ENLT vs BEP-PA vs WAVE Stock Comparison

Enlight Renewable Energy, Brookfield Renewable Partners and Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Enlight Renewable Energy leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Enlight Renewable Energy 7, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) 1, Brookfield Renewable Partners 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionENLTBEP-PAWAVELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.38B $7.93B $216.46M ENLT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 93.3x -8.4x -62.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +36.5% +7.6% — ENLT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.3% -14.5% — ENLT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.9% 4.9% — ENLT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 8.5x — ENLT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.14% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +102.1% -8.4% -42.4% ENLT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -8.5%/yr -7.9%/yr WAVE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.2% 18.5% 70.6% BEP-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 36/100 33/100 ENLT

Percentile Scorecard

ENLTBEP-PAWAVE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisENLTBEP-PAWAVE
Valuation 30 #17 of 24 57 #11 of 24 0 #24 of 24
Growth 86 #4 of 23 14 #20 of 23 36 #15 of 23
Profitability 96 #2 of 23 59 #10 of 23 5 #22 of 23
Financial Health 70 #8 of 24 22 #19 of 24 91 #3 of 24
Shareholder Returns 26 #15 of 20 32 #14 of 20 –
Overall 62 36 33
  • ENLT ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation
  • BEP-PA ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation
  • WAVE ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodENLTBEP-PAWAVESPY
1 month +5.5%+3.9%-27.6% -0.2%
3 months -15.6%-1.4%-40.6% +3.9%
6 months -17.4%-8.9%-41.4% +8.2%
Year to date +61.2%-6.8%-25.0% +12.9%
1 year +102.1%-8.4%-42.4% +12.3%
3 years +500.3%+10.3%+86.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year +81.8%+3.3%+23.1% +23.3%
5 years —-35.9%-33.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-8.5%-7.9% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureENLTBEP-PAWAVESPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.2%18.5%70.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.6%21.2%63.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.110.261.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.73-0.45-0.60 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.3%-42.3%-86.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -31.8%-10.0%-55.8% -1.2%
52-week high $107.42$18.89$9.92 $779.14
52-week low $34.10$16.15$4.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleENLTBEP-PAWAVE
P/E now vs peer median 101.1xmedian 25.0x -8.4xmedian 25.0x -58.6xmedian 25.0x
P/S now vs peer median 16.6xmedian 2.8x 1.2xmedian 2.8x —median 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.8xmedian 11.5x 11.2xmedian 11.5x —median 11.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 13.6x -6.1xmedian 13.6x —median 13.6x
P/B now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 2.1x 2.1xmedian 2.1x 26.7xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 145.22median 0.60 —median 0.60 —median 0.60

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsENLTBEP-PAWAVE
Revenue $585.20M $6.54B –
Gross profit $414.52M $3.53B –
Operating income $300.63M $1.17B -$3.00M
Net income $122.32M -$1.08B -$3.50M
Free cash flow $1.37B -$1.31B –
R&D $15.41M – $747.00K
EPS (diluted) $0.68 – –
Cash & equivalents $1.16B $1.97B $8.15M
Total debt $4.75B $32.05B $4.83M
Shares (diluted) 132.62M – –
Enterprise value $4.93B -$17.23B $189.39M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricENLTBEP-PAWAVE
P/E 101.1x -8.4x -58.6x
P/FCF 7.1x -6.1x –
P/Operating cash flow 29.3x 5.2x –
P/S 16.6x 1.2x –
P/B 4.5x 2.1x 26.7x
P/Tangible book 5.2x 2.1x 26.7x
EV/EBITDA 20.8x 11.2x –
EV/EBIT 33.1x 28.3x -66.0x
EV/Revenue 17.0x 5.0x –
EV/FCF 7.3x -25.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 30.1x 21.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 145.22 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricENLTBEP-PAWAVE
Revenue growth (1Y) 36.5% 7.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 34.4% 9.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 39.3% 2.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 42.3% 0.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -1.9% -9.9% -16.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 30.8% -8.5% -1.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -12.6% -386.7% -17.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.5% -76.2% -14.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -27.6% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 0.7% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 34.6% 6.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.7% 8.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 155.4% -7.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 76.5% -40.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricENLTBEP-PAWAVE
Gross margin 70.8% 53.9% –
EBITDA margin 81.6% 45.1% –
Operating margin 51.4% 17.8% –
Pretax margin 28.4% 47.9% –
Net margin 15.3% -14.5% –
FCF margin 234.3% -20.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 56.5% 23.2% –
Return on equity 5.3% 14.3% -56.2%
Return on assets 1.2% 0.5% -40.5%
Return on invested capital 7.9% 4.9% –
Return on capital employed 3.5% 1.4% -48.6%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.7x -1.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricENLTBEP-PAWAVE
Debt / assets 13.7% 33.1% 12.0%
Debt / equity 0.7x 8.6x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 8.5x –
Debt / FCF 1.0x -24.5x –
Liabilities / assets 79.3% 96.1% 24.5%
Equity / assets 20.7% 3.9% 75.5%
Interest coverage 4.5x 1.0x -2.9x
Current ratio 1.1x 0.8x 3.5x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.8x 3.4x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.5x 3.3x
Altman Z-score 0.91 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricENLTBEP-PAWAVE
Dividend yield – 0.0% –
Net buyback yield -7.3% – –
Shareholder yield -7.3% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – -102.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -84.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 8.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusENLTBEP-PAWAVE
EPS, next fiscal year – $-1.42FY2026 $-0.74FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year – $7.26BFY2026 $179.29KFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +13.3%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – -2.7% +35.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersENLTBEP-PAWAVE
Held by institutions 31.2% – 1.2%
Institutions holding 174 – 22
Change in shares held, QoQ -20.2% – +520.8%
Institutions buying 130 – 14
Institutions selling 28 – 2
Buyers to sellers 4.64 – 7.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ENLTBEP-PAWAVE
ENLT 1.00 0.16 0.00
BEP-PA 0.16 1.00 -0.02
WAVE 0.00 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ENLT, BEP-PA and WAVE?

Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) $8.38B, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) $7.93B, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) $216.46M.

Which company is growing faster?

Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) +36.5%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) has the highest net margin (Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) 15.3%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -14.5%). On return on invested capital, Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) leads (Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) 7.9%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 4.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) returned the most: Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) +102.1%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -8.4%, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) -42.4%. Over five years, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) compounded fastest (Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) -8.5%/yr, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) -7.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) 0.00%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 0.14%, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) 0.00%. Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) and Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) has been the steadiest (Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) 59.2%, Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP-PA) 18.5%, Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) 70.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ENLT, BEP-PA and WAVE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Enlight Renewable Energy (ENLT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.