock Comparison

Fifth Third Bancorp, Us Bancorp and Wells Fargo & Company Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EWBC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp
$54.44 +6.8% 1M +30.3% 1Y
Market cap
$49.04B
P/E
18.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.16B
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
2 wins
USB Us Bancorp De
$60.65 +4.3% 1M +30.0% 1Y
Market cap
$92.65B
P/E
11.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$29.58B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$84.81 +5.4% 1M -1.4% 1Y
Market cap
$252.09B
P/E
11.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
0.02%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Wells Fargo & Company leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Wells Fargo & Company 7, Us Bancorp 3, Fifth Third Bancorp 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFITBUSBWFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $49.04B $92.65B $252.09B WFC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.4x 11.9x 11.5x WFC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.3x 11.7x 10.8x WFC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.1% +6.7% +5.4% FITB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.2% 26.4% 25.2% USB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.9% 12.6% 15.1% WFC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.8x 2.8x WFC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.02% USB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +30.3% +30.0% -1.4% FITB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.6%/yr +0.1%/yr +10.6%/yr WFC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 24.9% 22.2% 25.6% USB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 47/100 51/100 WFC

Percentile Scorecard

FITBUSBWFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFITBUSBWFC
Valuation 11 #322 of 361 39 #221 of 361 47 #191 of 361
Growth 26 #114 of 153 52 #74 of 153 53 #73 of 153
Profitability 47 #69 of 128 77 #30 of 128 65 #45 of 128
Financial Health 55 #63 of 140 14 #121 of 140 13 #122 of 140
Shareholder Returns 70 #100 of 335 53 #159 of 335 78 #74 of 335
Overall 42 47 51
  • FITB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • USB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • WFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFITBUSBWFCSPY
1 month +6.8%+4.3%+5.4% +0.7%
3 months -3.8%-3.6%-0.7% +3.7%
6 months +7.2%+7.0%+3.1% +7.1%
Year to date +16.3%+13.7%-9.0% +12.8%
1 year +30.3%+30.0%-1.4% +11.9%
3 years +132.8%+93.7%+115.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +32.6%+24.7%+29.1% +22.8%
5 years +25.1%+0.5%+65.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year +4.6%+0.1%+10.6% +10.9%
10 years +151.9%+35.9%+83.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +9.7%+3.1%+6.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFITBUSBWFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 24.9%22.2%25.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.8%23.2%29.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.690.610.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.221.36-0.05 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.6%-54.7%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.3%-7.3%-12.0% -1.2%
52-week high $59.36$65.41$96.39 $779.14
52-week low $41.12$45.47$73.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFITBUSBWFC
P/E now vs peer median 18.7xmedian 12.2x 12.1xmedian 12.2x 11.6xmedian 12.2x
P/S now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x 2.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.3x 7.6xmedian 5.3x 6.1xmedian 5.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.8x 7.5xmedian 10.8x 8.8xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 1.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -2.94median 1.34 0.99median 1.34 0.81median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFITBUSBWFC
Revenue $10.16B $29.58B $87.23B
Net income $2.81B $8.17B $22.97B
Free cash flow – $12.53B $28.91B
EPS (diluted) $2.91 $5.01 $7.20
Cash & equivalents $4.37B – –
Total debt $22.27B $96.01B $221.04B
Shares (diluted) 916.00M 1.56B 3.05B
Enterprise value -$33.19B $92.65B $252.09B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFITBUSBWFC
P/E 18.7x 12.1x 11.6x
P/FCF – 7.5x 8.8x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.5x 8.8x
P/S 4.9x 3.2x 2.9x
P/B 1.4x 1.4x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 1.5x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – 7.6x 6.1x
EV/EBIT 6.2x 7.8x 6.7x
EV/Revenue 4.7x 6.4x 5.5x
EV/FCF – 15.2x 16.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 15.2x 16.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.94 0.99 0.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFITBUSBWFC
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.1% 6.7% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.6% 3.2% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 20.2% 18.4% 9.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.3% 12.1% 6.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -10.3% 19.9% 16.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -6.3% 12.2% 14.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 68.8% 303.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.9% -0.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 68.8% 303.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.9% -0.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFITBUSBWFC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 85.2% 89.8%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 35.4% 34.5% 31.7%
Net margin 26.2% 26.4% 25.2%
FCF margin – 42.3% 33.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 42.3% 33.1%
Return on equity 10.0% 12.2% 12.9%
Return on assets 1.1% 1.1% 1.0%
Return on invested capital 12.9% 12.6% 15.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.5x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFITBUSBWFC
Debt / assets 7.4% 13.2% 9.8%
Debt / equity 0.6x 1.4x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.8x 2.8x
Debt / FCF – 7.7x 7.6x
Liabilities / assets 88.5% 90.6% 92.1%
Equity / assets 11.5% 9.4% 7.9%
Interest coverage 1.9x 1.7x 1.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFITBUSBWFC
Dividend yield 3.0% 3.5% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – 0.7% 5.5%
Shareholder yield 3.0% 4.2% 7.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 39.5% 24.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 25.7% 19.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.2% 5.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.8% 6.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFITBUSBWFC
Forward P/E 17.3xFY2026 11.7xFY2026 10.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.15FY2026 $5.17FY2026 $7.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -10.8%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +61.3% +18.8% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.18BFY2026 $30.11BFY2026 $94.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +34.7%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.3% +16.7% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFITBUSBWFC
Held by institutions 90.8% 81.6% 76.8%
Institutions holding 1,305 2,069 2,879
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.9% +2.1% +1.1%
Institutions buying 692 965 1,293
Institutions selling 407 761 1,135
Buyers to sellers 1.70 1.27 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FITBUSBWFC
FITB 1.00 0.84 0.60
USB 0.84 1.00 0.69
WFC 0.60 0.69 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FITB, USB and WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) $49.04B, Us Bancorp (USB) $92.65B, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $252.09B.

Which stock is cheaper, FITB, USB and WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 18.4x, Us Bancorp (USB) 11.9x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 11.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is cheapest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 17.3x, Us Bancorp (USB) 11.7x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 10.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +17.1%, Us Bancorp (USB) +6.7%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Us Bancorp (USB) has the highest net margin (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 26.2%, Us Bancorp (USB) 26.4%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.2%). On return on invested capital, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) leads (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 12.9%, Us Bancorp (USB) 12.6%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 15.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) returned the most: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +30.3%, Us Bancorp (USB) +30.0%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) -1.4%. Over five years, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) compounded fastest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +4.6%/yr, Us Bancorp (USB) +0.1%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +10.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Us Bancorp (USB) has the highest dividend yield: Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 0.00%, Us Bancorp (USB) 0.03%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 0.02%. Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Us Bancorp (USB) has been the steadiest (Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 24.9%, Us Bancorp (USB) 22.2%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FITB, USB and WFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.