FCFS vs HTT vs AFRM Stock Comparison

FirstCash Holdings, High Templar Tech and Affirm Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CACC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FCFS FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
$175.27 -19.4% 1M +13.7% 1Y
Market cap
$7.98B
P/E
19.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.29B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
6 wins
HTT High Templar Tech Ltd
$1.90 -20.8% 1M -57.2% 1Y
Market cap
$820.37M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.
$69.49 -2.8% 1M -7.8% 1Y
Market cap
$24.36B
P/E
12.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.26B
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

FirstCash Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (FirstCash Holdings 6, Affirm Holdings 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFCFSHTTAFRMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.98B $820.37M $24.36B AFRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.6x — 12.6x AFRM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.3x — 37.2x FCFS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.9% — +32.2% AFRM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.5% — 45.3% AFRM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.7% — 5.6% FCFS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.3x — 2.3x AFRM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.7% -57.2% -7.8% FCFS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.4%/yr +1.8%/yr -14.4%/yr FCFS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.1% 56.9% 59.7% FCFS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 — 54/100 FCFS

Percentile Scorecard

FCFSHTTAFRM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFCFSHTTAFRM
Valuation 49 #88 of 170 – 34 #113 of 170
Growth 74 #42 of 160 – 99 #3 of 160
Profitability 76 #36 of 149 – 65 #53 of 149
Financial Health 66 #55 of 158 93 #12 of 158 61 #63 of 158
Shareholder Returns 29 #96 of 135 – 13 #118 of 135
Overall 59 – 54
  • FCFS ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • HTT ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • AFRM ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFCFSHTTAFRMSPY
1 month -19.4%-20.8%-2.8% -0.8%
3 months -15.2%-21.5%-4.9% +3.5%
6 months -19.4%-21.8%+6.7% +7.0%
Year to date +10.0%-46.5%-6.6% +12.2%
1 year +13.7%-57.2%-7.8% +13.0%
3 years +63.7%+5.6%+310.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year +17.9%+1.8%+60.2% +23.1%
5 years +87.8%+9.2%-54.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +13.4%+1.8%-14.4% +11.0%
10 years +269.8%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year +14.0%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFCFSHTTAFRMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.1%56.9%59.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.6%59.8%58.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.681.152.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.38-1.01-0.13 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.7%-64.4%-94.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.9%-61.6%-19.0% -1.8%
52-week high $236.43$4.95$85.78 $779.14
52-week low $148.05$1.90$42.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFCFSHTTAFRM
P/E now vs peer median 18.6xmedian 11.0x —median 11.0x 12.1xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x 5.5xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x 33.6xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.5xmedian 6.9x —median 6.9x 23.6xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 0.7x 0.5xmedian 0.7x 4.3xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.81median 0.32 —median 0.32 0.22median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFCFSHTTAFRM
Revenue $4.29B – $4.26B
Gross profit $2.15B – –
Operating income $553.59M – $416.98M
Net income $406.49M – $1.93B
Free cash flow $518.18M – $992.63M
EPS (diluted) $9.38 – $5.53
Cash & equivalents $203.16M $561.74M $1.63B
Total debt $2.45B $879.65M $10.58B
Shares (diluted) 43.34M 500.73M 348.85M
Enterprise value $7.35B -$2.21B $18.05B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFCFSHTTAFRM
P/E 18.6x – 12.1x
P/FCF 14.5x – 23.6x
P/Operating cash flow 11.1x – 19.0x
P/S 1.8x – 5.5x
P/B 3.3x 0.5x 4.3x
P/Tangible book 3.6x 0.5x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA 14.2x – 33.6x
EV/EBIT 17.6x – 60.3x
EV/Revenue 2.3x – 5.9x
EV/FCF 18.8x – 25.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.4x – 20.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.81 – 0.22

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFCFSHTTAFRM
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.9% – 32.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.0% – 39.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.3% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.4% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.6% – 577.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.3% – 32.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 31.2% – 3,598%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.9% – 58.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 34.7% – 3,515%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.8% – 54.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 17.6% – 55.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.8% – 365.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.7% – 65.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.8% – 123.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFCFSHTTAFRM
Gross margin 50.2% – –
EBITDA margin 16.0% – 17.6%
Operating margin 12.9% – 9.8%
Pretax margin 12.9% – 11.6%
Net margin 9.5% – 45.3%
FCF margin 12.1% – 23.3%
Operating cash flow margin 15.8% – 28.9%
Return on equity 17.7% – 41.6%
Return on assets 7.4% – 13.3%
Return on invested capital 8.7% – 5.6%
Return on capital employed 10.9% – –
Asset turnover 0.8x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x – 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 7.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFCFSHTTAFRM
Debt / assets 44.0% 16.0% 21.1%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.2x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.3x – 2.3x
Debt / FCF 4.7x – 3.4x
Liabilities / assets 59.1% 21.2% 65.3%
Equity / assets 40.9% 78.8% 34.7%
Interest coverage 3.9x – 0.9x
Current ratio 4.8x 4.8x –
Quick ratio 0.5x 2.4x –
Cash ratio 0.5x 2.4x –
Altman Z-score 3.31 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFCFSHTTAFRM
Dividend yield 1.0% – –
Net buyback yield 3.7% – -0.7%
Shareholder yield 4.6% – -0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFCFSHTTAFRM
Forward P/E 15.3xFY2026 – 37.2xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $11.43FY2026 $-0.04FY2024 $1.87FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +30.5%FY2026 -233.3%FY2024 -66.2%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +8.7% – +44.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.25BFY2026 $47.00MFY2024 $5.23BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +16.2%FY2026 +164.2%FY2024 +22.7%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +2.9% – +24.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFCFSHTTAFRM
Held by institutions 97.2% 2.2% 77.1%
Institutions holding 500 42 658
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% -26.1% +8.1%
Institutions buying 253 14 401
Institutions selling 166 21 173
Buyers to sellers 1.52 0.67 2.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FCFSHTTAFRM
FCFS 1.00 0.09 0.08
HTT 0.09 1.00 0.26
AFRM 0.08 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FCFS, HTT and AFRM?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) $7.98B, High Templar Tech (HTT) $820.37M, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) $24.36B.

Which stock is cheaper, FCFS, HTT and AFRM?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 19.6x, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 12.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) is cheapest (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 15.3x, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 37.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +22.9%, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) +32.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Affirm Holdings (AFRM) has the highest net margin (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 9.5%, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 45.3%). On return on invested capital, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) leads (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 8.7%, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 5.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) returned the most: FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +13.7%, High Templar Tech (HTT) -57.2%, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -7.8%. Over five years, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) compounded fastest (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) +13.4%/yr, High Templar Tech (HTT) +1.8%/yr, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) -14.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) has been the steadiest (FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) 36.1%, High Templar Tech (HTT) 56.9%, Affirm Holdings (AFRM) 59.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FCFS, HTT and AFRM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, FirstCash Holdings (FCFS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.