FGL vs SUNE vs CNTM Stock Comparison

Founder, SUNation Energy and ConnectM Technology Solutions Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PRIM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FGL Founder Group Ltd
$1.45 -65.6% 1M -96.8% 1Y
Market cap
$478.99K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials
SUNE SUNation Energy, Inc.
$1.95 -17.7% 1M +25.8% 1Y
Market cap
$12.70M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$61.56M
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

ConnectM Technology Solutions leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (ConnectM Technology Solutions 5, SUNation Energy 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFGLSUNECNTMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $478.99K $12.70M $25.45M CNTM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.2x -2.4x 10.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +10.3% +23.6% CNTM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -8.5% 6.3% CNTM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -18.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -96.8% +25.8% -37.2% SUNE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 515.4% 232.9% 132.3% CNTM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 33/100 56/100 CNTM

Percentile Scorecard

FGLSUNECNTM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFGLSUNECNTM
Valuation 73 #15 of 52 33 #35 of 52 85 #20 of 124
Growth – 64 #14 of 37 71 #33 of 113
Profitability – 25 #28 of 37 56 #49 of 109
Financial Health 27 #42 of 57 41 #34 of 57 14 #110 of 127
Shareholder Returns – 0 #26 of 26 –
Overall – 33 56
  • FGL ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • SUNE ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • CNTM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFGLSUNECNTMSPY
1 month -65.6%-17.7%-18.2% +0.9%
3 months +54.3%-9.7%-24.4% +5.9%
6 months -20.3%+61.2%-36.4% +8.5%
Year to date -91.0%+89.3%-65.7% +13.3%
1 year -96.8%+25.8%-37.2% +12.4%
3 years —-100.0%-98.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year —-97.4%-76.5% +23.5%

Risk

MeasureFGLSUNECNTMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 515.4%232.9%132.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 204.0%143.2%132.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.872.41-0.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.190.11-0.28 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-100.0%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -97.2%-66.8%-71.9% -0.9%
52-week high $52.09$5.88$16.00 $779.14
52-week low $0.15$0.78$3.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFGLSUNECNTM
P/E now vs peer median -0.2xmedian 27.7x -2.4xmedian 27.7x 10.9xmedian 37.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 0.8x 0.2xmedian 0.8x 0.7xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.4x -6.1xmedian 12.4x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 23.7x -7.0xmedian 23.7x —median 26.6x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.5x 0.6xmedian 2.5x 1.6xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.57 -0.03median 0.57 0.41median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFGLSUNECNTM
Revenue – $61.56M $36.02M
Gross profit – $21.99M $11.16M
Operating income – -$4.86M -$12.45M
Net income – -$5.22M $2.42M
Free cash flow – -$1.82M –
EPS (diluted) – $-0.82 $0.03
Cash & equivalents $19.76M $3.06M $2.39M
Total debt $42.13M $4.84M $56.72M
Shares (diluted) 330.34K 6.40M 72.32M
Enterprise value -$29.41M -$4.64M $15.45M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFGLSUNECNTM
P/E -0.2x -2.4x 10.9x
P/FCF 0.0x -7.0x –
P/Operating cash flow – -7.2x –
P/S 0.0x 0.2x 0.7x
P/B 0.1x 0.6x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 0.1x 1.1x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA – -6.1x –
EV/EBIT – -3.0x -3.2x
EV/Revenue – 0.2x 1.1x
EV/FCF – -8.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow – -8.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.03 0.41

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFGLSUNECNTM
Revenue growth (1Y) – 10.3% 23.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -1.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 9.4% 35.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 0.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 61.0% 19.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 20.1% -62.4%
Net income growth (1Y) – 77.5% 108.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 28.1% 31.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – 89.4% 106.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 94.2% 26.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 72.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -0.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 71.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 6.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFGLSUNECNTM
Gross margin – 35.7% 31.0%
EBITDA margin – -3.8% –
Operating margin – -7.9% -34.6%
Pretax margin – -8.4% -41.0%
Net margin – -8.5% 6.3%
FCF margin – -2.9% –
Operating cash flow margin – -2.9% –
Return on equity – -25.6% 27.8%
Return on assets – -12.9% 5.4%
Return on invested capital – -18.9% –
Return on capital employed – -18.2% -149.0%
Asset turnover – 1.5x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFGLSUNECNTM
Debt / assets 33.4% 11.8% 31.1%
Debt / equity 2.1x 0.2x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.8x –
Debt / FCF – -2.7x –
Liabilities / assets 84.1% 49.8% 70.1%
Equity / assets 15.9% 50.2% 29.9%
Interest coverage – -8.1x -7.6x
Current ratio 1.2x 0.8x 0.2x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.5x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – -0.70 -1.83

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFGLSUNECNTM
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -21.3% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% -21.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFGLSUNECNTM
EPS, next fiscal year – $-120,381.72FY2024 $-3.87FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $76.76MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +114.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +15.7%

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FGLSUNECNTM
FGL 1.00 0.04 -0.02
SUNE 0.04 1.00 -0.05
CNTM -0.02 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FGL, SUNE and CNTM?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Founder (FGL) $478.99K, SUNation Energy (SUNE) $12.70M, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) $25.45M.

Which company is growing faster?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: SUNation Energy (SUNE) +10.3%, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) +23.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) has the highest net margin (SUNation Energy (SUNE) -8.5%, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year SUNation Energy (SUNE) returned the most: Founder (FGL) -96.8%, SUNation Energy (SUNE) +25.8%, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) -37.2%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) has been the steadiest (Founder (FGL) 515.4%, SUNation Energy (SUNE) 232.9%, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 132.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FGL, SUNE and CNTM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.