EMR vs MSA vs PH Stock Comparison

Emerson Electric, MSA Safety and Parker-Hannifin Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ITT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$166.25 +5.2% 1M +23.6% 1Y
Market cap
$93.37B
P/E
36.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
1 win
MSA MSA Safety Inc
$179.23 -1.8% 1M +7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.84B
P/E
21.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.95B
Div. yield
–
Power Tools Industrials
6 wins
PH Parker-Hannifin Corp
$900.70 -7.9% 1M +16.3% 1Y
Market cap
$115.16B
P/E
31.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.50B
Div. yield
–
Pumps and Valves Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

MSA Safety leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (MSA Safety 6, Parker-Hannifin 4, Emerson Electric 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEMRMSAPHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $93.37B $6.84B $115.16B PH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.2x 21.8x 31.6x MSA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.6x 19.2x 23.7x MSA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.8% +6.5% +8.3% PH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% 16.1% 17.0% PH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% 15.9% 15.4% MSA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.8x 1.4x MSA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +23.6% +7.5% +16.3% EMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.3%/yr +3.2%/yr +24.5%/yr PH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.8% 25.5% 27.1% MSA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 78/100 57/100 MSA

Percentile Scorecard

EMRMSAPH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEMRMSAPH
Valuation 34 #134 of 203 58 #86 of 203 29 #144 of 203
Growth 40 #114 of 188 86 #27 of 188 67 #62 of 188
Profitability 86 #26 of 183 97 #6 of 183 95 #11 of 183
Financial Health 29 #154 of 217 76 #54 of 217 44 #123 of 217
Shareholder Returns 36 #99 of 153 74 #40 of 153 52 #74 of 153
Overall 45 78 57
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • MSA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • PH ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEMRMSAPHSPY
1 month +5.2%-1.8%-7.9% -0.2%
3 months +9.5%-0.3%-9.1% +3.9%
6 months +20.1%+7.2%-6.4% +8.2%
Year to date +25.3%+11.9%+2.5% +12.9%
1 year +23.6%+7.5%+16.3% +12.3%
3 years +88.9%+13.7%+145.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +23.6%+4.4%+35.0% +23.3%
5 years +70.5%+16.9%+198.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year +11.3%+3.2%+24.5% +10.9%
10 years +233.6%+224.9%+640.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year +12.8%+12.5%+22.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEMRMSAPHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.8%25.5%27.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.5%24.1%26.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.540.810.83 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.740.290.60 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -29.9%-34.9%-29.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-11.7%-16.1% -1.2%
52-week high $166.25$203.08$1,073.86 $779.14
52-week low $123.30$152.94$767.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEMRMSAPH
P/E now vs peer median 36.0xmedian 25.2x 22.0xmedian 25.2x 31.2xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 1.9x 3.6xmedian 1.9x 5.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.8xmedian 14.0x 15.0xmedian 14.0x 21.8xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.8xmedian 21.7x 19.5xmedian 21.7x 29.1xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 2.3x 4.9xmedian 2.3x 7.4xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.87median 1.32 0.12median 1.32 1.48median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEMRMSAPH
Revenue $18.64B $1.95B $21.50B
Gross profit $9.91B $925.88M $8.10B
Operating income $4.68B $413.17M $4.63B
Net income $2.58B $314.01M $3.65B
Free cash flow $3.46B $354.30M $3.91B
R&D – $68.19M –
EPS (diluted) $4.59 $8.11 $28.48
Cash & equivalents $2.18B $200.06M $501.00M
Total debt $13.11B $599.74M $8.52B
Shares (diluted) 561.10M 38.70M 128.10M
Enterprise value $86.11B $6.12B $113.28B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEMRMSAPH
P/E 36.0x 22.0x 31.2x
P/FCF 26.8x 19.5x 29.1x
P/Operating cash flow 23.7x 17.0x 26.0x
P/S 5.0x 3.6x 5.3x
P/B 4.5x 4.9x 7.4x
P/Tangible book 7.9x 6.2x 14.0x
EV/EBITDA 16.8x 15.0x 21.8x
EV/EBIT 22.2x 17.7x 26.2x
EV/Revenue 5.6x 3.8x 5.7x
EV/FCF 29.9x 20.7x 31.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.5x 18.0x 27.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.87 0.12 1.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEMRMSAPH
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.8% 6.5% 8.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 5.2% 4.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% 8.2% 10.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 6.7% 8.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.2% 10.8% 14.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 34.5% 14.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.0% 13.4% 3.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -42.0% 186.8% 20.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.2% 15.3% 5.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.6% 188.5% 21.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% 26.3% 15.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 96.0% 13.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% 40.3% 16.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% 72.1% 14.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEMRMSAPH
Gross margin 53.2% 47.6% 37.7%
EBITDA margin 33.1% 25.1% 25.9%
Operating margin 25.1% 21.2% 21.6%
Pretax margin 17.6% 21.1% 21.2%
Net margin 13.8% 16.1% 17.0%
FCF margin 18.6% 18.2% 18.2%
Operating cash flow margin 21.0% 20.9% 20.3%
Return on equity 12.7% 22.8% 24.3%
Return on assets 6.1% 12.2% 11.9%
Return on invested capital 10.9% 15.9% 15.4%
Return on capital employed 14.9% 18.0% 18.8%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.3x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 1.0% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEMRMSAPH
Debt / assets 31.1% 23.1% 27.6%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.4x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.8x 1.4x
Debt / FCF 3.8x 1.7x 2.2x
Liabilities / assets 51.7% 46.1% 50.1%
Equity / assets 48.3% 53.9% 49.9%
Interest coverage – 12.7x 11.6x
Current ratio 0.9x 3.2x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.9x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.7x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 4.71 5.92 6.77

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEMRMSAPH
Dividend yield 1.3% 1.2% 0.8%
Net buyback yield 1.0% 1.8% 1.1%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 3.0% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 47.8% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.1% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEMRMSAPH
Forward P/E 24.6xFY2026 19.2xFY2026 23.7xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $6.75FY2026 $9.33FY2026 $37.94FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026 +17.4%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +15.3% +3.4% +8.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.13BFY2026 $1.98BFY2026 $23.49BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2026 +5.2%FY2026 +9.2%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +15.3% +19.6% +22.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEMRMSAPH
Held by institutions 82.1% 91.0% 91.8%
Institutions holding 2,290 457 1,975
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +3.0% +1.2%
Institutions buying 1,080 236 927
Institutions selling 798 147 693
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.61 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EMRMSAPH
EMR 1.00 0.48 0.54
MSA 0.48 1.00 0.44
PH 0.54 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EMR, MSA and PH?

Parker-Hannifin (PH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Electric (EMR) $93.37B, MSA Safety (MSA) $6.84B, Parker-Hannifin (PH) $115.16B.

Which stock is cheaper, EMR, MSA and PH?

MSA Safety (MSA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Emerson Electric (EMR) 36.2x, MSA Safety (MSA) 21.8x, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 31.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, MSA Safety (MSA) is cheapest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.6x, MSA Safety (MSA) 19.2x, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 23.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Parker-Hannifin (PH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, MSA Safety (MSA) +6.5%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) +8.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Parker-Hannifin (PH) has the highest net margin (Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, MSA Safety (MSA) 16.1%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 17.0%). On return on invested capital, MSA Safety (MSA) leads (Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, MSA Safety (MSA) 15.9%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 15.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Emerson Electric (EMR) returned the most: Emerson Electric (EMR) +23.6%, MSA Safety (MSA) +7.5%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) +16.3%. Over five years, Parker-Hannifin (PH) compounded fastest (Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.3%/yr, MSA Safety (MSA) +3.2%/yr, Parker-Hannifin (PH) +24.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Emerson Electric (EMR) 0.01%, MSA Safety (MSA) 0.00%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 0.00%. MSA Safety (MSA) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MSA Safety (MSA) has been the steadiest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%, MSA Safety (MSA) 25.5%, Parker-Hannifin (PH) 27.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EMR, MSA and PH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, MSA Safety (MSA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.