ERIC vs FSLY vs UI Stock Comparison

Ericsson Lm Telephone, Fastly and Ubiquiti Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CSCO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ERIC Ericsson Lm Telephone Co
$10.89 +14.3% 1M +15.2% 1Y
Market cap
$36.91B
P/E
18.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$24.56B
Div. yield
-0.03%
Networking Equipment Technology
4 wins
FSLY Fastly, Inc.
$25.61 +2.6% 1M +207.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.32B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$687.17M
Div. yield
–
Content Delivery Networks Technology
2 wins
UI Ubiquiti Inc.
$585.48 +4.3% 1M -20.4% 1Y
Market cap
$36.33B
P/E
37.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.27B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ubiquiti leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Ubiquiti 5, Ericsson Lm Telephone 4, Fastly 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionERICFSLYUILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $36.91B $4.32B $36.33B ERIC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.1x -53.2x 37.8x ERIC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.8x 52.3x 31.0x ERIC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -38.5% +20.4% +27.2% UI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.3% -11.8% 29.3% UI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.0% -6.1% 72.8% UI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.6x -3.3x — FSLY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield -0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +15.2% +207.4% -20.4% FSLY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.2%/yr -11.9%/yr +14.4%/yr UI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.5% 118.6% 53.8% ERIC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 67/100 68/100 UI

Percentile Scorecard

ERICFSLYUI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisERICFSLYUI
Valuation 88 #14 of 111 49 #20 of 38 27 #81 of 111
Growth 46 #59 of 108 94 #3 of 36 90 #12 of 108
Profitability 86 #15 of 104 49 #18 of 34 99 #2 of 104
Financial Health 40 #70 of 115 81 #8 of 38 75 #30 of 115
Shareholder Returns 38 #51 of 81 60 #9 of 21 50 #41 of 81
Overall 59 67 68
  • ERIC ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FSLY ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • UI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodERICFSLYUISPY
1 month +14.3%+2.6%+4.3% -0.8%
3 months +12.6%+27.8%+8.4% +3.5%
6 months -1.5%-0.7%-42.0% +7.0%
Year to date +12.8%+151.6%+5.8% +12.2%
1 year +15.2%+207.4%-20.4% +13.0%
3 years +149.8%+81.4%+401.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +35.7%+22.0%+71.3% +23.1%
5 years -1.0%-46.9%+95.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -0.2%-11.9%+14.4% +11.0%
10 years +116.1%—+1,006.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +8.0%—+27.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureERICFSLYUISPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.5%118.6%53.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.7%108.1%59.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.031.421.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.421.75-0.38 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.8%-90.8%-70.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.7%-23.6%-46.0% -1.8%
52-week high $13.74$33.50$1,084.50 $779.14
52-week low $9.15$7.96$515.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleERICFSLYUI
P/E now vs peer median 17.8xmedian 32.0x -49.8xmedian 29.6x 36.9xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.8x 5.9xmedian 4.2x 10.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.1xmedian 19.4x 988.3xmedian 24.2x 28.9xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 29.0x 80.4xmedian 15.1x 39.0xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.9x 4.1xmedian 3.9x 24.6xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.41median 1.13 -1.88median 0.38 1.12median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsERICFSLYUI
Revenue $24.56B $687.17M $3.27B
Gross profit $11.51B $422.42M $1.51B
Operating income $2.90B -$82.21M $1.19B
Net income $2.04B -$81.10M $960.30M
Free cash flow $3.76B $50.68M $908.94M
R&D $5.22B $167.06M $204.17M
EPS (diluted) $0.61 $-0.51 $15.85
Cash & equivalents $5.11B $89.80M $522.58M
Total debt $3.73B $323.96M $180.81M
Shares (diluted) 3.34B 157.60M 60.57M
Enterprise value $14.53B $2.94B $34.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricERICFSLYUI
P/E 17.8x -49.8x 36.9x
P/FCF 9.8x 80.4x 39.0x
P/Operating cash flow 10.7x 34.1x 38.2x
P/S 1.5x 5.9x 10.8x
P/B 3.3x 4.1x 24.6x
P/Tangible book 3.3x 4.2x 24.6x
EV/EBITDA 9.1x 988.3x 28.9x
EV/EBIT 11.9x -49.4x 29.4x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 5.9x 10.6x
EV/FCF 9.2x 80.1x 38.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.0x 34.0x 37.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.41 -1.88 1.12

Growth

14 metrics
MetricERICFSLYUI
Revenue growth (1Y) -38.5% 20.4% 27.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.0% 13.6% 19.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.7% 37.3% 35.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 20.8% 25.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -18.4% 45.2% 41.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 55.0% 27.0% 29.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -18.7% 45.0% 34.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 43.4% 21.2% 33.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -17.7% 49.2% 34.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 43.1% 26.5% 33.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.3% 124.3% 45.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 44.0% 91.8% 103.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.1% 49.6% 44.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.7% 47.1% 95.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricERICFSLYUI
Gross margin 46.8% 61.5% 46.2%
EBITDA margin 15.4% 0.6% 36.8%
Operating margin 11.8% -12.0% 36.2%
Pretax margin 11.2% -12.2% 36.1%
Net margin 8.3% -11.8% 29.3%
FCF margin 15.3% 7.4% 27.8%
Operating cash flow margin 14.0% 17.4% 28.4%
Return on equity 18.7% -8.3% 72.7%
Return on assets 6.8% -5.4% 49.1%
Return on invested capital 20.0% -6.1% 72.8%
Return on capital employed 17.8% -6.0% 89.1%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x 1.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x -1.5x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 19.7% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricERICFSLYUI
Debt / assets 12.4% 21.5% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.6x -3.3x –
Debt / FCF 1.0x 6.4x –
Liabilities / assets 63.1% 34.1% 34.5%
Equity / assets 36.9% 65.9% 65.5%
Interest coverage – -6.3x –
Current ratio 1.2x 3.4x 2.9x
Quick ratio 0.8x 3.2x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.4x 2.4x 1.0x
Altman Z-score – 4.24 32.88

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricERICFSLYUI
Dividend yield 2.8% – 0.6%
Net buyback yield -2.2% -0.2% –
Shareholder yield 0.6% -0.2% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 50.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 27.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -13.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -7.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusERICFSLYUI
Forward P/E 16.8xFY2026 52.3xFY2026 31.0xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $0.65FY2026 $0.49FY2026 $18.88FY2027
EPS growth, next FY -30.9%FY2026 +276.9%FY2026 +18.4%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after -3.1% +22.4% +9.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.16BFY2026 $724.28MFY2026 $4.12BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY -8.1%FY2026 +16.1%FY2026 +25.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +1.0% +13.0% +5.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersERICFSLYUI
Held by institutions 9.5% 94.0% 4.9%
Institutions holding 388 283 354
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.4% +7.5% +8.0%
Institutions buying 219 156 163
Institutions selling 110 89 139
Buyers to sellers 1.99 1.75 1.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ERICFSLYUI
ERIC 1.00 0.13 0.17
FSLY 0.13 1.00 0.18
UI 0.17 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ERIC, FSLY and UI?

Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) $36.91B, Fastly (FSLY) $4.32B, Ubiquiti (UI) $36.33B.

Which stock is cheaper, ERIC, FSLY and UI?

Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 18.1x, Fastly (FSLY) -53.2x, Ubiquiti (UI) 37.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) is cheapest (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 16.8x, Fastly (FSLY) 52.3x, Ubiquiti (UI) 31.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ubiquiti (UI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) -38.5%, Fastly (FSLY) +20.4%, Ubiquiti (UI) +27.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ubiquiti (UI) has the highest net margin (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 8.3%, Fastly (FSLY) -11.8%, Ubiquiti (UI) 29.3%). On return on invested capital, Ubiquiti (UI) leads (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 20.0%, Fastly (FSLY) -6.1%, Ubiquiti (UI) 72.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fastly (FSLY) returned the most: Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +15.2%, Fastly (FSLY) +207.4%, Ubiquiti (UI) -20.4%. Over five years, Ubiquiti (UI) compounded fastest (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) -0.2%/yr, Fastly (FSLY) -11.9%/yr, Ubiquiti (UI) +14.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) has been the steadiest (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 36.5%, Fastly (FSLY) 118.6%, Ubiquiti (UI) 53.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ERIC, FSLY and UI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ubiquiti (UI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.