FCNCA vs RF vs UWMC Stock Comparison

First Citizens Bancshares, Regions Financial and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TFC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.87 +7.3% 1M +19.9% 1Y
Market cap
$24.36B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
6 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.48 +18.4% 1M -73.8% 1Y
Market cap
$529.91M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Regions Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Regions Financial 6, First Citizens Bancshares 3, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFCNCARFUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.13B $24.36B $529.91M FCNCA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.8x 11.3x -14.3x RF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.1x 10.3x 7.8x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +4.4% +26.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 28.2% -1.0% RF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.6% 6.3% RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.6x 10.6x RF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.04% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +33.4% +19.9% -73.8% FCNCA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +24.0%/yr +4.0%/yr -26.3%/yr FCNCA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.2% 23.4% 80.1% RF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 28/100 41/100 35/100 RF

Percentile Scorecard

FCNCARFUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFCNCARFUWMC
Valuation 69 #111 of 361 23 #278 of 361 19 #138 of 169
Growth – 9 #139 of 153 16 #134 of 159
Profitability – 49 #66 of 128 31 #101 of 146
Financial Health 14 #120 of 140 58 #59 of 140 17 #127 of 153
Shareholder Returns 2 #330 of 335 64 #123 of 335 94 #9 of 135
Overall 28 41 35
  • FCNCA ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFCNCARFUWMCSPY
1 month +14.9%+7.3%+18.4% +0.7%
3 months +10.5%-6.4%-20.9% +3.7%
6 months +20.1%+1.1%-58.2% +7.1%
Year to date +11.0%+6.5%-66.2% +12.8%
1 year +33.4%+19.9%-73.8% +11.9%
3 years +71.6%+103.0%-69.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +19.7%+26.6%-32.8% +22.8%
5 years +192.7%+21.9%-78.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year +24.0%+4.0%-26.3% +10.9%
10 years +722.7%+171.1%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +23.5%+10.5%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFCNCARFUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.2%23.4%80.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.3%25.6%89.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.440.651.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.230.85-0.92 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.8%-44.9%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-10.9%-75.7% -1.2%
52-week high $2,382.50$32.40$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $1,766.01$24.07$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFCNCARFUWMC
P/E now vs peer median 12.0xmedian 12.2x 11.5xmedian 12.2x -13.4xmedian 11.7x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 3.4x 3.2xmedian 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.3x 6.6xmedian 5.3x 15.1xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.4xmedian 10.8x 14.7xmedian 10.8x -0.5xmedian 6.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median -0.33median 1.34 5.26median 1.34 0.26median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFCNCARFUWMC
Revenue – $7.62B $3.58B
Net income – $2.23B -$104.96M
Free cash flow – $1.67B -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) $198.60 $2.51 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents – – $498.41M
Total debt $24.47B $7.63B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 11.54M 857.00M 337.53M
Enterprise value $27.13B $24.36B -$1.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFCNCARFUWMC
P/E 12.0x 11.5x -13.4x
P/FCF 13.4x 14.7x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 13.8x -0.5x
P/S 2.2x 3.2x 0.7x
P/B 1.1x 1.3x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 1.4x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA – 6.6x 15.1x
EV/EBIT – 6.7x 17.0x
EV/Revenue – 4.2x 2.2x
EV/FCF – 19.3x -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.1x -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.33 5.26 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFCNCARFUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 4.4% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.7% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – 7.5% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.5% 15.6% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -36.3% 2.2% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -33.7% -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.7% -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -30.0% -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.9% -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFCNCARFUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 64.2% 14.6%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 37.4% -3.2%
Net margin – 28.2% -1.0%
FCF margin – 21.9% -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 23.3% -135.9%
Return on equity – 11.8% -8.1%
Return on assets – 1.4% -0.6%
Return on invested capital – 14.6% 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFCNCARFUWMC
Debt / assets – 4.7% 33.5%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.4x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.6x 10.6x
Debt / FCF – 4.6x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 91.1% 88.3% 94.5%
Equity / assets 8.9% 11.7% 5.5%
Interest coverage – 2.5x 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFCNCARFUWMC
Dividend yield 0.4% 3.8% 20.3%
Net buyback yield – 4.6% –
Shareholder yield 0.4% 8.5% 20.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 55.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFCNCARFUWMC
Forward P/E 12.1xFY2026 10.3xFY2026 7.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $197.00FY2026 $2.80FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +10.7%FY2026 +20.2%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.2% -4.3% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.53BFY2026 $7.33BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.5%FY2026 -3.3%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.4% +16.2% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFCNCARFUWMC
Held by institutions 63.7% 84.8% 17.0%
Institutions holding 628 1,106 291
Change in shares held, QoQ -5.2% +2.9% +31.8%
Institutions buying 260 560 214
Institutions selling 226 347 50
Buyers to sellers 1.15 1.61 4.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FCNCARFUWMC
FCNCA 1.00 0.65 0.21
RF 0.65 1.00 0.23
UWMC 0.21 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FCNCA, RF and UWMC?

First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA) is the largest by market capitalisation: First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA) $27.13B, Regions Financial (RF) $24.36B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $529.91M.

Which stock is cheaper, FCNCA, RF and UWMC?

Regions Financial (RF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA) 11.8x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.3x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -14.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA) 12.1x, Regions Financial (RF) 10.3x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 7.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest net margin (Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA) returned the most: First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA) +33.4%, Regions Financial (RF) +19.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.8%. Over five years, First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA) compounded fastest (First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA) +24.0%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +4.0%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA) 0.00%, Regions Financial (RF) 0.04%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%. First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA) and UWM Holdings (UWMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Regions Financial (RF) has been the steadiest (First Citizens Bancshares (FCNCA) 27.2%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FCNCA, RF and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Regions Financial (RF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.