EMR vs KLAC vs PNR Stock Comparison

Emerson Electric, Kla and Pentair Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FLS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$162.51 +0.7% 1M +22.7% 1Y
Market cap
$90.65B
P/E
35.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
1.37%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
2 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$129.80 -34.3% 1M +5.8% 1Y
Market cap
$169.12B
P/E
32.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.51B
Div. yield
0.36%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
7 wins
PNR PENTAIR plc
$69.80 +31.8% 1M -35.3% 1Y
Market cap
$11.14B
P/E
18.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.97B
Div. yield
1.55%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kla leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Kla 7, Pentair 3, Emerson Electric 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEMRKLACPNRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.65B $169.12B $11.14B KLAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.2x 32.2x 18.2x PNR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.1x 22.9x 15.2x PNR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.8% +15.8% -3.9% KLAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% 36.2% 15.4% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% 43.4% 12.5% KLAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.6x 1.6x KLAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.37% 0.36% 1.55% PNR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +22.7% +5.8% -35.3% EMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.7%/yr +25.5%/yr -1.2%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.1% 63.7% 37.1% EMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 60/100 59/100 KLAC

Percentile Scorecard

EMRKLACPNR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEMRKLACPNR
Valuation 28 #147 of 204 42 #55 of 94 61 #80 of 204
Growth 38 #118 of 191 51 #46 of 92 30 #135 of 191
Profitability 84 #31 of 189 97 #4 of 90 80 #38 of 189
Financial Health 31 #152 of 221 21 #80 of 101 47 #118 of 221
Shareholder Returns 30 #111 of 159 88 #11 of 81 77 #37 of 159
Overall 42 60 59
  • EMR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • PNR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEMRKLACPNRSPY
1 month +0.7%-34.3%+31.8% -5.9%
3 months +3.6%-32.8%-0.1% -4.6%
6 months +15.2%-26.4%-11.6% +0.2%
Year to date +22.4%+6.8%-33.0% +7.5%
1 year +22.7%+5.8%-35.3% +8.2%
3 years +77.1%+160.2%+14.4% +68.3%
3 years, per year +21.0%+37.6%+4.6% +19.0%
5 years +65.9%+211.5%-6.1% +56.5%
5 years, per year +10.7%+25.5%-1.2% +9.4%
10 years +228.9%+1,641.8%+27.6% +251.5%
10 years, per year +12.6%+33.1%+2.5% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureEMRKLACPNRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.1%63.7%37.1% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.0%69.6%40.7% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.502.780.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.710.09-0.95 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -29.9%-57.0%-53.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.8%-57.0%-35.8% -5.9%
52-week high $170.76$301.71$108.69 $779.14
52-week low $123.30$109.71$52.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEMRKLACPNR
P/E now vs peer median 35.2xmedian 23.4x 32.2xmedian 35.6x 18.2xmedian 23.4x
P/S now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 1.7x 11.7xmedian 5.8x 2.8xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.5xmedian 13.4x 26.3xmedian 21.9x 14.0xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.2xmedian 21.9x 41.9xmedian 30.7x 17.2xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 2.1x 25.9xmedian 3.5x 2.9xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median -0.85median 1.02 1.53median 1.25 2.37median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEMRKLACPNR
Revenue $18.64B $14.51B $3.97B
Gross profit $9.91B $8.92B $1.64B
Operating income $4.68B $6.19B $777.40M
Net income $2.58B $5.26B $612.20M
Free cash flow $3.46B $4.04B $646.60M
R&D – $1.57B $94.10M
EPS (diluted) $4.59 $4.01 $3.82
Cash & equivalents $2.18B $1.53B $74.00M
Total debt $13.11B $5.72B $1.48B
Shares (diluted) 561.10M 1.31B 160.30M
Enterprise value $83.40B $161.70B $10.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEMRKLACPNR
P/E 35.2x 32.2x 18.2x
P/FCF 26.2x 41.9x 17.2x
P/Operating cash flow 23.2x 37.5x 15.4x
P/S 4.9x 11.7x 2.8x
P/B 4.4x 25.9x 2.9x
P/Tangible book 7.7x 26.8x 3.9x
EV/EBITDA 16.5x 26.3x 14.0x
EV/EBIT 21.7x 28.0x 16.1x
EV/Revenue 5.5x 11.9x 3.2x
EV/FCF 29.3x 42.9x 19.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.0x 38.4x 17.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.85 1.53 2.37

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEMRKLACPNR
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.8% 15.8% -3.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 12.6% -1.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% 16.1% -1.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 13.8% 3.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.2% 18.2% -8.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 17.8% 4.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.0% 24.1% -6.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -42.0% 19.2% 6.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.2% 25.3% -3.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.6% 21.0% 7.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% 6.2% -14.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 8.4% 6.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% 4.1% -17.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% 7.9% 7.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEMRKLACPNR
Gross margin 53.2% 61.5% 41.2%
EBITDA margin 33.1% 45.4% 22.7%
Operating margin 25.1% 42.6% 19.6%
Pretax margin 17.6% 42.2% 17.5%
Net margin 13.8% 36.2% 15.4%
FCF margin 18.6% 27.8% 16.3%
Operating cash flow margin 21.0% 31.1% 18.3%
Return on equity 12.7% 81.7% 16.1%
Return on assets 6.1% 28.9% 9.2%
Return on invested capital 10.9% 43.4% 12.5%
Return on capital employed 14.9% 45.4% 13.5%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 0.9x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 2.2% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEMRKLACPNR
Debt / assets 31.1% 31.1% 22.3%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.9x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.6x 1.6x
Debt / FCF 3.8x 1.4x 2.3x
Liabilities / assets 51.7% 64.6% 42.1%
Equity / assets 48.3% 35.4% 57.9%
Interest coverage – 22.0x –
Current ratio 0.9x 2.8x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.0x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 4.65 11.26 4.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEMRKLACPNR
Dividend yield 1.4% 0.4% 1.5%
Net buyback yield 1.0% 1.5% 3.6%
Shareholder yield 2.4% 1.9% 5.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 47.8% 21.1% 28.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% 27.5% 26.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.1% 15.7% 6.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 15.2% 6.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEMRKLACPNR
Forward P/E 24.1xFY2026 22.9xFY2027 15.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.75FY2026 $5.67FY2027 $4.60FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027 -6.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +14.8% +16.6% +18.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.13BFY2026 $19.18BFY2027 $3.94BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027 -5.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.3% +8.6% +16.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEMRKLACPNR
Held by institutions 82.1% 91.0% 95.0%
Institutions holding 2,294 2,483 721
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +4.2% -0.1%
Institutions buying 1,083 1,287 353
Institutions selling 799 985 257
Buyers to sellers 1.36 1.31 1.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EMRKLACPNR
EMR 1.00 0.52 0.36
KLAC 0.52 1.00 0.19
PNR 0.36 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EMR, KLAC and PNR?

Kla (KLAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Electric (EMR) $90.65B, Kla (KLAC) $169.12B, Pentair (PNR) $11.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, EMR, KLAC and PNR?

Pentair (PNR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Emerson Electric (EMR) 35.2x, Kla (KLAC) 32.2x, Pentair (PNR) 18.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Pentair (PNR) is cheapest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.1x, Kla (KLAC) 22.9x, Pentair (PNR) 15.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kla (KLAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Kla (KLAC) +15.8%, Pentair (PNR) -3.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Kla (KLAC) 36.2%, Pentair (PNR) 15.4%). On return on invested capital, Kla (KLAC) leads (Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, Kla (KLAC) 43.4%, Pentair (PNR) 12.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Emerson Electric (EMR) returned the most: Emerson Electric (EMR) +22.7%, Kla (KLAC) +5.8%, Pentair (PNR) -35.3%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Emerson Electric (EMR) +10.7%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +25.5%/yr, Pentair (PNR) -1.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Pentair (PNR) has the highest dividend yield: Emerson Electric (EMR) 1.37%, Kla (KLAC) 0.36%, Pentair (PNR) 1.55%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Electric (EMR) has been the steadiest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 32.1%, Kla (KLAC) 63.7%, Pentair (PNR) 37.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EMR, KLAC and PNR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kla (KLAC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.