ERIC vs FFIV vs FSLY Stock Comparison

Ericsson Lm Telephone, F5 and Fastly Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (UI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ERIC Ericsson Lm Telephone Co
$10.89 +14.3% 1M +15.2% 1Y
Market cap
$36.91B
P/E
18.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$24.56B
Div. yield
-0.03%
Networking Equipment Technology
4 wins
FFIV F5, Inc.
$461.60 +4.2% 1M +54.7% 1Y
Market cap
$26.15B
P/E
36.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.31B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
3 wins
FSLY Fastly, Inc.
$25.61 +2.6% 1M +207.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.32B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$687.17M
Div. yield
–
Content Delivery Networks Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ericsson Lm Telephone leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ericsson Lm Telephone 4, Fastly 4, F5 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionERICFFIVFSLYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $36.91B $26.15B $4.32B ERIC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.1x 36.0x -53.2x ERIC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.8x 28.4x 52.3x ERIC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -38.5% +9.4% +20.4% FSLY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.3% 22.0% -11.8% FFIV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.0% — -6.1% ERIC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.6x — -3.3x FSLY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield -0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +15.2% +54.7% +207.4% FSLY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.2%/yr +16.4%/yr -11.9%/yr FFIV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.5% 35.1% 118.6% FFIV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 64/100 67/100 FSLY

Percentile Scorecard

ERICFFIVFSLY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisERICFFIVFSLY
Valuation 88 #14 of 111 75 #32 of 124 49 #20 of 38
Growth 46 #59 of 108 40 #68 of 113 94 #3 of 36
Profitability 86 #15 of 104 94 #8 of 110 49 #18 of 34
Financial Health 40 #70 of 115 52 #63 of 129 81 #8 of 38
Shareholder Returns 38 #51 of 81 59 #28 of 67 60 #9 of 21
Overall 59 64 67
  • ERIC ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FFIV ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FSLY ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodERICFFIVFSLYSPY
1 month +14.3%+4.2%+2.6% -0.8%
3 months +12.6%+13.1%+27.8% +3.5%
6 months -1.5%+55.0%-0.7% +7.0%
Year to date +12.8%+80.8%+151.6% +12.2%
1 year +15.2%+54.7%+207.4% +13.0%
3 years +149.8%+208.2%+81.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +35.7%+45.6%+22.0% +23.1%
5 years -1.0%+113.7%-46.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -0.2%+16.4%-11.9% +11.0%
10 years +116.1%+286.1%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +8.0%+14.5%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureERICFFIVFSLYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.5%35.1%118.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.7%34.6%108.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.031.081.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.421.561.75 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.8%-47.4%-90.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.7%-3.8%-23.6% -1.8%
52-week high $13.74$479.83$33.50 $779.14
52-week low $9.15$223.99$7.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleERICFFIVFSLY
P/E now vs peer median 17.8xmedian 32.0x 36.0xmedian 38.1x -49.8xmedian 29.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.8x 7.9xmedian 4.3x 5.9xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.1xmedian 19.4x 27.1xmedian 35.4x 988.3xmedian 24.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 29.0x 27.1xmedian 27.1x 80.4xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.9x 6.8xmedian 3.4x 4.1xmedian 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.41median 1.13 1.13median 1.27 -1.88median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsERICFFIVFSLY
Revenue $24.56B $3.31B $687.17M
Gross profit $11.51B $2.71B $422.42M
Operating income $2.90B $812.13M -$82.21M
Net income $2.04B $726.51M -$81.10M
Free cash flow $3.76B $969.60M $50.68M
R&D $5.22B $593.25M $167.06M
EPS (diluted) $0.61 $12.62 $-0.51
Cash & equivalents $5.11B $1.61B $89.80M
Total debt $3.73B – $323.96M
Shares (diluted) 3.34B 57.55M 157.60M
Enterprise value $14.53B $20.55B $2.94B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricERICFFIVFSLY
P/E 17.8x 36.0x -49.8x
P/FCF 9.8x 27.1x 80.4x
P/Operating cash flow 10.7x 25.0x 34.1x
P/S 1.5x 7.9x 5.9x
P/B 3.3x 6.8x 4.1x
P/Tangible book 3.3x 6.8x 4.2x
EV/EBITDA 9.1x 27.1x 988.3x
EV/EBIT 11.9x 30.3x -49.4x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 7.4x 5.9x
EV/FCF 9.2x 25.4x 80.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.0x 23.5x 34.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.41 1.13 -1.88

Growth

14 metrics
MetricERICFFIVFSLY
Revenue growth (1Y) -38.5% 9.4% 20.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.0% 5.7% 13.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.7% 10.5% 37.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 7.1% 20.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -18.4% 8.1% 45.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 55.0% 25.8% 27.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -18.7% 8.9% 45.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 43.4% 29.8% 21.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -17.7% 10.7% 49.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 43.1% 31.9% 26.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.3% 6.2% 124.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 44.0% 19.3% 91.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.1% 1.5% 49.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.7% 19.3% 47.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricERICFFIVFSLY
Gross margin 46.8% 81.9% 61.5%
EBITDA margin 15.4% 27.5% 0.6%
Operating margin 11.8% 24.5% -12.0%
Pretax margin 11.2% 25.8% -12.2%
Net margin 8.3% 22.0% -11.8%
FCF margin 15.3% 29.3% 7.4%
Operating cash flow margin 14.0% 31.7% 17.4%
Return on equity 18.7% 19.4% -8.3%
Return on assets 6.8% 10.9% -5.4%
Return on invested capital 20.0% – -6.1%
Return on capital employed 17.8% 16.6% -6.0%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.4x -1.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 7.6% 19.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricERICFFIVFSLY
Debt / assets 12.4% – 21.5%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.6x – -3.3x
Debt / FCF 1.0x – 6.4x
Liabilities / assets 63.1% 43.5% 34.1%
Equity / assets 36.9% 56.5% 65.9%
Interest coverage – – -6.3x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.7x 3.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.5x 3.2x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.9x 2.4x
Altman Z-score – 7.16 4.24

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricERICFFIVFSLY
Dividend yield 2.8% – –
Net buyback yield -2.2% 0.6% -0.2%
Shareholder yield 0.6% 0.6% -0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 50.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 27.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -13.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -7.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusERICFFIVFSLY
Forward P/E 16.8xFY2026 28.4xFY2026 52.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.65FY2026 $16.24FY2026 $0.49FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -30.9%FY2026 +2.7%FY2026 +276.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.1% +5.0% +22.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $24.16BFY2026 $3.52BFY2026 $724.28MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -8.1%FY2026 +13.8%FY2026 +16.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.0% +6.4% +13.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersERICFFIVFSLY
Held by institutions 9.5% 96.6% 94.0%
Institutions holding 388 831 283
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.4% -2.6% +7.5%
Institutions buying 219 483 156
Institutions selling 110 240 89
Buyers to sellers 1.99 2.01 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ERICFFIVFSLY
ERIC 1.00 0.23 0.13
FFIV 0.23 1.00 0.20
FSLY 0.13 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ERIC, FFIV and FSLY?

Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) $36.91B, F5 (FFIV) $26.15B, Fastly (FSLY) $4.32B.

Which stock is cheaper, ERIC, FFIV and FSLY?

Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 18.1x, F5 (FFIV) 36.0x, Fastly (FSLY) -53.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) is cheapest (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 16.8x, F5 (FFIV) 28.4x, Fastly (FSLY) 52.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fastly (FSLY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) -38.5%, F5 (FFIV) +9.4%, Fastly (FSLY) +20.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

F5 (FFIV) has the highest net margin (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 8.3%, F5 (FFIV) 22.0%, Fastly (FSLY) -11.8%). On return on invested capital, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) leads (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 20.0%, Fastly (FSLY) -6.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fastly (FSLY) returned the most: Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +15.2%, F5 (FFIV) +54.7%, Fastly (FSLY) +207.4%. Over five years, F5 (FFIV) compounded fastest (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) -0.2%/yr, F5 (FFIV) +16.4%/yr, Fastly (FSLY) -11.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, F5 (FFIV) has been the steadiest (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 36.5%, F5 (FFIV) 35.1%, Fastly (FSLY) 118.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ERIC, FFIV and FSLY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.