FCCN vs QUBT vs UIS Stock Comparison

Spectral Capital, Quantum Computing and Unisys Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BIDU) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FCCN SPECTRAL CAPITAL Corp
$1.58 -34.2% 1M -26.5% 1Y
Market cap
$150.96M
P/E
3,212x
Revenue (TTM)
$668.63M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
3 wins
QUBT Quantum Computing Inc.
$6.43 -19.0% 1M -53.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.27B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$9.82M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
3 wins
UIS Unisys Corp
$2.35 +1.7% 1M -30.3% 1Y
Market cap
$173.90M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.95B
Div. yield
–
IT Services Technology
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Quantum Computing leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Quantum Computing 3, Spectral Capital 3, Unisys 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFCCNQUBTUISLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $150.96M $1.27B $173.90M QUBT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3,212x -85.1x -0.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 3.7x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +3,635.4% -0.6% QUBT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.0% -152.5% -21.7% FCCN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 6.4% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 4.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -26.5% -53.1% -30.3% FCCN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +1.7%/yr -35.7%/yr QUBT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 116.2% 87.1% 64.8% UIS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 34/100 37/100 FCCN

Percentile Scorecard

FCCNQUBTUIS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFCCNQUBTUIS
Valuation 59 #52 of 124 27 #91 of 124 96 #3 of 52
Growth 43 #65 of 114 29 #81 of 114 16 #39 of 46
Profitability 60 #45 of 111 19 #90 of 111 27 #31 of 42
Financial Health 15 #109 of 128 94 #9 of 128 10 #55 of 61
Shareholder Returns 28 #53 of 73 0 #73 of 73 –
Overall 41 34 37
  • FCCN ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • QUBT ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • UIS ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFCCNQUBTUISSPY
1 month -34.2%-19.0%+1.7% -1.0%
3 months -69.0%-27.6%-19.5% -0.4%
6 months -19.0%-38.5%-28.1% +4.5%
Year to date -61.7%-37.3%-14.9% +12.4%
1 year -26.5%-53.1%-30.3% +13.6%
3 years —+674.7%-19.0% +76.4%
3 years, per year —+98.0%-6.8% +20.8%
5 years —+8.8%-89.0% +63.7%
5 years, per year —+1.7%-35.7% +10.4%
10 years —+3,115.0%-77.3% +267.7%
10 years, per year —+41.5%-13.8% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureFCCNQUBTUISSPY
Volatility, 1Y 116.2%87.1%64.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 111.6%83.6%59.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.093.561.84 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.23-0.61-0.47 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.4%-94.4%-91.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -71.5%-54.7%-50.8% -1.6%
52-week high $5.55$14.19$4.78 $779.14
52-week low $1.35$6.31$2.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFCCNQUBTUIS
P/E now vs peer median 3,095xmedian 41.0x -96.5xmedian 41.0x -0.4xmedian 18.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 4.4x 148.1xmedian 4.4x 0.1xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 276.3xmedian 28.9x -7.3xmedian 28.9x 6.0xmedian 9.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -59.1xmedian 23.9x -28.3xmedian 23.9x 2.2xmedian 13.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 3.1x 0.9xmedian 3.1x -0.5xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 102.39median 1.36 -2.40median 1.36 0.02median 1.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFCCNQUBTUIS
Revenue $668.63M $9.82M $1.95B
Gross profit $8.35M -$1.86M $541.60M
Operating income -$6.62M -$76.18M $26.40M
Net income -$21.19K -$14.98M -$421.80M
Free cash flow -$2.57M -$51.48M $76.30M
R&D – $26.91M $23.50M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $-0.07 $-5.78
Cash & equivalents $5.27M $189.15M $324.30M
Total debt – – $733.50M
Shares (diluted) 94.89M 224.73M 72.91M
Enterprise value $140.48M -$2.34B -$1.27B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFCCNQUBTUIS
P/E 3,095x -96.5x -0.4x
P/FCF -59.1x -28.3x 2.2x
P/Operating cash flow -59.4x -33.8x 1.5x
P/S 0.2x 148.1x 0.1x
P/B 2.6x 0.9x -0.5x
P/Tangible book 7.8x 0.9x -0.4x
EV/EBITDA 276.3x -7.3x 6.0x
EV/EBIT -22.2x -6.6x 22.0x
EV/Revenue 0.2x 51.0x 0.3x
EV/FCF -57.1x -9.7x 7.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -57.3x -11.6x 5.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 102.39 -2.40 0.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFCCNQUBTUIS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 3,635% -0.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1,948% 230.4% -1.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -2,367% -2.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 276.8% -158.9% -1.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -83.7% -132.2% -71.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -304.6% -36.2% -34.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 99.4% 80.4% -412.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 40.4% 18.1% -19.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 100.9% 87.7% -405.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.2% 40.2% -16.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -28.6% -128.0% 164.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -186.1% -41.0% -5.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -29.2% -105.7% 136.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -186.6% -45.3% -10.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFCCNQUBTUIS
Gross margin 1.2% -18.9% 27.8%
EBITDA margin 0.1% -697.4% 5.0%
Operating margin -1.0% -775.5% 1.4%
Pretax margin 0.0% -152.5% -18.2%
Net margin 0.0% -152.5% -21.7%
FCF margin -0.4% -524.0% 3.9%
Operating cash flow margin -0.4% -438.3% 5.8%
Return on equity 0.1% -0.9% –
Return on assets 0.0% -0.9% -25.0%
Return on invested capital – – 6.4%
Return on capital employed -4.7% -4.7% 2.4%
Asset turnover 2.2x 0.0x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 120.9x 2.9x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 86.5% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFCCNQUBTUIS
Debt / assets – – 44.7%
Debt / equity – – -2.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 4.2x
Debt / FCF – – 9.6x
Liabilities / assets 74.3% 2.9% 122.4%
Equity / assets 25.7% 97.1% -22.4%
Interest coverage – -577.1x 0.4x
Current ratio 0.8x 53.1x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 51.7x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.0x 51.3x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 3.08 18.88 -0.76

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFCCNQUBTUIS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -1.3% -82.4% –
Shareholder yield -1.3% -82.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFCCNQUBTUIS
Forward P/E – – 3.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.15FY2026 $0.63FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -32.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +71.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $29.28MFY2026 $2.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +4,193.8%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +84.3% -2.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFCCNQUBTUIS
Held by institutions – 45.4% 79.2%
Institutions holding – 316 152
Change in shares held, QoQ – +10.7% -0.4%
Institutions buying – 196 83
Institutions selling – 62 37
Buyers to sellers – 3.16 2.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FCCNQUBTUIS
FCCN 1.00 0.05 0.04
QUBT 0.05 1.00 0.30
UIS 0.04 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FCCN, QUBT and UIS?

Quantum Computing (QUBT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Spectral Capital (FCCN) $150.96M, Quantum Computing (QUBT) $1.27B, Unisys (UIS) $173.90M.

Which company is growing faster?

Quantum Computing (QUBT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Quantum Computing (QUBT) +3,635.4%, Unisys (UIS) -0.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Spectral Capital (FCCN) has the highest net margin (Spectral Capital (FCCN) 0.0%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) -152.5%, Unisys (UIS) -21.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Spectral Capital (FCCN) returned the most: Spectral Capital (FCCN) -26.5%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) -53.1%, Unisys (UIS) -30.3%. Over five years, Quantum Computing (QUBT) compounded fastest (Quantum Computing (QUBT) +1.7%/yr, Unisys (UIS) -35.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Unisys (UIS) has been the steadiest (Spectral Capital (FCCN) 116.2%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) 87.1%, Unisys (UIS) 64.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FCCN, QUBT and UIS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Quantum Computing (QUBT) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.