ETOR vs MATH vs IBKR Stock Comparison

eToro, Metalpha Technology Holding and Interactive Brokers Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TOP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ETOR eToro Group Ltd.
$23.52 -10.9% 1M -40.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.97B
P/E
7.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.02B
Div. yield
–
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Interactive Brokers leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Interactive Brokers 5, eToro 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionETORMATHIBKRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.97B $40.98M $36.86B IBKR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.6x 33.4x 31.3x ETOR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.7x — 31.2x ETOR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -9.3% — +19.7% IBKR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.2% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -40.1% -67.9% +17.2% IBKR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -7.8%/yr +35.1%/yr IBKR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.0% 84.5% 39.5% IBKR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 — 40/100 ETOR

Percentile Scorecard

ETORMATHIBKR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisETORMATHIBKR
Valuation 95 #6 of 97 63 #37 of 97 60 #39 of 97
Growth 30 #48 of 68 – 51 #34 of 68
Profitability 42 #39 of 67 – 32 #46 of 67
Financial Health 88 #13 of 97 28 #70 of 97 –
Shareholder Returns 5 #38 of 40 – 18 #33 of 40
Overall 52 – 40
  • ETOR ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • MATH ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • IBKR ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodETORMATHIBKRSPY
1 month -10.9%+3.1%-9.7% -0.8%
3 months -37.8%+22.0%-12.7% +3.5%
6 months -35.4%-1.0%+3.9% +7.0%
Year to date -33.0%-52.4%+25.3% +12.2%
1 year -40.1%-67.9%+17.2% +13.0%
3 years —-36.3%+306.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-14.0%+59.7% +23.1%
5 years —-33.3%+349.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-7.8%+35.1% +11.0%
10 years ——+864.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+25.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureETORMATHIBKRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.0%84.5%39.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 45.6%82.6%37.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.820.732.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.79-0.800.44 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.0%-81.8%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.5%-68.5%-17.9% -1.8%
52-week high $43.93$3.17$98.19 $779.14
52-week low $23.52$0.75$61.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleETORMATHIBKR
P/E now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 29.4x 33.4xmedian 29.4x 30.7xmedian 29.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.9x 1.3xmedian 2.9x 5.1xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -11.7xmedian 13.7x —median 13.7x —median 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.2xmedian 16.0x -3.2xmedian 16.0x 2.5xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.3x 0.9xmedian 2.3x 1.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.52 —median 0.52 1.24median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsETORMATHIBKR
Revenue $12.02B – $7.12B
Gross profit $309.93M – –
Operating income -$77.44M – –
Net income $261.44M – –
Free cash flow $317.92M – –
R&D $150.69M – –
EPS (diluted) $2.74 – $2.62
Cash & equivalents $945.92M $3.94M $5.94B
Total debt – $132.64M –
Shares (diluted) 95.13M 64.62M 450.09M
Enterprise value -$2.99B $16.17M $36.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricETORMATHIBKR
P/E 7.5x 33.4x 30.7x
P/FCF 6.2x -3.2x 2.5x
P/Operating cash flow 6.3x – –
P/S 0.2x 1.3x 5.1x
P/B – 0.9x 1.6x
P/Tangible book – -0.6x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA -11.7x – –
EV/EBIT -9.7x – –
EV/Revenue 0.1x – 5.1x
EV/FCF 2.4x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 2.4x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 1.24

Growth

14 metrics
MetricETORMATHIBKR
Revenue growth (1Y) -9.3% – 19.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 19.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.1% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 48.6% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 39.2% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) -99.7% – 27.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 24.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.8% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.6% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricETORMATHIBKR
Gross margin 2.6% – –
EBITDA margin -0.5% – –
Operating margin -0.6% – –
Pretax margin 2.6% – –
Net margin 2.2% – –
FCF margin 2.6% – –
Operating cash flow margin 2.6% – –
Return on equity – – 22.2%
Return on assets 14.2% – 2.1%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -4.2% – –
Asset turnover 6.5x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricETORMATHIBKR
Debt / assets – 8.0% –
Debt / equity – 0.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets – 89.1% 90.4%
Equity / assets – 10.9% 9.6%
Interest coverage -1.9x – –
Current ratio – 1.1x –
Quick ratio 125.8x 0.0x –
Cash ratio 125.1x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricETORMATHIBKR
Dividend yield – – 0.4%
Net buyback yield -13.3% – –
Shareholder yield -13.3% 0.0% 0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusETORMATHIBKR
Forward P/E 9.7xFY2026 – 31.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.42FY2026 – $2.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.6%FY2026 – +17.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +11.2% – +32.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $948.94MFY2026 – $7.62BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.3%FY2026 – +22.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.1% – +23.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersETORMATHIBKR
Held by institutions 39.1% 0.9% 86.0%
Institutions holding 149 14 1,108
Change in shares held, QoQ +19.9% -55.7% +2.3%
Institutions buying 93 7 591
Institutions selling 43 5 376
Buyers to sellers 2.16 1.40 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ETORMATHIBKR
ETOR 1.00 0.02 0.42
MATH 0.02 1.00 0.11
IBKR 0.42 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ETOR, MATH and IBKR?

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) is the largest by market capitalisation: eToro (ETOR) $1.97B, Metalpha Technology Holding (MATH) $40.98M, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) $36.86B.

Which stock is cheaper, ETOR, MATH and IBKR?

eToro (ETOR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (eToro (ETOR) 7.6x, Metalpha Technology Holding (MATH) 33.4x, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) 31.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, eToro (ETOR) is cheapest (eToro (ETOR) 9.7x, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) 31.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Interactive Brokers (IBKR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: eToro (ETOR) -9.3%, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) +19.7%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Interactive Brokers (IBKR) returned the most: eToro (ETOR) -40.1%, Metalpha Technology Holding (MATH) -67.9%, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) +17.2%. Over five years, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) compounded fastest (Metalpha Technology Holding (MATH) -7.8%/yr, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) +35.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) has been the steadiest (eToro (ETOR) 51.0%, Metalpha Technology Holding (MATH) 84.5%, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) 39.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ETOR, MATH and IBKR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.