FIS vs GTLB vs IIIV Stock Comparison

Fidelity National Information Services, Gitlab and i3 Verticals Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ROP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GTLB Gitlab Inc.
$48.99 -5.1% 1M +6.9% 1Y
Market cap
$8.04B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
1 win
IIIV i3 Verticals, Inc.
$19.36 +29.4% 1M -35.7% 1Y
Market cap
$368.01M
P/E
43.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$218.16M
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fidelity National Information Services leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fidelity National Information Services 7, i3 Verticals 3, Gitlab 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFISGTLBIIIVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.82B $8.04B $368.01M FIS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.3x -152.6x 43.2x FIS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.6x 54.4x 19.4x FIS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.6% +23.0% +4.1% FIS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.8% -5.0% 3.9% FIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.3% — 0.8% FIS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.4x — 3.1x IIIV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.06% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -54.6% +6.9% -35.7% GTLB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.7%/yr -16.9%/yr -2.9%/yr IIIV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.8% 59.4% 46.3% FIS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 68/100 69/100 IIIV

Percentile Scorecard

FISGTLBIIIV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFISGTLBIIIV
Valuation 95 #6 of 100 55 #57 of 124 85 #16 of 100
Growth 85 #16 of 99 83 #20 of 114 51 #49 of 99
Profitability 64 #35 of 96 61 #44 of 111 59 #40 of 96
Financial Health 19 #91 of 112 69 #41 of 128 51 #55 of 112
Shareholder Returns 76 #17 of 67 71 #22 of 74 100 #1 of 67
Overall 68 68 69
  • FIS ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • GTLB ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • IIIV ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFISGTLBIIIVSPY
1 month -12.1%-5.1%+29.4% -5.9%
3 months -31.4%+37.3%-11.8% -4.6%
6 months -37.8%+89.0%-15.5% +0.2%
Year to date -55.8%+30.5%-23.1% +7.5%
1 year -54.6%+6.9%-35.7% +8.2%
3 years -43.2%+18.1%-1.6% +68.3%
3 years, per year -17.2%+5.7%-0.5% +19.0%
5 years -74.2%-60.3%-13.9% +56.5%
5 years, per year -23.7%-16.9%-2.9% +9.4%
10 years -61.0%—— +251.5%
10 years, per year -9.0%—— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureFISGTLBIIIVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.8%59.4%46.3% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.9%60.0%54.8% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.010.960.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.250.12-0.77 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.9%-85.2%-58.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.5%-15.5%-35.7% -5.9%
52-week high $67.54$57.97$30.11 $779.14
52-week low $29.38$19.42$13.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFISGTLBIIIV
P/E now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 24.7x -156.9xmedian 39.4x 44.1xmedian 24.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.8x 7.7xmedian 4.0x 2.4xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 16.5x -260.6xmedian 34.1x 17.5xmedian 16.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.4xmedian 15.3x 38.1xmedian 22.7x 10.3xmedian 15.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.7x 8.4xmedian 2.9x 1.3xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.15median 0.77 -4.25median 1.32 0.95median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFISGTLBIIIV
Revenue $12.94B $1.06B $218.16M
Gross profit $4.64B $904.84M –
Operating income $2.12B -$90.20M $5.94M
Net income $3.47B -$54.73M $11.89M
Free cash flow $2.78B $213.67M $49.93M
R&D – $304.14M –
EPS (diluted) $6.70 $-0.31 $0.44
Cash & equivalents $740.00M $226.49M $2.65M
Total debt $20.77B – $114.28M
Shares (diluted) 517.00M 168.70M 19.54M
Enterprise value $11.98B $2.96B $254.02M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFISGTLBIIIV
P/E 4.4x -156.9x 44.1x
P/FCF 5.4x 38.1x 10.3x
P/Operating cash flow 5.1x 36.5x 9.8x
P/S 1.2x 7.7x 2.4x
P/B 0.9x 8.4x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 8.4x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA 7.7x -260.6x 17.5x
EV/EBIT 16.6x -76.3x 105.6x
EV/Revenue 2.7x 6.5x 2.9x
EV/FCF 12.7x 32.2x 12.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.0x 30.8x 12.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.15 -4.25 0.95

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFISGTLBIIIV
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.6% 23.0% 4.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.5% 28.1% 4.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 20.9% 19.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 26.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.2% 10.7% 3.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.2% 25.2% 32.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 2,137% -405.1% -91.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.9% 34.8% 47.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 2,205% -470.3% -88.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 29.3% 36.9% 46.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 11.7% 433.4% 662.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 186.5% 310.4% 15.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.1% 496.3% 935.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 374.6% 1,057% 18.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFISGTLBIIIV
Gross margin 35.8% 85.8% –
EBITDA margin 35.5% -2.5% 16.4%
Operating margin 16.4% -8.5% 2.7%
Pretax margin 11.1% -4.7% 6.9%
Net margin 26.8% -5.0% 3.9%
FCF margin 21.5% 20.3% 22.9%
Operating cash flow margin 22.7% 21.2% 24.0%
Return on equity 21.5% -5.4% 3.1%
Return on assets 7.9% -3.2% 2.1%
Return on invested capital 4.3% – 0.8%
Return on capital employed 6.2% -8.8% 1.0%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.6x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x -4.1x 4.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 21.8% 8.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFISGTLBIIIV
Debt / assets 47.5% – 18.2%
Debt / equity 1.3x – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.4x – 3.1x
Debt / FCF 7.5x – 2.3x
Liabilities / assets 62.9% 41.5% 36.1%
Equity / assets 37.1% 58.5% 63.9%
Interest coverage 3.0x – –
Current ratio 0.5x 2.4x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.4x 2.3x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.9x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 0.01 7.14 2.04

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFISGTLBIIIV
Dividend yield 5.9% – –
Net buyback yield 2.9% 1.5% 26.5%
Shareholder yield 8.7% 1.5% 26.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 25.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 32.2% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 7.5% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFISGTLBIIIV
Forward P/E 4.6xFY2026 54.4xFY2026 19.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.37FY2026 $0.90FY2026 $1.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +10.8%FY2026 -6.2%FY2026 -4.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +6.8% +21.1% +17.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.98BFY2026 $1.08BFY2026 $211.26MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.5%FY2026 +12.6%FY2026 -0.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.6% +16.3% +11.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFISGTLBIIIV
Held by institutions 98.7% 95.7% 80.1%
Institutions holding 858 398 134
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% +4.9% -12.0%
Institutions buying 414 231 57
Institutions selling 334 123 60
Buyers to sellers 1.24 1.88 0.95

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FISGTLBIIIV
FIS 1.00 0.27 0.27
GTLB 0.27 1.00 0.22
IIIV 0.27 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FIS, GTLB and IIIV?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) $14.82B, Gitlab (GTLB) $8.04B, i3 Verticals (IIIV) $368.01M.

Which stock is cheaper, FIS, GTLB and IIIV?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 4.3x, Gitlab (GTLB) -152.6x, i3 Verticals (IIIV) 43.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) is cheapest (Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 4.6x, Gitlab (GTLB) 54.4x, i3 Verticals (IIIV) 19.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) +23.6%, Gitlab (GTLB) +23.0%, i3 Verticals (IIIV) +4.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has the highest net margin (Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 26.8%, Gitlab (GTLB) -5.0%, i3 Verticals (IIIV) 3.9%). On return on invested capital, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) leads (Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 4.3%, i3 Verticals (IIIV) 0.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Gitlab (GTLB) returned the most: Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -54.6%, Gitlab (GTLB) +6.9%, i3 Verticals (IIIV) -35.7%. Over five years, i3 Verticals (IIIV) compounded fastest (Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -23.7%/yr, Gitlab (GTLB) -16.9%/yr, i3 Verticals (IIIV) -2.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 0.06%, Gitlab (GTLB) 0.00%, i3 Verticals (IIIV) 0.00%. Gitlab (GTLB) and i3 Verticals (IIIV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has been the steadiest (Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 43.8%, Gitlab (GTLB) 59.4%, i3 Verticals (IIIV) 46.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FIS, GTLB and IIIV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.