FENC vs AMPH vs GRML Stock Comparison

Fennec Pharmaceuticals, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals and Greenland Mines Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TEVA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd
$5.79 -60.5% 1M +929.2% 1Y
Market cap
$14.09M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Amphastar Pharmaceuticals 5, Fennec Pharmaceuticals 2, Greenland Mines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFENCAMPHGRMLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $358.06M $1.11B $14.09M AMPH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -54.2x 14.1x -0.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.0x 8.2x — AMPH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +61.4% +1.0% — FENC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -12.3% 10.8% — AMPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.4% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.9% +3.9% +929.2% GRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.3%/yr +6.8%/yr — AMPH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 64.1% 54.3% 445.7% AMPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 73/100 34/100 FENC

Percentile Scorecard

FENCAMPHGRML

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFENCAMPHGRML
Valuation 59 #255 of 626 99 #8 of 626 13 #542 of 626
Growth 93 #43 of 604 43 #347 of 604 2 #590 of 604
Profitability 84 #88 of 555 87 #72 of 555 68 #179 of 555
Financial Health 57 #285 of 658 37 #412 of 658 78 #147 of 658
Shareholder Returns – 99 #4 of 368 7 #342 of 368
Overall 73 73 34
  • FENC ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • AMPH ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • GRML ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFENCAMPHGRMLSPY
1 month -4.2%-2.5%-60.5% -0.8%
3 months -0.6%+32.8%+2,947.4% +3.5%
6 months +48.2%+17.6%+1,129.8% +7.0%
Year to date +31.8%-4.9%+1,903.5% +12.2%
1 year +12.9%+3.9%+929.2% +13.0%
3 years +48.4%-42.9%-45.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +14.1%-17.1%-18.5% +23.1%
5 years +12.2%+38.7%— +68.6%
5 years, per year +2.3%+6.8%— +11.0%
10 years +415.2%+40.1%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +17.8%+3.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFENCAMPHGRMLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 64.1%54.3%445.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 59.6%66.4%158.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.320.582.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.200.072.08 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.6%-74.0%-99.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.6%-13.4%-61.1% -1.8%
52-week high $12.78$29.40$14.89 $779.14
52-week low $5.77$16.87$0.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFENCAMPHGRML
P/E now vs peer median -53.1xmedian 17.1x 14.2xmedian 17.1x -0.7xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 8.8x 1.5xmedian 8.8x —median 8.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.1x 8.0xmedian 17.1x —median 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.0x 7.1xmedian 18.0x -1.0xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 2.1x 1.4xmedian 2.1x 0.3xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -1.25median 0.31 -5.53median 0.31 0.01median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFENCAMPHGRML
Revenue $53.77M $730.02M –
Gross profit $49.65M $348.11M –
Operating income -$3.74M $114.29M -$18.67M
Net income -$6.60M $78.55M -$21.77M
Free cash flow – $152.89M -$14.22M
R&D $274.00K $94.57M $1.28M
EPS (diluted) $-0.18 $1.78 $-8.60
Cash & equivalents $41.25M $223.61M $9.34M
Total debt – $612.05M $2.07M
Shares (diluted) 36.43M 44.23M 2.53M
Enterprise value $239.37M -$31.23M -$19.78M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFENCAMPHGRML
P/E -53.1x 14.2x -0.7x
P/FCF – 7.1x -1.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 5.9x -1.0x
P/S 6.6x 1.5x –
P/B 8.4x 1.4x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 8.4x 1.5x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA – 8.0x –
EV/EBIT -84.1x 12.3x -0.3x
EV/Revenue 5.8x 1.9x –
EV/FCF – 9.2x -0.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – 7.6x -0.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.25 -5.53 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFENCAMPHGRML
Revenue growth (1Y) 61.4% 1.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 118.1% 10.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 65.9% -3.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 8.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 61.4% -37.1% -127.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 46.2% -4.5% -166.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.1% -41.7% -91.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 37.0% -8.3% -125.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 58.3% -36.5% 48.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 42.6% -2.6% -48.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 15.6% -158.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 12.1% -236.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 36.3% -158.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 15.0% -236.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFENCAMPHGRML
Gross margin 92.4% 47.7% –
EBITDA margin – 23.9% –
Operating margin -7.0% 15.7% –
Pretax margin -8.2% 14.0% –
Net margin -12.3% 10.8% –
FCF margin – 20.9% –
Operating cash flow margin – 25.3% –
Return on equity -11.4% 10.2% -39.8%
Return on assets -6.1% 4.6% -34.9%
Return on invested capital – 6.4% –
Return on capital employed -6.2% 8.0% -30.5%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.4x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 14.8% 4.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFENCAMPHGRML
Debt / assets – 35.1% 0.5%
Debt / equity – 0.8x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.8x –
Debt / FCF – 4.0x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 44.0% 55.9% 10.9%
Equity / assets 56.0% 44.1% 89.1%
Interest coverage -2.5x 4.4x -2,872x
Current ratio 5.8x 2.4x 10.1x
Quick ratio 5.2x 1.7x 7.7x
Cash ratio 3.3x 1.1x 7.7x
Altman Z-score 3.70 2.12 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFENCAMPHGRML
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 9.0% -49.5%
Shareholder yield – 9.0% -49.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFENCAMPHGRML
Forward P/E 35.0xFY2026 8.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.29FY2026 $3.09FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -4.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +241.4% +9.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $75.58MFY2026 $790.23MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +69.3%FY2026 +9.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +28.3% -5.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFENCAMPHGRML
Held by institutions 46.6% 64.8% 12.0%
Institutions holding 107 209 47
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% -11.7% +96.3%
Institutions buying 71 96 34
Institutions selling 19 74 2
Buyers to sellers 3.74 1.30 17.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FENCAMPHGRML
FENC 1.00 0.08 0.06
AMPH 0.08 1.00 0.02
GRML 0.06 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FENC, AMPH and GRML?

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) $358.06M, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) $1.11B, Greenland Mines (GRML) $14.09M.

Which company is growing faster?

Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) +61.4%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +1.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) has the highest net margin (Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) -12.3%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 10.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenland Mines (GRML) returned the most: Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) +12.9%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +3.9%, Greenland Mines (GRML) +929.2%. Over five years, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) compounded fastest (Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) +2.3%/yr, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +6.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) has been the steadiest (Fennec Pharmaceuticals (FENC) 64.1%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 54.3%, Greenland Mines (GRML) 445.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FENC, AMPH and GRML?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.