FCX vs HBM vs LCU Stock Comparison

Freeport-Mcmoran, Hudbay Minerals and Lion Copper Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SCCO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FCX Freeport-Mcmoran Inc
$62.94 -12.6% 1M +50.9% 1Y
Market cap
$90.38B
P/E
30.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.87B
Div. yield
0.57%
Copper Basic Materials
3 wins
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc.
$21.70 -20.2% 1M +35.6% 1Y
Market cap
$8.58B
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.47B
Div. yield
0.14%
Copper Basic Materials
7 wins
LCU Lion Copper Corp.
$4.63 -3.7% 1M +90.5% 1Y
Market cap
$73.95M
P/E
10.3x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Hudbay Minerals leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Hudbay Minerals 7, Freeport-Mcmoran 3, Lion Copper 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFCXHBMLCULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.38B $8.58B $73.95M FCX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.7x 12.5x 10.3x LCU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.1x 14.7x — HBM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.2% +12.1% — HBM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.4% 27.7% — HBM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.6% 12.6% — HBM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 0.1x — HBM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.57% 0.14% — FCX
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +50.9% +35.6% +90.5% LCU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.5%/yr +26.7%/yr +4.1%/yr HBM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.4% 63.1% 153.3% FCX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 73/100 48/100 HBM

Percentile Scorecard

FCXHBMLCU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFCXHBMLCU
Valuation 57 #71 of 165 84 #27 of 165 76 #41 of 165
Growth 50 #76 of 150 91 #15 of 150 81 #30 of 150
Profitability 66 #42 of 122 88 #16 of 122 16 #103 of 122
Financial Health 26 #123 of 166 52 #81 of 166 42 #96 of 166
Shareholder Returns 39 #66 of 107 50 #54 of 107 24 #82 of 107
Overall 48 73 48
  • FCX ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • HBM ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LCU ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFCXHBMLCUSPY
1 month -12.6%-20.2%-3.7% -2.3%
3 months -1.1%-7.3%-14.3% -0.7%
6 months +13.3%-0.3%-28.5% +4.8%
Year to date +23.9%+9.3%+22.5% +10.3%
1 year +50.9%+35.6%+90.5% +10.3%
3 years +79.1%+364.7%+185.8% +73.0%
3 years, per year +21.4%+66.9%+41.9% +20.1%
5 years +64.6%+226.8%+22.5% +61.9%
5 years, per year +10.5%+26.7%+4.1% +10.1%
10 years +492.7%+404.7%+243.0% +258.6%
10 years, per year +19.5%+17.6%+13.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFCXHBMLCUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.4%63.1%153.3% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.2%68.3%184.8% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.242.790.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.050.560.59 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.7%-63.3%-73.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.2%-31.9%-46.7% -3.5%
52-week high $79.91$31.87$8.68 $779.14
52-week low $38.65$14.58$2.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFCXHBMLCU
P/E now vs peer median 30.7xmedian 12.5x 12.5xmedian 12.5x 10.3xmedian 12.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 2.9x 3.5xmedian 2.9x —median 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.6xmedian 7.3x 5.7xmedian 7.3x —median 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 51.3xmedian 14.6x 9.8xmedian 14.6x 5.7xmedian 14.6x
P/B now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 2.1x 1.8xmedian 2.1x 3.6xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 2.61median 0.28 0.04median 0.28 0.20median 0.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFCXHBMLCU
Revenue $25.87B $2.47B –
Gross profit $7.00B $972.40M –
Operating income $6.92B $1.10B -$14.76M
Net income $4.59B $680.00M -$2.10M
Free cash flow $1.76B $880.20M $12.93M
R&D $198.00M $58.40M –
EPS (diluted) $2.04 $1.72 $0.45
Cash & equivalents $4.08B $890.90M –
Total debt $9.39B $1.13B $2.61M
Shares (diluted) 1.44B 396.65M 15.93M
Enterprise value $86.54B $5.90B $73.95M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFCXHBMLCU
P/E 30.7x 12.5x 10.3x
P/FCF 51.3x 9.8x 5.7x
P/Operating cash flow 15.3x 9.8x 5.7x
P/S 3.5x 3.5x –
P/B 2.8x 1.8x 3.6x
P/Tangible book 2.8x 1.8x 3.6x
EV/EBITDA 10.6x 5.7x –
EV/EBIT 13.8x 8.0x -5.2x
EV/Revenue 3.7x 3.6x –
EV/FCF 54.3x 10.0x 5.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.2x 10.0x 5.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.61 0.04 0.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFCXHBMLCU
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.2% 12.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.7% 24.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -8.8% 32.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.5% 71.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 0.1% 89.3% -273.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 126.5% -60.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 6.8% 139.9% 59.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 11.4% 410.6% 19.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 53.1% 122.6% 290.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.8% 346.8% 50.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -10.1% 1.5% 327.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.0% – 197.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.3% 2,912% 326.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 66.3% 115.3% 197.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFCXHBMLCU
Gross margin 27.1% 39.4% –
EBITDA margin 35.1% 61.9% –
Operating margin 26.8% 44.7% –
Pretax margin 25.7% 47.3% –
Net margin 11.4% 27.7% –
FCF margin 6.8% 35.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 22.8% 35.6% –
Return on equity 14.4% 16.3% -66.5%
Return on assets 7.7% 43.1% -29.7%
Return on invested capital 11.6% 12.6% –
Return on capital employed 13.2% – -55.8%
Asset turnover 0.4x 1.6x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.3x -6.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 3.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFCXHBMLCU
Debt / assets 15.7% 78.4% 6.0%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.2x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 0.1x –
Debt / FCF 5.3x 1.3x 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 46.1% -231.7% 53.0%
Equity / assets 53.9% 331.7% 47.0%
Interest coverage – 14.9x –
Current ratio 2.1x – 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.7x – –
Cash ratio 0.6x – –
Altman Z-score 3.00 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFCXHBMLCU
Dividend yield 0.6% 0.1% –
Net buyback yield 0.2% -0.4% -5.6%
Shareholder yield 0.8% -0.2% -5.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 18.9% 1.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 49.1% 1.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.1% -260.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.2% -59.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFCXHBMLCU
Forward P/E 20.1xFY2026 14.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.13FY2026 $1.48FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +76.8%FY2026 +120.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +45.4% +27.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.47BFY2026 $3.05BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +9.9%FY2026 +37.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +36.0% +18.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFCXHBMLCU
Held by institutions 86.6% 83.1% –
Institutions holding 1,882 319 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +10.9% –
Institutions buying 1,029 200 –
Institutions selling 603 82 –
Buyers to sellers 1.71 2.44 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FCXHBMLCU
FCX 1.00 0.84 -0.01
HBM 0.84 1.00 -0.01
LCU -0.01 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FCX, HBM and LCU?

Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) $90.38B, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) $8.58B, Lion Copper (LCU) $73.95M.

Which stock is cheaper, FCX, HBM and LCU?

Lion Copper (LCU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) 30.7x, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 12.5x, Lion Copper (LCU) 10.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) is cheapest (Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) 20.1x, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 14.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Hudbay Minerals (HBM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) +0.2%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) +12.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hudbay Minerals (HBM) has the highest net margin (Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) 11.4%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 27.7%). On return on invested capital, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) leads (Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) 11.6%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 12.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lion Copper (LCU) returned the most: Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) +50.9%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) +35.6%, Lion Copper (LCU) +90.5%. Over five years, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) compounded fastest (Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) +10.5%/yr, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) +26.7%/yr, Lion Copper (LCU) +4.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) has the highest dividend yield: Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) 0.57%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 0.14%. Lion Copper (LCU) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) has been the steadiest (Freeport-Mcmoran (FCX) 48.4%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 63.1%, Lion Copper (LCU) 153.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FCX, HBM and LCU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.