ESAB vs LECO vs SWK Stock Comparison

Esab, Lincoln Electric Holdings and Stanley Black & Decker Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (IEX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ESAB ESAB Corp
$79.08 +10.1% 1M -29.7% 1Y
Market cap
$5.17B
P/E
33.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.10B
Div. yield
–
Power Tools Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Lincoln Electric Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Lincoln Electric Holdings 6, Stanley Black & Decker 5, Esab 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionESABLECOSWKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.17B $14.99B $16.98B SWK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.9x 26.1x 20.2x SWK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.4x 22.8x 19.9x ESAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.0% +11.1% +0.4% LECO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.9% 12.4% 5.5% LECO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.5% 22.6% 8.5% LECO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.6x 1.0x 1.9x LECO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.03% SWK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -29.7% +19.2% +65.7% SWK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +13.7%/yr -8.9%/yr LECO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.3% 31.0% 38.4% LECO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 31/100 54/100 65/100 SWK

Percentile Scorecard

ESABLECOSWK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisESABLECOSWK
Valuation 48 #107 of 204 31 #141 of 204 90 #22 of 204
Growth 24 #145 of 191 44 #107 of 191 92 #17 of 191
Profitability 43 #108 of 189 93 #14 of 189 62 #72 of 189
Financial Health 21 #174 of 221 46 #120 of 221 34 #146 of 221
Shareholder Returns 20 #127 of 159 54 #74 of 159 49 #82 of 159
Overall 31 54 65
  • ESAB ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • LECO ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • SWK ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodESABLECOSWKSPY
1 month +10.1%-1.2%+28.1% -5.9%
3 months -16.3%-2.4%+14.2% -4.6%
6 months -22.8%+0.4%+43.8% +0.2%
Year to date -29.2%+13.6%+55.3% +7.5%
1 year -29.7%+19.2%+65.7% +8.2%
3 years +5.4%+48.8%+33.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year +1.8%+14.2%+10.0% +19.0%
5 years —+89.9%-37.3% +56.5%
5 years, per year —+13.7%-8.9% +9.4%
10 years —+321.1%+0.7% +251.5%
10 years, per year —+15.5%+0.1% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureESABLECOSWKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.3%31.0%38.4% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.4%31.2%32.4% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.601.081.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.630.621.71 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.3%-35.3%-71.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.3%-9.0%-2.5% -5.9%
52-week high $134.82$298.88$118.24 $779.14
52-week low $64.45$220.64$62.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleESABLECOSWK
P/E now vs peer median 32.3xmedian 23.4x 25.7xmedian 23.4x 20.2xmedian 23.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.7x 3.2xmedian 1.7x 1.1xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.1xmedian 13.4x 17.2xmedian 13.4x 10.1xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.2xmedian 21.9x 28.8xmedian 21.9x 10.0xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.1x 9.5xmedian 2.1x 1.9xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -2.75median 1.02 3.69median 1.02 0.18median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsESABLECOSWK
Revenue $3.10B $4.64B $15.22B
Gross profit $1.16B $1.65B $5.14B
Operating income $347.75M $802.52M $1.60B
Net income $162.28M $575.27M $841.20M
Free cash flow $180.74M $511.89M $1.72B
EPS (diluted) $2.44 $10.48 $5.66
Cash & equivalents $188.65M $283.24M $741.20M
Total debt $2.33B $1.15B $4.70B
Shares (diluted) 62.39M 54.87M 148.63M
Enterprise value $3.57B $13.85B $15.04B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricESABLECOSWK
P/E 32.3x 25.7x 20.2x
P/FCF 27.2x 28.8x 10.0x
P/Operating cash flow 19.7x 22.1x 8.6x
P/S 1.6x 3.2x 1.1x
P/B 1.9x 9.5x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 3.9x 9.5x 2.9x
EV/EBITDA 15.1x 17.2x 10.1x
EV/EBIT 20.3x 19.4x 13.2x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 3.4x 1.4x
EV/FCF 39.0x 30.5x 12.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 28.2x 23.4x 10.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.75 3.69 0.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricESABLECOSWK
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.0% 11.1% 0.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.1% 4.5% -1.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.0% 7.7% 13.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.7% 5.5% 12.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -20.4% 12.9% 96.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -2.8% 7.0% 166.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -34.9% 9.6% 91.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -9.9% 4.9% 164.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -38.4% 11.0% 96.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -11.7% 7.0% 112.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.9% 0.7% 186.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.8% 0.5% 22.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -24.1% -6.3% 365.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.5% -3.6% 32.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricESABLECOSWK
Gross margin 37.6% 35.5% 33.8%
EBITDA margin 15.0% 19.5% 13.7%
Operating margin 11.2% 17.3% 10.5%
Pretax margin 7.5% 16.2% 7.7%
Net margin 4.9% 12.4% 5.5%
FCF margin 5.8% 11.0% 11.3%
Operating cash flow margin 8.1% 14.4% 13.1%
Return on equity 6.3% 37.0% 9.5%
Return on assets 2.5% 14.9% 4.2%
Return on invested capital 5.5% 22.6% 8.5%
Return on capital employed 6.0% 27.7% 10.3%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.2x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.2x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.5% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricESABLECOSWK
Debt / assets 35.9% 29.5% 23.5%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.7x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.6x 1.0x 1.9x
Debt / FCF 12.9x 2.2x 2.7x
Liabilities / assets 59.9% 60.1% 55.9%
Equity / assets 40.1% 39.9% 44.1%
Interest coverage 3.0x – 3.7x
Current ratio 1.9x 1.9x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.0x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.74 7.59 2.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricESABLECOSWK
Dividend yield 0.6% 1.2% 2.9%
Net buyback yield – 1.8% 2.9%
Shareholder yield 0.6% 3.0% 5.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 30.0% 59.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 33.7% 29.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.5% 0.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.3% 1.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusESABLECOSWK
Forward P/E 15.4xFY2026 22.8xFY2026 19.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.13FY2026 $11.94FY2026 $5.80FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -2.8%FY2026 +21.0%FY2026 +24.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.7% +0.2% +5.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.86BFY2026 $4.93BFY2026 $16.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +16.5%FY2026 +6.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.3% +5.2% +0.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersESABLECOSWK
Held by institutions 100.0% 81.3% 95.7%
Institutions holding 349 705 773
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.0% +5.5% +5.3%
Institutions buying 187 299 417
Institutions selling 111 266 245
Buyers to sellers 1.68 1.12 1.70

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ESABLECOSWK
ESAB 1.00 0.68 0.63
LECO 0.68 1.00 0.52
SWK 0.63 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ESAB, LECO and SWK?

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Esab (ESAB) $5.17B, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) $14.99B, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) $16.98B.

Which stock is cheaper, ESAB, LECO and SWK?

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Esab (ESAB) 33.9x, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 26.1x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 20.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Esab (ESAB) is cheapest (Esab (ESAB) 15.4x, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 22.8x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 19.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Esab (ESAB) +11.0%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +11.1%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +0.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) has the highest net margin (Esab (ESAB) 4.9%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 12.4%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 5.5%). On return on invested capital, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) leads (Esab (ESAB) 5.5%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 22.6%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 8.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) returned the most: Esab (ESAB) -29.7%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +19.2%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +65.7%. Over five years, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) compounded fastest (Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) +13.7%/yr, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) -8.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) has the highest dividend yield: Esab (ESAB) 0.00%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 0.01%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 0.03%. Esab (ESAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) has been the steadiest (Esab (ESAB) 47.3%, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) 31.0%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 38.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ESAB, LECO and SWK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.