ESAB vs IR vs SWK Stock Comparison

Esab, Ingersoll Rand and Stanley Black & Decker Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LECO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ESAB ESAB Corp
$78.28 +9.5% 1M -29.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.91B
P/E
28.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.00B
Div. yield
–
Power Tools Industrials
2 wins
IR Ingersoll Rand Inc.
$84.20 +7.2% 1M +9.0% 1Y
Market cap
$32.44B
P/E
23.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.05B
Div. yield
0.00%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ingersoll Rand leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Ingersoll Rand 8, Esab 2, Stanley Black & Decker 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionESABIRSWKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.91B $32.44B $17.78B IR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.7x 23.4x 28.6x IR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.3x 25.1x 20.4x ESAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.7% +8.0% +0.6% ESAB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.7% 17.2% 4.1% IR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.2% 10.5% 6.6% IR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.7x 1.4x 2.3x IR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% SWK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -29.9% +9.0% +77.5% SWK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +8.0%/yr -8.5%/yr IR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.3% 33.5% 38.6% IR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 68/100 58/100 IR

Percentile Scorecard

ESABIRSWK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisESABIRSWK
Valuation 57 #89 of 204 53 #97 of 204 86 #30 of 204
Growth 25 #144 of 191 84 #31 of 191 80 #39 of 191
Profitability 49 #97 of 189 84 #31 of 189 52 #92 of 189
Financial Health 23 #171 of 221 57 #95 of 221 28 #159 of 221
Shareholder Returns 21 #126 of 159 60 #65 of 159 42 #92 of 159
Overall 35 68 58
  • ESAB ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • IR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • SWK ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodESABIRSWKSPY
1 month +9.5%+7.2%+31.8% -1.0%
3 months -15.2%-6.4%+14.5% -0.4%
6 months -22.9%+7.1%+45.9% +4.5%
Year to date -29.9%+6.3%+59.2% +12.4%
1 year -29.9%+9.0%+77.5% +13.6%
3 years +4.3%+28.8%+33.0% +76.4%
3 years, per year +1.4%+8.8%+10.0% +20.8%
5 years —+47.1%-35.7% +63.7%
5 years, per year —+8.0%-8.5% +10.4%
10 years ——+3.2% +267.7%
10 years, per year ——+0.3% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureESABIRSWKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.3%33.5%38.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.4%31.3%32.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.841.191.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.630.272.01 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.3%-36.6%-71.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.9%-14.7%0.0% -1.6%
52-week high $134.82$98.76$118.24 $779.14
52-week low $64.45$68.54$62.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleESABIRSWK
P/E now vs peer median 28.1xmedian 25.5x 23.7xmedian 25.5x 28.6xmedian 25.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.9x 4.0xmedian 1.9x 1.2xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 14.4x 14.9xmedian 14.4x 12.1xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.8xmedian 23.3x 21.3xmedian 23.3x 13.9xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.2x 3.1xmedian 2.2x 2.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -3.89median 1.16 1.01median 1.16 -5.44median 1.16

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsESABIRSWK
Revenue $3.00B $8.05B $15.25B
Gross profit $1.11B $3.47B $4.86B
Operating income $362.44M $1.84B $1.32B
Net income $178.52M $1.39B $620.50M
Free cash flow $196.61M $1.52B $1.29B
EPS (diluted) $2.78 $3.53 $4.12
Cash & equivalents $217.49M $1.34B $592.40M
Total debt $2.40B $4.74B $4.76B
Shares (diluted) 61.63M 391.90M 150.65M
Enterprise value $3.28B $27.40B $16.30B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricESABIRSWK
P/E 28.1x 23.7x 28.6x
P/FCF 24.8x 21.3x 13.9x
P/Operating cash flow 18.8x 19.7x 11.5x
P/S 1.6x 4.0x 1.2x
P/B 1.9x 3.1x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 4.0x 4.9x 3.0x
EV/EBITDA 15.3x 14.9x 12.1x
EV/EBIT 19.4x 19.4x 16.7x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 4.4x 1.4x
EV/FCF 35.8x 23.6x 17.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.2x 21.8x 14.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.89 1.01 -5.44

Growth

14 metrics
MetricESABIRSWK
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.7% 8.0% 0.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.7% 6.4% -2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.4% 6.4% 9.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 8.0% 11.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -16.9% 62.6% 51.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.3% 18.6% 149.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -32.0% 152.7% 29.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -6.2% 21.7% -7.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -33.6% 158.7% 30.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -7.2% 23.5% -5.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -16.5% 18.8% 104.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.6% 12.6% 96.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -23.8% 21.4% 211.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.8% 13.4% 110.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricESABIRSWK
Gross margin 37.0% 43.1% 31.9%
EBITDA margin 15.4% 29.7% 11.9%
Operating margin 12.1% 22.9% 8.6%
Pretax margin 8.7% 20.1% 5.6%
Net margin 5.7% 17.2% 4.1%
FCF margin 6.5% 18.8% 8.5%
Operating cash flow margin 8.6% 20.4% 10.2%
Return on equity 7.4% 13.4% 6.9%
Return on assets 2.9% 7.6% 3.0%
Return on invested capital 6.2% 10.5% 6.6%
Return on capital employed 6.8% 11.8% 8.0%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.4x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.2x 2.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.7% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricESABIRSWK
Debt / assets 36.5% 25.4% 23.7%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.4x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.7x 1.4x 2.3x
Debt / FCF 12.2x 3.1x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 60.6% 43.2% 55.4%
Equity / assets 39.4% 56.8% 44.6%
Interest coverage 3.5x 7.2x 2.8x
Current ratio 2.0x 1.7x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.0x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.5x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.70 3.61 2.64

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricESABIRSWK
Dividend yield 0.6% 0.1% 2.8%
Net buyback yield – 3.0% 1.5%
Shareholder yield 0.6% 3.1% 4.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 2.2% 81.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 2.0% 39.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -3.1% 1.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -1.4% 1.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusESABIRSWK
Forward P/E 15.3xFY2026 25.1xFY2026 20.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.13FY2026 $3.35FY2026 $5.81FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -2.8%FY2026 +0.3%FY2026 +24.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.7% +21.5% +5.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.86BFY2026 $8.35BFY2026 $16.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +9.2%FY2026 +6.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.3% +6.4% +0.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersESABIRSWK
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 95.7%
Institutions holding 349 896 773
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.0% -1.5% +5.3%
Institutions buying 187 369 418
Institutions selling 111 360 244
Buyers to sellers 1.68 1.03 1.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ESABIRSWK
ESAB 1.00 0.60 0.63
IR 0.60 1.00 0.62
SWK 0.63 0.62 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ESAB, IR and SWK?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Esab (ESAB) $4.91B, Ingersoll Rand (IR) $32.44B, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) $17.78B.

Which stock is cheaper, ESAB, IR and SWK?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Esab (ESAB) 28.7x, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 23.4x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 28.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Esab (ESAB) is cheapest (Esab (ESAB) 15.3x, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 25.1x, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 20.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Esab (ESAB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Esab (ESAB) +9.7%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +8.0%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +0.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ingersoll Rand (IR) has the highest net margin (Esab (ESAB) 5.7%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 17.2%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 4.1%). On return on invested capital, Ingersoll Rand (IR) leads (Esab (ESAB) 6.2%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 10.5%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) returned the most: Esab (ESAB) -29.9%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) +9.0%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) +77.5%. Over five years, Ingersoll Rand (IR) compounded fastest (Ingersoll Rand (IR) +8.0%/yr, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) -8.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) has the highest dividend yield: Esab (ESAB) 0.00%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 0.00%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 0.03%. Esab (ESAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ingersoll Rand (IR) has been the steadiest (Esab (ESAB) 47.3%, Ingersoll Rand (IR) 33.5%, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) 38.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ESAB, IR and SWK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ingersoll Rand (IR) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.