ESLT vs NOC vs TAYD Stock Comparison

Elbit Systems, Northrop Grumman and Taylor Devices Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LHX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd
$756.62 +8.7% 1M +57.3% 1Y
Market cap
$32.19B
P/E
50.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.55B
Div. yield
0.00%
Defense Industrials
4 wins
TAYD Taylor Devices, Inc.
$57.17 +4.0% 1M +26.4% 1Y
Market cap
$190.56M
P/E
27.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$39.03M
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Northrop Grumman leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Northrop Grumman 4, Elbit Systems 4, Taylor Devices 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionESLTNOCTAYDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $32.19B $74.86B $190.56M NOC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 50.6x 16.6x 27.9x NOC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 54.3x 17.9x 19.3x NOC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.7% +6.5% -12.5% ESLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.4% 10.4% 17.5% TAYD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.8% 12.2% — ESLT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.9x 1.7x — ESLT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +57.3% -4.3% +26.4% ESLT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +37.2%/yr +9.1%/yr +37.6%/yr TAYD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.2% 28.7% 56.4% NOC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 58/100 62/100 TAYD

Percentile Scorecard

ESLTNOCTAYD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisESLTNOCTAYD
Valuation 48 #53 of 101 75 #26 of 101 77 #24 of 101
Growth 87 #14 of 98 38 #61 of 98 17 #82 of 98
Profitability 73 #27 of 97 77 #23 of 97 92 #9 of 97
Financial Health 59 #45 of 107 39 #66 of 107 95 #6 of 107
Shareholder Returns 38 #41 of 65 61 #26 of 65 31 #45 of 65
Overall 61 58 62
  • ESLT ranked among 108 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • NOC ranked among 108 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • TAYD ranked among 108 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodESLTNOCTAYDSPY
1 month +8.7%+15.2%+4.0% -2.0%
3 months -10.9%-0.2%+6.5% -2.2%
6 months -11.1%-1.5%+3.4% +4.2%
Year to date +31.0%-3.5%-2.2% +10.6%
1 year +57.3%-4.3%+26.4% +10.4%
3 years +297.3%+17.0%+161.3% +73.6%
3 years, per year +58.4%+5.4%+37.8% +20.2%
5 years +385.5%+54.3%+392.4% +61.6%
5 years, per year +37.2%+9.1%+37.6% +10.1%
10 years +693.4%+144.1%+300.9% +261.3%
10 years, per year +23.0%+9.3%+14.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureESLTNOCTAYDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.2%28.7%56.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.4%28.4%63.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.74-0.010.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.27-0.150.47 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.5%-38.4%-52.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.4%-28.3%-36.4% -3.2%
52-week high $1,014.33$768.02$89.95 $779.14
52-week low $454.95$473.40$43.14 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleESLTNOCTAYD
P/E now vs peer median 54.4xmedian 26.8x 17.3xmedian 26.8x 27.0xmedian 26.8x
P/S now vs peer median 4.1xmedian 2.9x 1.8xmedian 2.9x 4.7xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 35.4xmedian 14.7x 14.5xmedian 14.7x 19.0xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 35.4xmedian 29.2x 20.4xmedian 29.2x 15.2xmedian 29.2x
P/B now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 2.6x 4.2xmedian 2.6x 2.5xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median 1.73median 0.93 16.99median 0.93 13.43median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsESLTNOCTAYD
Revenue $8.55B $43.59B $39.03M
Gross profit $2.14B $8.73B $16.07M
Operating income $787.82M $4.63B $5.14M
Net income $636.61M $4.52B $6.83M
Free cash flow $992.19M $3.83B $12.13M
R&D $582.72M – $847.25K
EPS (diluted) $13.56 $31.74 $2.16
Cash & equivalents $255.34M $3.74B $3.60M
Total debt $92.13M $14.43B –
Shares (diluted) 46.92M 142.40M 3.16M
Enterprise value $28.75B $62.32B $17.55M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricESLTNOCTAYD
P/E 54.4x 17.3x 27.0x
P/FCF 35.4x 20.4x 15.2x
P/Operating cash flow 35.4x 14.8x 12.9x
P/S 4.1x 1.8x 4.7x
P/B 8.0x 4.2x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 8.0x 4.2x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA 35.4x 14.5x 19.0x
EV/EBIT 43.5x 19.2x 26.4x
EV/Revenue 4.0x 2.0x 3.5x
EV/FCF 34.5x 23.2x 11.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 34.5x 16.9x 9.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.73 16.99 13.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricESLTNOCTAYD
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.7% 6.5% -12.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 4.1% -1.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.5% 9.8% -21.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.1% 3.4% -3.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 37.1% 6.8% -42.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.5% 6.4% -12.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 58.0% 12.5% -23.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 33.7% -1.1% -1.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 50.8% 13.3% -23.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.5% 1.0% 2.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 22.1% 53.2% 24.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 82.7% 12.5% 10.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 105.8% 108.8% 34.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 175.7% 22.3% 15.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricESLTNOCTAYD
Gross margin 25.0% 20.0% 41.2%
EBITDA margin 11.3% 14.1% 18.3%
Operating margin 9.2% 10.6% 13.2%
Pretax margin 8.1% 12.0% 17.5%
Net margin 7.4% 10.4% 17.5%
FCF margin 11.6% 8.8% 31.1%
Operating cash flow margin 11.6% 12.1% 36.7%
Return on equity 14.7% 24.7% 9.3%
Return on assets 4.7% 8.8% 8.6%
Return on invested capital 17.8% 12.2% –
Return on capital employed 11.0% 12.2% 7.2%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.8x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.2x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricESLTNOCTAYD
Debt / assets 0.7% 27.5% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.9x 1.7x –
Debt / FCF 0.1x 3.8x –
Liabilities / assets 68.2% 64.4% 9.4%
Equity / assets 31.8% 35.6% 90.6%
Interest coverage – 7.1x –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.2x 8.7x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.0x 7.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 6.4x
Altman Z-score – 3.08 17.28

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricESLTNOCTAYD
Dividend yield 0.5% 1.7% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% 0.7% -1.0%
Shareholder yield 0.5% 2.4% -1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 22.7% 30.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 14.5% 35.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -54.3% 8.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -17.4% 7.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusESLTNOCTAYD
Forward P/E 54.3xFY2026 17.9xFY2026 19.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.93FY2026 $30.81FY2026 $2.96FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +22.3%FY2026 +17.0%FY2026 +9.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.8% +3.7% +32.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.84BFY2026 $42.95BFY2026 $55.10MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.3%FY2026 +2.4%FY2026 +32.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +21.1% +3.7% +13.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersESLTNOCTAYD
Held by institutions 19.9% 83.4% 35.0%
Institutions holding 386 1,813 69
Change in shares held, QoQ -7.1% +0.3% +8.4%
Institutions buying 202 841 45
Institutions selling 108 642 14
Buyers to sellers 1.87 1.31 3.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ESLTNOCTAYD
ESLT 1.00 0.40 -0.02
NOC 0.40 1.00 0.01
TAYD -0.02 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ESLT, NOC and TAYD?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Elbit Systems (ESLT) $32.19B, Northrop Grumman (NOC) $74.86B, Taylor Devices (TAYD) $190.56M.

Which stock is cheaper, ESLT, NOC and TAYD?

Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Elbit Systems (ESLT) 50.6x, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 16.6x, Taylor Devices (TAYD) 27.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Northrop Grumman (NOC) is cheapest (Elbit Systems (ESLT) 54.3x, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 17.9x, Taylor Devices (TAYD) 19.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Elbit Systems (ESLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Elbit Systems (ESLT) +13.7%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) +6.5%, Taylor Devices (TAYD) -12.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Taylor Devices (TAYD) has the highest net margin (Elbit Systems (ESLT) 7.4%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 10.4%, Taylor Devices (TAYD) 17.5%). On return on invested capital, Elbit Systems (ESLT) leads (Elbit Systems (ESLT) 17.8%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 12.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Elbit Systems (ESLT) returned the most: Elbit Systems (ESLT) +57.3%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) -4.3%, Taylor Devices (TAYD) +26.4%. Over five years, Taylor Devices (TAYD) compounded fastest (Elbit Systems (ESLT) +37.2%/yr, Northrop Grumman (NOC) +9.1%/yr, Taylor Devices (TAYD) +37.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Elbit Systems (ESLT) 0.00%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 0.02%, Taylor Devices (TAYD) 0.00%. Elbit Systems (ESLT) and Taylor Devices (TAYD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Northrop Grumman (NOC) has been the steadiest (Elbit Systems (ESLT) 45.2%, Northrop Grumman (NOC) 28.7%, Taylor Devices (TAYD) 56.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ESLT, NOC and TAYD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Northrop Grumman (NOC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.