ENLT vs BEP-PA Stock Comparison

Enlight Renewable Energy and Brookfield Renewable Partners Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Enlight Renewable Energy leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Enlight Renewable Energy 7, Brookfield Renewable Partners 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionENLTBEP-PALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.06B $7.94B ENLT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 100.9x -8.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +36.5% +7.6% ENLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.3% -14.5% ENLT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.9% 4.9% ENLT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 8.5x ENLT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.14% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +101.7% -9.3% ENLT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -8.7%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.0% 18.5% BEP-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 36/100 ENLT

Percentile Scorecard

ENLTBEP-PA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisENLTBEP-PA
Valuation 30 #17 of 24 52 #12 of 24
Growth 86 #4 of 23 14 #20 of 23
Profitability 96 #2 of 23 59 #10 of 23
Financial Health 70 #8 of 24 22 #19 of 24
Shareholder Returns 26 #15 of 20 32 #14 of 20
Overall 62 36
  • ENLT ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation
  • BEP-PA ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodENLTBEP-PASPY
1 month -0.2%+2.8% -0.8%
3 months -24.1%-1.3% +3.5%
6 months -22.4%-9.4% +7.0%
Year to date +52.6%-7.8% +12.2%
1 year +101.7%-9.3% +13.0%
3 years +468.1%+9.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +78.5%+3.0% +23.1%
5 years —-36.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-8.7% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureENLTBEP-PASPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.0%18.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.6%21.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.100.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.72-0.50 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.3%-42.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.4%-10.9% -1.8%
52-week high $107.42$18.89 $779.14
52-week low $34.10$16.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleENLTBEP-PA
P/E now vs peer median 95.6xmedian 24.4x -8.3xmedian 24.4x
P/S now vs peer median 15.7xmedian 2.7x 1.2xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.7xmedian 11.3x 11.1xmedian 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 12.9x -6.0xmedian 12.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 2.1x 2.1xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 137.41median 0.59 —median 0.59

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsENLTBEP-PA
Revenue $585.20M $6.54B
Gross profit $414.52M $3.53B
Operating income $300.63M $1.17B
Net income $122.32M -$1.08B
Free cash flow $1.37B -$1.31B
R&D $15.41M –
EPS (diluted) $0.68 –
Cash & equivalents $1.16B $1.97B
Total debt $4.75B $32.05B
Shares (diluted) 132.62M –
Enterprise value $5.61B -$17.22B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricENLTBEP-PA
P/E 95.6x -8.3x
P/FCF 6.7x -6.0x
P/Operating cash flow 27.7x 5.2x
P/S 15.7x 1.2x
P/B 4.2x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 5.0x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 19.7x 11.1x
EV/EBIT 31.4x 28.2x
EV/Revenue 16.1x 5.0x
EV/FCF 6.9x -25.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 28.5x 21.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 137.41 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricENLTBEP-PA
Revenue growth (1Y) 36.5% 7.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 34.4% 9.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 39.3% 2.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 42.3% 0.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -1.9% -9.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 30.8% -8.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -12.6% -386.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.5% -76.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -27.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 0.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 34.6% 6.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.7% 8.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 155.4% -7.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 76.5% -40.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricENLTBEP-PA
Gross margin 70.8% 53.9%
EBITDA margin 81.6% 45.1%
Operating margin 51.4% 17.8%
Pretax margin 28.4% 47.9%
Net margin 15.3% -14.5%
FCF margin 234.3% -20.0%
Operating cash flow margin 56.5% 23.2%
Return on equity 5.3% 14.3%
Return on assets 1.2% 0.5%
Return on invested capital 7.9% 4.9%
Return on capital employed 3.5% 1.4%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.7x -1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricENLTBEP-PA
Debt / assets 13.7% 33.1%
Debt / equity 0.7x 8.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 8.5x
Debt / FCF 1.0x -24.5x
Liabilities / assets 79.3% 96.1%
Equity / assets 20.7% 3.9%
Interest coverage 4.5x 1.0x
Current ratio 1.1x 0.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 0.87 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricENLTBEP-PA
Dividend yield – 0.0%
Net buyback yield -7.7% –
Shareholder yield -7.7% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -102.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – -84.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusENLTBEP-PA
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.42FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $7.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +13.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -2.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersENLTBEP-PA
Held by institutions 31.2% –
Institutions holding 174 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -20.2% –
Institutions buying 130 –
Institutions selling 28 –
Buyers to sellers 4.64 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ENLTBEP-PA
ENLT 1.00 0.16
BEP-PA 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ENLT and BEP-PA?

Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) $9.06B, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) $7.94B.

Which company is growing faster?

Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) +36.5%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) has the highest net margin (Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) 15.3%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -14.5%). On return on invested capital, Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) leads (Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) 7.9%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 4.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) returned the most: Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) +101.7%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -9.3%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) 0.00%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 0.14%. Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) has been the steadiest (Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) 59.0%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 18.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do ENLT and BEP-PA move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.16, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, ENLT and BEP-PA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.