FIG vs QTWO vs U Stock Comparison

Figma, Q2 Holdings and Unity Software Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SSYS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FIG Figma, Inc.
$23.51 +12.7% 1M -55.9% 1Y
Market cap
$12.11B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.20B
Div. yield
–
Creative Software Technology
1 win
QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc.
$69.77 +24.3% 1M +12.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.25B
P/E
46.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$846.20M
Div. yield
–
Digital Banking Technology
7 wins
U Unity Software Inc.
$40.33 -3.0% 1M +8.2% 1Y
Market cap
$17.58B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.03B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Q2 Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Q2 Holdings 7, Unity Software 1, Figma 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFIGQTWOULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.11B $4.25B $17.58B U
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -8.4x 46.2x -29.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 84.0x 25.2x — QTWO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +42.2% +13.9% +14.0% FIG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -119.8% 10.9% -29.0% QTWO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 10.3% -17.2% QTWO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 13.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -55.9% +12.1% +8.2% QTWO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -2.2%/yr -22.5%/yr QTWO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.9% 44.6% 75.0% QTWO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 32/100 71/100 47/100 QTWO

Percentile Scorecard

FIGQTWOU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFIGQTWOU
Valuation 7 #27 of 29 58 #42 of 99 60 #50 of 124
Growth 39 #17 of 27 87 #13 of 94 41 #67 of 113
Profitability 4 #25 of 26 85 #14 of 90 49 #57 of 110
Financial Health 80 #7 of 31 70 #32 of 105 49 #66 of 129
Shareholder Returns – 52 #30 of 61 35 #44 of 67
Overall 32 71 47
  • FIG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • QTWO ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • U ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFIGQTWOUSPY
1 month +12.7%+24.3%-3.0% -0.8%
3 months +2.5%+20.1%+32.5% +3.5%
6 months +35.8%+43.7%+51.4% +7.0%
Year to date -37.1%-3.3%-8.7% +12.2%
1 year -55.9%+12.1%+8.2% +13.0%
3 years —+137.5%+57.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+33.4%+16.5% +23.1%
5 years —-10.4%-72.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-2.2%-22.5% +11.0%
10 years —+147.4%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+9.5%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFIGQTWOUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.9%44.6%75.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 69.9%42.1%82.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.010.312.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.750.270.11 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.2%-76.6%-93.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.8%-7.6%-18.5% -1.8%
52-week high $53.14$75.49$49.47 $779.14
52-week low $16.84$42.09$17.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFIGQTWOU
P/E now vs peer median -8.6xmedian 31.9x 47.4xmedian 20.6x -30.1xmedian 38.1x
P/S now vs peer median 10.4xmedian 2.4x 5.1xmedian 2.3x 8.7xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -7.6xmedian 11.5x 26.8xmedian 15.4x -117.7xmedian 35.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.2x 20.4xmedian 16.4x 33.0xmedian 27.1x
P/B now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 3.0x 6.8xmedian 1.9x 5.8xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.77 1.08median 1.05 -1.53median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFIGQTWOU
Revenue $1.20B $846.20M $2.03B
Gross profit $971.13M $482.24M $1.32B
Operating income -$1.45B $84.90M -$616.00M
Net income -$1.41B $91.99M -$588.01M
Free cash flow – $213.25M $538.39M
R&D $1.13B $162.56M $1.03B
EPS (diluted) $-2.72 $1.41 $-1.34
Cash & equivalents $445.85M $99.92M $2.35B
Total debt – – $557.17M
Shares (diluted) 527.46M 65.42M 437.90M
Enterprise value $5.62B $2.76B $9.13B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFIGQTWOU
P/E -8.6x 47.4x -30.1x
P/FCF – 20.4x 33.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 19.2x 32.0x
P/S 10.4x 5.1x 8.7x
P/B 8.4x 6.8x 5.8x
P/Tangible book 8.5x 7.6x 6.2x
EV/EBITDA -7.6x 26.8x -117.7x
EV/EBIT -7.5x 50.0x -25.9x
EV/Revenue 9.0x 5.0x 7.9x
EV/FCF – 19.9x 29.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.8x 28.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.08 -1.53

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFIGQTWOU
Revenue growth (1Y) 42.2% 13.9% 14.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 12.2% 3.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 31.3% 23.3% -0.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 19.8% 2.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -63.0% 3,719% -23.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 41.2% 13.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -96.2% 1,783% -35.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 45.7% 15.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 15.4% 1,905% -29.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 43.8% 19.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 26.8% 45.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 49.8% 110.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 23.6% 51.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 54.3% 83.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFIGQTWOU
Gross margin 81.1% 57.0% 64.9%
EBITDA margin -119.1% 18.7% -6.7%
Operating margin -120.9% 10.0% -30.4%
Pretax margin -115.4% 11.5% -29.0%
Net margin -119.8% 10.9% -29.0%
FCF margin – 25.2% 26.5%
Operating cash flow margin – 26.7% 27.3%
Return on equity -94.2% 14.7% -19.5%
Return on assets -59.9% 8.3% -8.9%
Return on invested capital – 10.3% -17.2%
Return on capital employed -93.8% 10.0% -12.3%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.5x -0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 10.0% 16.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFIGQTWOU
Debt / assets – – 8.4%
Debt / equity – – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 13.2x
Debt / FCF – – 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 37.1% 33.6% 54.4%
Equity / assets 62.9% 66.4% 45.6%
Interest coverage – 17.8x -25.5x
Current ratio 2.5x 0.9x 2.0x
Quick ratio 2.3x 0.7x 1.9x
Cash ratio 2.1x 0.4x 1.5x
Altman Z-score 6.63 8.38 2.28

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFIGQTWOU
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 2.6% -0.6%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.6% -0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFIGQTWOU
Forward P/E 84.0xFY2026 25.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.28FY2026 $2.77FY2026 $-0.70FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -37.8%FY2026 +8.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +21.4% +30.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.43BFY2026 $850.92MFY2026 $2.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +35.0%FY2026 +7.1%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +34.9% +17.5% +30.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFIGQTWOU
Held by institutions 81.2% 100.0% 84.7%
Institutions holding 373 328 558
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.2% +4.9% +8.0%
Institutions buying 257 180 306
Institutions selling 64 109 161
Buyers to sellers 4.02 1.65 1.90

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FIGQTWOU
FIG 1.00 0.50 0.28
QTWO 0.50 1.00 0.26
U 0.28 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FIG, QTWO and U?

Unity Software (U) is the largest by market capitalisation: Figma (FIG) $12.11B, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) $4.25B, Unity Software (U) $17.58B.

Which company is growing faster?

Figma (FIG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Figma (FIG) +42.2%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) +13.9%, Unity Software (U) +14.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Q2 Holdings (QTWO) has the highest net margin (Figma (FIG) -119.8%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 10.9%, Unity Software (U) -29.0%). On return on invested capital, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) leads (Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 10.3%, Unity Software (U) -17.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Q2 Holdings (QTWO) returned the most: Figma (FIG) -55.9%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) +12.1%, Unity Software (U) +8.2%. Over five years, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) compounded fastest (Q2 Holdings (QTWO) -2.2%/yr, Unity Software (U) -22.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) has been the steadiest (Figma (FIG) 74.9%, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) 44.6%, Unity Software (U) 75.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FIG, QTWO and U?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Q2 Holdings (QTWO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.