FCCN vs IONQ vs QUBT Stock Comparison

Spectral Capital, IonQ and Quantum Computing Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BIDU) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FCCN SPECTRAL CAPITAL Corp
$1.64 -34.4% 1M -23.7% 1Y
Market cap
$157.92M
P/E
3,212x
Revenue (TTM)
$668.63M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
2 wins
IONQ IonQ, Inc.
$26.48 -38.9% 1M -52.2% 1Y
Market cap
$11.45B
P/E
52.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$380.44M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
4 wins
QUBT Quantum Computing Inc.
$5.63 -28.4% 1M -60.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.27B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$9.82M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

IonQ leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (IonQ 4, Quantum Computing 2, Spectral Capital 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFCCNIONQQUBTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $157.92M $11.45B $1.27B IONQ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 3,212x 52.7x -84.5x IONQ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +376.5% +3,635.4% QUBT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.0% 51.3% -152.5% IONQ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.9x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -23.7% -52.2% -60.3% FCCN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +6.6%/yr -1.0%/yr IONQ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 116.3% 90.5% 88.0% QUBT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 39/100 33/100 FCCN

Percentile Scorecard

FCCNIONQQUBT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFCCNIONQQUBT
Valuation 56 #55 of 124 29 #88 of 124 24 #94 of 124
Growth 42 #67 of 114 51 #56 of 114 28 #82 of 114
Profitability 60 #45 of 111 31 #77 of 111 18 #91 of 111
Financial Health 16 #108 of 128 79 #28 of 128 93 #10 of 128
Shareholder Returns 26 #55 of 74 7 #69 of 74 0 #74 of 74
Overall 40 39 33
  • FCCN ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • IONQ ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • QUBT ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFCCNIONQQUBTSPY
1 month -34.4%-38.9%-28.4% -5.9%
3 months -67.7%-33.3%-35.8% -4.6%
6 months -17.6%-44.5%-41.5% +0.2%
Year to date -60.3%-41.0%-45.1% +7.5%
1 year -23.7%-52.2%-60.3% +8.2%
3 years —+136.2%+595.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year —+33.2%+90.9% +19.0%
5 years —+37.4%-4.7% +56.5%
5 years, per year —+6.6%-1.0% +9.4%
10 years ——+2,715.0% +251.5%
10 years, per year ——+39.6% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureFCCNIONQQUBTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 116.3%90.5%88.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 111.6%83.8%85.3% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.013.363.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.20-0.58-0.69 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.4%-90.0%-94.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -70.5%-63.3%-60.3% -5.9%
52-week high $5.55$72.07$14.19 $779.14
52-week low $1.35$26.48$5.63 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFCCNIONQQUBT
P/E now vs peer median 3,212xmedian 39.4x 52.7xmedian 39.4x -84.5xmedian 39.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 4.0x 30.1xmedian 4.0x 129.7xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 287.2xmedian 34.1x -10.4xmedian 34.1x -4.7xmedian 34.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -61.3xmedian 22.7x -16.6xmedian 22.7x -24.8xmedian 22.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 2.9x 2.3xmedian 2.9x 0.8xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 106.28median 1.32 1.32median 1.32 -2.10median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFCCNIONQQUBT
Revenue $668.63M $380.44M $9.82M
Gross profit $8.35M $91.68M -$1.86M
Operating income -$6.62M -$1.27B -$76.18M
Net income -$21.19K $252.40M -$14.98M
Free cash flow -$2.57M -$688.54M -$51.48M
R&D – $524.13M $26.91M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $0.49 $-0.07
Cash & equivalents $5.27M $209.45M $189.15M
Total debt – $65.61M –
Shares (diluted) 94.89M 400.87M 224.73M
Enterprise value $147.21M $3.94B -$2.34B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFCCNIONQQUBT
P/E 3,212x 52.7x -84.5x
P/FCF -61.3x -16.6x -24.8x
P/Operating cash flow -61.6x -17.8x -29.6x
P/S 0.2x 30.1x 129.7x
P/B 2.7x 2.3x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 8.1x 3.0x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA 287.2x -10.4x -4.7x
EV/EBIT -23.1x -8.3x -4.2x
EV/Revenue 0.2x 27.7x 32.6x
EV/FCF -59.3x -15.3x -6.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -59.6x -16.3x -7.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 106.28 1.32 -2.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFCCNIONQQUBT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 376.5% 3,635%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1,948% 168.1% 230.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 124.2% -2,367%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 276.8% 87.5% -158.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -83.7% -163.3% -132.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -304.6% -115.5% -36.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 99.4% 117.2% 80.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 40.4% 57.1% 18.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 100.9% 109.8% 87.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.2% 39.9% 40.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -28.6% -159.9% -128.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -186.1% -112.6% -41.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -29.2% -165.5% -105.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -186.6% -109.8% -45.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFCCNIONQQUBT
Gross margin 1.2% 24.1% -18.9%
EBITDA margin 0.1% -266.3% -697.4%
Operating margin -1.0% -333.9% -775.5%
Pretax margin 0.0% 19.3% -152.5%
Net margin 0.0% 51.3% -152.5%
FCF margin -0.4% -181.0% -524.0%
Operating cash flow margin -0.4% -169.5% -438.3%
Return on equity 0.1% 6.0% -0.9%
Return on assets 0.0% 3.5% -0.9%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -4.7% -18.3% -4.7%
Asset turnover 2.2x 0.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 120.9x -2.6x 2.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 140.0% 86.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFCCNIONQQUBT
Debt / assets – 0.8% –
Debt / equity – 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.9x –
Debt / FCF – -0.1x –
Liabilities / assets 74.3% 36.0% 2.9%
Equity / assets 25.7% 64.0% 97.1%
Interest coverage – – -577.1x
Current ratio 0.8x 4.2x 53.1x
Quick ratio 0.8x 3.2x 51.7x
Cash ratio 0.0x 2.7x 51.3x
Altman Z-score 3.10 1.82 16.57

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFCCNIONQQUBT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -1.2% -17.5% -94.1%
Shareholder yield -1.2% -17.5% -94.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFCCNIONQQUBT
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.36FY2026 $-0.15FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $458.49MFY2026 $29.28MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +252.6%FY2026 +4,193.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +71.5% +84.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFCCNIONQQUBT
Held by institutions – 53.3% 45.4%
Institutions holding – 783 316
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.4% +10.7%
Institutions buying – 538 196
Institutions selling – 154 62
Buyers to sellers – 3.49 3.16

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FCCNIONQQUBT
FCCN 1.00 0.04 0.04
IONQ 0.04 1.00 0.85
QUBT 0.04 0.85 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FCCN, IONQ and QUBT?

IonQ (IONQ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Spectral Capital (FCCN) $157.92M, IonQ (IONQ) $11.45B, Quantum Computing (QUBT) $1.27B.

Which stock is cheaper, FCCN, IONQ and QUBT?

IonQ (IONQ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Spectral Capital (FCCN) 3,212x, IonQ (IONQ) 52.7x, Quantum Computing (QUBT) -84.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Quantum Computing (QUBT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: IonQ (IONQ) +376.5%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) +3,635.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

IonQ (IONQ) has the highest net margin (Spectral Capital (FCCN) 0.0%, IonQ (IONQ) 51.3%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) -152.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Spectral Capital (FCCN) returned the most: Spectral Capital (FCCN) -23.7%, IonQ (IONQ) -52.2%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) -60.3%. Over five years, IonQ (IONQ) compounded fastest (IonQ (IONQ) +6.6%/yr, Quantum Computing (QUBT) -1.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Quantum Computing (QUBT) has been the steadiest (Spectral Capital (FCCN) 116.3%, IonQ (IONQ) 90.5%, Quantum Computing (QUBT) 88.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FCCN, IONQ and QUBT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, IonQ (IONQ) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.