FIG vs TEAM vs PERF Stock Comparison

Figma, Atlassian and Perfect Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SNPS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FIG Figma, Inc.
$24.64 +13.2% 1M -53.8% 1Y
Market cap
$12.41B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.20B
Div. yield
–
Creative Software Technology
1 win
TEAM Atlassian Corp
$227.61 +16.7% 1M +37.9% 1Y
Market cap
$58.13B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$6.57B
Div. yield
–
Productivity Software Technology
2 wins
PERF Perfect Corp.
$2.00 +4.2% 1M +1.0% 1Y
Market cap
$170.12M
P/E
35.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$71.07M
Div. yield
–
Creative Software Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Perfect leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Perfect 6, Atlassian 2, Figma 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFIGTEAMPERFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.41B $58.13B $170.12M TEAM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -8.7x -1,080x 35.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 88.0x 40.4x 28.6x PERF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +42.2% +26.0% +10.4% FIG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -119.8% -0.8% 8.1% PERF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% 0.8% PERF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.7x -67.9x PERF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.8% +37.9% +1.0% TEAM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -11.7%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.6% 75.0% 47.8% PERF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 32/100 43/100 60/100 PERF

Percentile Scorecard

FIGTEAMPERF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFIGTEAMPERF
Valuation 3 #29 of 30 7 #28 of 30 79 #7 of 30
Growth 39 #17 of 27 77 #7 of 27 35 #18 of 27
Profitability 4 #25 of 26 32 #18 of 26 36 #17 of 26
Financial Health 81 #7 of 32 42 #19 of 32 90 #4 of 32
Shareholder Returns – 56 #8 of 17 –
Overall 32 43 60
  • FIG ranked among 33 companies in Workplace Software
  • TEAM ranked among 33 companies in Workplace Software
  • PERF ranked among 33 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFIGTEAMPERFSPY
1 month +13.2%+16.7%+4.2% -1.0%
3 months +16.5%+162.0%+4.2% +2.9%
6 months +41.0%+218.1%+22.0% +6.4%
Year to date -34.1%+40.4%+10.5% +11.4%
1 year -53.8%+37.9%+1.0% +13.1%
3 years —+19.4%-27.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year —+6.1%-10.1% +21.5%
5 years —-46.2%— +67.7%
5 years, per year —-11.7%— +10.9%
10 years —+683.8%— +255.2%
10 years, per year —+22.9%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureFIGTEAMPERFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.6%75.0%47.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 69.6%63.3%47.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.020.810.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.720.510.02 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.2%-87.5%-88.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.8%0.0%-4.3% -2.5%
52-week high $53.36$227.61$2.09 $779.14
52-week low $16.84$57.15$1.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFIGTEAMPERF
P/E now vs peer median -9.1xmedian 32.3x -1,100xmedian 32.3x 35.3xmedian 32.3x
P/S now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 2.4x 9.0xmedian 2.4x 2.4xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -8.0xmedian 11.5x 409.9xmedian 11.5x 7.0xmedian 11.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.2x 44.9xmedian 14.2x 15.6xmedian 14.2x
P/B now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 2.7x 55.9xmedian 2.7x 1.1xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.77 -21.06median 0.77 1.33median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFIGTEAMPERF
Revenue $1.20B $6.57B $71.07M
Gross profit $971.13M $5.58B $56.66M
Operating income -$1.45B $10.36M $1.26M
Net income -$1.41B -$53.83M $8.43M
Free cash flow – $1.32B $10.88M
R&D $1.13B $3.27B $14.93M
EPS (diluted) $-2.72 $-0.21 $0.06
Cash & equivalents $445.85M $1.24B $125.62M
Total debt – $3.96B $7.81M
Shares (diluted) 527.46M 260.16M 101.85M
Enterprise value $5.92B $51.41B -$417.85M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFIGTEAMPERF
P/E -9.1x -1,100x 35.3x
P/FCF – 44.9x 15.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 43.8x 16.2x
P/S 10.9x 9.0x 2.4x
P/B 8.8x 55.9x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 8.9x 94.6x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA -8.0x 409.9x 7.0x
EV/EBIT -7.9x 5,694x 12.6x
EV/Revenue 9.5x 9.0x 0.2x
EV/FCF – 44.7x 1.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 43.6x 1.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -21.06 1.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFIGTEAMPERF
Revenue growth (1Y) 42.2% 26.0% 10.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 23.0% 13.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 31.3% 29.0% 14.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 24.3% 12.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -63.0% 107.9% 157.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 26.6% 26.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -96.2% 79.0% 37.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 52.0% 26.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 15.4% 78.9% -1.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 52.2% 26.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -7.3% -32.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 15.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -6.8% -31.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFIGTEAMPERF
Gross margin 81.1% 84.8% 79.7%
EBITDA margin -119.1% 2.2% 3.2%
Operating margin -120.9% 0.2% 1.8%
Pretax margin -115.4% 0.3% 10.0%
Net margin -119.8% -0.8% 8.1%
FCF margin – 20.1% 15.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 20.6% 14.8%
Return on equity -94.2% -5.6% 5.4%
Return on assets -59.9% -0.9% 4.3%
Return on invested capital – 0.0% 0.8%
Return on capital employed -93.8% 0.4% 0.8%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.1x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -25.1x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 24.4% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFIGTEAMPERF
Debt / assets – 16.2% 4.0%
Debt / equity – 0.9x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.7x -67.9x
Debt / FCF – 0.8x 0.7x
Liabilities / assets 37.1% 82.7% 19.4%
Equity / assets 62.9% 17.3% 80.6%
Interest coverage – 0.2x 66.4x
Current ratio 2.5x 0.8x 4.6x
Quick ratio 2.3x 0.7x 4.6x
Cash ratio 2.1x 0.3x 4.4x
Altman Z-score 7.05 6.57 1.28

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFIGTEAMPERF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 3.0% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFIGTEAMPERF
Forward P/E 88.0xFY2026 40.4xFY2027 28.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.28FY2026 $5.63FY2027 $0.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -37.8%FY2026 -3.8%FY2027 +40.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.4% +24.2% +14.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.43BFY2026 $7.29BFY2027 $76.52MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +35.0%FY2026 +10.9%FY2027 +10.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +34.9% +23.0% +8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFIGTEAMPERF
Held by institutions 81.2% 99.7% –
Institutions holding 373 696 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.2% +4.9% –
Institutions buying 257 434 –
Institutions selling 64 193 –
Buyers to sellers 4.02 2.25 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FIGTEAMPERF
FIG 1.00 0.56 0.07
TEAM 0.56 1.00 0.13
PERF 0.07 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FIG, TEAM and PERF?

Atlassian (TEAM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Figma (FIG) $12.41B, Atlassian (TEAM) $58.13B, Perfect (PERF) $170.12M.

Which company is growing faster?

Figma (FIG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Figma (FIG) +42.2%, Atlassian (TEAM) +26.0%, Perfect (PERF) +10.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Perfect (PERF) has the highest net margin (Figma (FIG) -119.8%, Atlassian (TEAM) -0.8%, Perfect (PERF) 8.1%). On return on invested capital, Perfect (PERF) leads (Atlassian (TEAM) 0.0%, Perfect (PERF) 0.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Atlassian (TEAM) returned the most: Figma (FIG) -53.8%, Atlassian (TEAM) +37.9%, Perfect (PERF) +1.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Perfect (PERF) has been the steadiest (Figma (FIG) 74.6%, Atlassian (TEAM) 75.0%, Perfect (PERF) 47.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FIG, TEAM and PERF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Perfect (PERF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.