EPD vs GLNG vs ET Stock Comparison

Enterprise Products Partners, Golar Lng and Energy Transfer Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TRGP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GLNG Golar Lng Ltd
$46.74 -3.1% 1M +15.0% 1Y
Market cap
$4.74B
P/E
29.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$523.38M
Div. yield
2.14%
LNG and Gas Processing Energy
4 wins
ET Energy Transfer LP
$20.90 +5.0% 1M +23.4% 1Y
Market cap
$71.96B
P/E
14.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38B
Div. yield
6.45%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Enterprise Products Partners leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Enterprise Products Partners 4, Energy Transfer 4, Golar Lng 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEPDGLNGETLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $84.33B $4.74B $71.96B EPD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.8x 29.5x 14.3x EPD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.6x 42.1x 11.6x ET
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.5% +109.6% +33.3% GLNG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 31.3% 4.7% GLNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 22.6% 8.4% GLNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 5.3x 4.0x ET
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.65% 2.14% 6.45% ET
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.5% +15.0% +23.4% EPD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.5%/yr +29.1%/yr +17.1%/yr GLNG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 18.8% 27.2% 17.5% ET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 60/100 60/100 EPD

Percentile Scorecard

EPDGLNGET

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEPDGLNGET
Valuation 88 #5 of 35 24 #27 of 35 94 #3 of 35
Growth 49 #18 of 34 91 #4 of 34 55 #16 of 34
Profitability – 80 #7 of 31 37 #20 of 31
Financial Health – 75 #9 of 33 53 #16 of 33
Shareholder Returns 77 #8 of 31 30 #22 of 31 63 #12 of 31
Overall 71 60 60
  • EPD ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • GLNG ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEPDGLNGETSPY
1 month +8.4%-3.1%+5.0% +0.7%
3 months +2.5%-3.1%+3.3% +3.7%
6 months +0.9%-15.0%+3.5% +7.1%
Year to date +21.8%+25.6%+26.7% +12.8%
1 year +25.5%+15.0%+23.4% +11.9%
3 years +47.7%+108.6%+58.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +13.9%+27.8%+16.7% +22.8%
5 years +72.2%+258.7%+119.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year +11.5%+29.1%+17.1% +10.9%
10 years +52.7%+106.7%+38.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +4.3%+7.5%+3.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEPDGLNGETSPY
Volatility, 1Y 18.8%27.2%17.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 18.1%27.3%16.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.320.13-0.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.360.551.34 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -19.5%-34.1%-25.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.9%-18.5%-3.9% -1.2%
52-week high $39.80$57.36$21.74 $779.14
52-week low $30.22$35.33$16.21 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEPDGLNGET
P/E now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 19.6x 29.5xmedian 19.6x 14.3xmedian 19.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.8x 9.0xmedian 2.8x 0.7xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.1x 19.3xmedian 11.1x 8.3xmedian 11.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.5xmedian 16.9x 8.1xmedian 16.9x 13.8xmedian 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.4x 2.4xmedian 2.4x 1.4xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.80median 1.68 1.94median 1.68 2.04median 1.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEPDGLNGET
Revenue $64.40B $523.38M $107.38B
Gross profit – $343.33M $25.32B
Operating income $8.16B $273.22M $10.78B
Net income – $226.50M $7.04B
Free cash flow – $583.87M $5.22B
R&D – $14.62M –
EPS (diluted) $3.02 $1.49 $1.46
Cash & equivalents – $870.50M $1.02B
Total debt – $2.68B $68.41B
Shares (diluted) 2.19B 109.49M 3.46B
Enterprise value $84.33B $1.34B $65.40B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEPDGLNGET
P/E 12.8x 29.5x 14.3x
P/FCF 22.5x 8.1x 13.8x
P/Operating cash flow 9.1x 11.2x 5.9x
P/S 1.3x 9.0x 0.7x
P/B – 2.4x 1.4x
P/Tangible book – 2.4x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA – 19.3x 8.3x
EV/EBIT – 23.9x 12.9x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 12.5x 1.3x
EV/FCF – 11.2x 26.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.1x 15.5x 11.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.80 1.94 2.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEPDGLNGET
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.5% 109.6% 33.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.7% 23.3% 10.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 147.7% 18.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 19.9% 13.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.1% 1,754% 16.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.4% 104.0% 12.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – 894.0% 16.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 18.5% 9.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 14.0% 2,539% 12.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.1% 15.2% 7.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.9% 1.1% 8.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 11.3% 5.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -5.5% -8.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 60.4% -7.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEPDGLNGET
Gross margin – 65.6% 23.6%
EBITDA margin – 64.6% 15.7%
Operating margin – 52.2% 10.0%
Pretax margin – 62.0% 7.1%
Net margin – 31.3% 4.7%
FCF margin – 111.6% 4.9%
Operating cash flow margin 14.5% 80.8% 11.3%
Return on equity – 1,387% 14.0%
Return on assets – 4.2% 4.8%
Return on invested capital – 22.6% 8.4%
Return on capital employed – 5.6% 8.4%
Asset turnover – 0.1x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.9x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.9% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEPDGLNGET
Debt / assets – 50.1% 46.2%
Debt / equity – 1.4x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 5.3x 4.0x
Debt / FCF – 4.6x 13.1x
Liabilities / assets – 63.6% 65.9%
Equity / assets – 36.4% 34.1%
Interest coverage – 16.5x 2.9x
Current ratio – 2.3x 1.2x
Quick ratio – 2.2x 0.9x
Cash ratio – 1.8x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEPDGLNGET
Dividend yield 5.6% 2.1% 6.4%
Net buyback yield – 0.7% –
Shareholder yield 5.6% 2.9% 6.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 67.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 91.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 2.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 8.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEPDGLNGET
Forward P/E 13.6xFY2026 42.1xFY2026 11.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.87FY2026 $1.11FY2026 $1.80FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +7.9%FY2026 -27.5%FY2026 +48.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.1% -53.2% -9.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $66.68BFY2026 $409.44MFY2026 $124.23BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +26.8%FY2026 +4.0%FY2026 +45.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.5% -2.6% +1.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEPDGLNGET
Held by institutions 24.8% 81.4% 31.4%
Institutions holding 1,582 311 1,281
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% -0.4% +1.9%
Institutions buying 670 153 628
Institutions selling 436 105 341
Buyers to sellers 1.54 1.46 1.84

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EPDGLNGET
EPD 1.00 0.24 0.61
GLNG 0.24 1.00 0.35
ET 0.61 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EPD, GLNG and ET?

Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) $84.33B, Golar Lng (GLNG) $4.74B, Energy Transfer (ET) $71.96B.

Which stock is cheaper, EPD, GLNG and ET?

Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) 12.8x, Golar Lng (GLNG) 29.5x, Energy Transfer (ET) 14.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Energy Transfer (ET) is cheapest (Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) 13.6x, Golar Lng (GLNG) 42.1x, Energy Transfer (ET) 11.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Golar Lng (GLNG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) +21.5%, Golar Lng (GLNG) +109.6%, Energy Transfer (ET) +33.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Golar Lng (GLNG) has the highest net margin (Golar Lng (GLNG) 31.3%, Energy Transfer (ET) 4.7%). On return on invested capital, Golar Lng (GLNG) leads (Golar Lng (GLNG) 22.6%, Energy Transfer (ET) 8.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) returned the most: Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) +25.5%, Golar Lng (GLNG) +15.0%, Energy Transfer (ET) +23.4%. Over five years, Golar Lng (GLNG) compounded fastest (Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) +11.5%/yr, Golar Lng (GLNG) +29.1%/yr, Energy Transfer (ET) +17.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Energy Transfer (ET) has the highest dividend yield: Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) 5.65%, Golar Lng (GLNG) 2.14%, Energy Transfer (ET) 6.45%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Transfer (ET) has been the steadiest (Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) 18.8%, Golar Lng (GLNG) 27.2%, Energy Transfer (ET) 17.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EPD, GLNG and ET?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.