FIGR vs RKT vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Figure Technology Solutions, Rocket Companies and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FNMA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc.
$11.73 -3.3% 1M -33.4% 1Y
Market cap
$32.55B
P/E
69.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.02B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
5 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.45 +17.9% 1M -74.8% 1Y
Market cap
$477.60M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Rocket Companies leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Rocket Companies 5, Figure Technology Solutions 4, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFIGRRKTUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.86B $32.55B $477.60M RKT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 20.5x 69.1x -12.9x FIGR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.7x 18.9x 6.9x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +88.8% +101.7% +26.1% RKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 33.5% 4.7% -1.0% FIGR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.9% 2.4% 6.3% FIGR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 10.8x 10.6x UWMC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -42.1% -33.4% -74.8% RKT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -6.6%/yr -27.0%/yr RKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.0% 58.8% 79.4% RKT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 41/100 36/100 FIGR

Percentile Scorecard

FIGRRKTUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFIGRRKTUWMC
Valuation 15 #144 of 170 17 #142 of 170 20 #137 of 170
Growth 96 #7 of 165 90 #17 of 165 16 #139 of 165
Profitability 72 #44 of 155 34 #103 of 155 31 #108 of 155
Financial Health 81 #32 of 163 47 #87 of 163 18 #134 of 163
Shareholder Returns 3 #133 of 137 17 #114 of 137 97 #5 of 137
Overall 54 41 36
  • FIGR ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • RKT ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UWMC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFIGRRKTUWMCSPY
1 month -33.1%-3.3%+17.9% -1.0%
3 months -15.9%-10.2%-21.2% +2.9%
6 months -27.9%-24.8%-61.6% +6.4%
Year to date -43.2%-39.4%-66.9% +11.4%
1 year -42.1%-33.4%-74.8% +13.1%
3 years —+59.8%-70.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year —+16.9%-33.4% +21.5%
5 years —-29.0%-79.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year —-6.6%-27.0% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureFIGRRKTUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.0%58.8%79.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.5%57.9%89.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.652.261.45 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.45-0.57-0.94 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.6%-64.8%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -68.6%-50.0%-76.2% -2.5%
52-week high $73.91$23.44$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $23.19$10.53$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFIGRRKTUWMC
P/E now vs peer median 21.7xmedian 11.0x 70.6xmedian 11.0x -13.2xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 2.6x 4.4xmedian 2.6x 0.7xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.1x 30.3xmedian 13.1x 15.0xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -60.0xmedian 6.9x -57.1xmedian 6.9x -0.5xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 0.7x 1.9xmedian 0.7x 2.4xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.31 0.45median 0.31 0.26median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFIGRRKTUWMC
Revenue $708.87M $10.02B $3.58B
Gross profit $620.58M – –
Operating income $201.41M – –
Net income $237.39M $471.36M -$104.96M
Free cash flow -$86.49M -$772.00M -$4.92B
R&D $62.64M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.96 $0.17 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $1.44B $3.10B $498.41M
Total debt $963.50M $92.61B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 246.97M 2.84B 337.53M
Enterprise value -$337.40M $18.22B -$1.82B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFIGRRKTUWMC
P/E 21.7x 70.6x -13.2x
P/FCF -60.0x -57.1x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow -60.0x -69.5x -0.5x
P/S 7.3x 4.4x 0.7x
P/B 3.7x 1.9x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 4.1x 9.5x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA – 30.3x 15.0x
EV/EBIT 23.4x 39.5x 16.9x
EV/Revenue 6.6x 6.8x 2.2x
EV/FCF -54.5x -88.5x -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -54.5x -107.8x -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.45 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFIGRRKTUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 88.8% 101.7% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 39.7% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 90.5% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 229.5% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 279.9% 4,530% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 39.3% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 36.1% 5,670% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 157.4% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 70.4% -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -30.9% -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 65.1% -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -32.0% -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFIGRRKTUWMC
Gross margin 87.5% – –
EBITDA margin – 22.5% 14.6%
Operating margin 28.4% – –
Pretax margin 28.3% 6.6% -3.2%
Net margin 33.5% 4.7% -1.0%
FCF margin -12.2% -7.7% -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin -12.2% -6.3% -135.9%
Return on equity 17.6% 2.0% -8.1%
Return on assets 8.3% 0.8% -0.6%
Return on invested capital 8.9% 2.4% 6.3%
Return on capital employed 12.7% – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.4x -1.3x 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue 15.4% 4.3% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFIGRRKTUWMC
Debt / assets 31.9% 45.0% 33.5%
Debt / equity 0.7x 1.2x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 10.8x 10.6x
Debt / FCF -11.1x -35.5x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 53.2% 61.4% 94.5%
Equity / assets 46.8% 38.6% 5.5%
Interest coverage 3.2x 1.6x 0.8x
Current ratio 1.9x – –
Quick ratio 1.2x – –
Cash ratio 1.1x – –
Altman Z-score 2.81 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFIGRRKTUWMC
Dividend yield – – 20.7%
Net buyback yield -13.3% -0.2% –
Shareholder yield -13.3% -0.2% 20.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFIGRRKTUWMC
Forward P/E 21.7xFY2026 18.9xFY2026 6.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.07FY2026 $0.62FY2026 $0.21FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +98.1%FY2026 +121.4%FY2026 +75.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +35.5% +24.2% +19.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $841.27MFY2026 $11.29BFY2026 $2.23BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +63.4%FY2026 +68.5%FY2026 -7.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +50.2% +6.7% +30.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFIGRRKTUWMC
Held by institutions 66.8% 50.4% 79.7%
Institutions holding 307 793 290
Change in shares held, QoQ +16.9% +16.2% +31.8%
Institutions buying 196 429 213
Institutions selling 82 259 50
Buyers to sellers 2.39 1.66 4.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FIGRRKTUWMC
FIGR 1.00 0.18 0.15
RKT 0.18 1.00 0.51
UWMC 0.15 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FIGR, RKT and UWMC?

Rocket Companies (RKT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) $4.86B, Rocket Companies (RKT) $32.55B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $477.60M.

Which stock is cheaper, FIGR, RKT and UWMC?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 20.5x, Rocket Companies (RKT) 69.1x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -12.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 21.7x, Rocket Companies (RKT) 18.9x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rocket Companies (RKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) +88.8%, Rocket Companies (RKT) +101.7%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) has the highest net margin (Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 33.5%, Rocket Companies (RKT) 4.7%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) leads (Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 8.9%, Rocket Companies (RKT) 2.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rocket Companies (RKT) returned the most: Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) -42.1%, Rocket Companies (RKT) -33.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -74.8%. Over five years, Rocket Companies (RKT) compounded fastest (Rocket Companies (RKT) -6.6%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -27.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rocket Companies (RKT) has been the steadiest (Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) 94.0%, Rocket Companies (RKT) 58.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 79.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FIGR, RKT and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rocket Companies (RKT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.