EMR vs KLAC vs FLS Stock Comparison

Emerson Electric, Kla and Flowserve Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$170.76 +8.6% 1M +25.2% 1Y
Market cap
$91.78B
P/E
35.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
0.01%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
3 wins
KLAC Kla Corp
$167.43 -14.8% 1M +35.5% 1Y
Market cap
$205.56B
P/E
39.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.51B
Div. yield
0.01%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
8 wins
FLS Flowserve Corp
$80.17 +8.5% 1M +16.3% 1Y
Market cap
$10.05B
P/E
39.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.70B
Div. yield
–
Pumps and Valves Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kla leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Kla 8, Emerson Electric 3, Flowserve 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEMRKLACFLSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $91.78B $205.56B $10.05B KLAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.6x 39.1x 39.4x EMR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.3x 29.5x 18.5x FLS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.8% +15.8% +0.2% KLAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.8% 36.2% 5.4% KLAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% 43.4% 8.1% KLAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.6x 2.3x KLAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% EMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.2% +35.5% +16.3% KLAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.0%/yr +35.1%/yr +19.0%/yr KLAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.8% 61.7% 42.1% EMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 59/100 40/100 KLAC

Percentile Scorecard

EMRKLACFLS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEMRKLACFLS
Valuation 33 #136 of 203 39 #58 of 94 26 #150 of 203
Growth 41 #112 of 188 56 #41 of 92 31 #130 of 188
Profitability 87 #24 of 183 95 #5 of 88 43 #104 of 183
Financial Health 30 #152 of 216 20 #77 of 96 34 #144 of 216
Shareholder Returns 35 #99 of 152 83 #13 of 72 68 #50 of 152
Overall 45 59 40
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • KLAC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • FLS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEMRKLACFLSSPY
1 month +8.6%-14.8%+8.5% +0.7%
3 months +14.9%-7.2%+6.4% +3.7%
6 months +21.6%-4.3%+8.9% +7.1%
Year to date +28.7%+37.8%+15.6% +12.8%
1 year +25.2%+35.5%+16.3% +11.9%
3 years +93.1%+264.3%+119.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +24.5%+53.9%+29.9% +22.8%
5 years +76.0%+349.2%+138.5% +67.6%
5 years, per year +12.0%+35.1%+19.0% +10.9%
10 years +240.9%+2,142.6%+89.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year +13.1%+36.5%+6.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEMRKLACFLSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.8%61.7%42.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.5%65.7%42.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.532.791.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.790.580.39 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -29.9%-51.7%-39.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-44.5%-12.9% -1.2%
52-week high $170.76$301.71$92.04 $779.14
52-week low $123.30$109.71$64.39 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEMRKLACFLS
P/E now vs peer median 37.0xmedian 25.8x 41.6xmedian 46.4x 40.0xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 1.9x 15.0xmedian 7.8x 2.2xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.2xmedian 14.6x 33.8xmedian 27.5x 19.9xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.5xmedian 22.2x 54.0xmedian 40.1x 66.2xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 2.2x 33.4xmedian 4.7x 4.3xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.89median 1.45 1.98median 2.10 17.37median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEMRKLACFLS
Revenue $18.64B $14.51B $4.70B
Gross profit $9.91B $8.92B $1.60B
Operating income $4.68B $6.19B $467.63M
Net income $2.58B $5.26B $273.27M
Free cash flow $3.46B $4.04B $153.66M
R&D – $1.57B –
EPS (diluted) $4.59 $4.01 $1.99
Cash & equivalents $2.18B $1.53B $742.15M
Total debt $13.11B $5.72B $2.06B
Shares (diluted) 561.10M 1.31B 127.96M
Enterprise value $84.52B $198.14B $7.02B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEMRKLACFLS
P/E 37.0x 41.6x 40.0x
P/FCF 27.5x 54.0x 66.2x
P/Operating cash flow 24.3x 48.3x 44.2x
P/S 5.1x 15.0x 2.2x
P/B 4.7x 33.4x 4.3x
P/Tangible book 8.1x 34.6x 5.0x
EV/EBITDA 17.2x 33.8x 19.9x
EV/EBIT 22.7x 35.9x 24.6x
EV/Revenue 5.7x 15.3x 2.4x
EV/FCF 30.7x 55.1x 74.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.1x 49.3x 49.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.89 1.98 17.37

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEMRKLACFLS
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.8% 15.8% 0.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.6% 12.6% 3.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% 16.1% 5.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 13.8% 9.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.2% 18.2% -3.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 17.8% 12.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.0% 24.1% -42.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -42.0% 19.2% 1.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.2% 25.3% -42.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -41.6% 21.0% 2.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% 6.2% -67.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.1% 8.4% 4.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% 4.1% -75.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.4% 7.9% 7.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEMRKLACFLS
Gross margin 53.2% 61.5% 34.2%
EBITDA margin 33.1% 45.4% 12.3%
Operating margin 25.1% 42.6% 10.0%
Pretax margin 17.6% 42.2% 7.6%
Net margin 13.8% 36.2% 5.4%
FCF margin 18.6% 27.8% 3.3%
Operating cash flow margin 21.0% 31.1% 4.9%
Return on equity 12.7% 81.7% 11.6%
Return on assets 6.1% 28.9% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 10.9% 43.4% 8.1%
Return on capital employed 14.9% 45.4% 9.7%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 0.9x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 2.2% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEMRKLACFLS
Debt / assets 31.1% 31.1% 32.4%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.9x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.6x 2.3x
Debt / FCF 3.8x 1.4x 13.4x
Liabilities / assets 51.7% 64.6% 62.4%
Equity / assets 48.3% 35.4% 37.6%
Interest coverage – 22.0x 5.1x
Current ratio 0.9x 2.8x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.0x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 4.77 13.74 3.82

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEMRKLACFLS
Dividend yield 1.3% 0.3% 1.1%
Net buyback yield 1.0% 1.2% 1.3%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 1.5% 2.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 47.8% 21.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% 27.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 3.1% 15.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 15.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEMRKLACFLS
Forward P/E 25.3xFY2026 29.5xFY2027 18.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.75FY2026 $5.67FY2027 $4.34FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.5%FY2026 +50.8%FY2027 +19.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.3% +16.6% +12.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.13BFY2026 $19.18BFY2027 $4.72BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2026 +41.2%FY2027 -0.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.3% +8.6% +5.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEMRKLACFLS
Held by institutions 82.1% 91.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,292 2,479 585
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +4.2% +14.6%
Institutions buying 1,081 1,285 299
Institutions selling 799 983 202
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.31 1.48

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EMRKLACFLS
EMR 1.00 0.49 0.60
KLAC 0.49 1.00 0.56
FLS 0.60 0.56 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EMR, KLAC and FLS?

Kla (KLAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Emerson Electric (EMR) $91.78B, Kla (KLAC) $205.56B, Flowserve (FLS) $10.05B.

Which stock is cheaper, EMR, KLAC and FLS?

Emerson Electric (EMR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Emerson Electric (EMR) 35.6x, Kla (KLAC) 39.1x, Flowserve (FLS) 39.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Flowserve (FLS) is cheapest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 25.3x, Kla (KLAC) 29.5x, Flowserve (FLS) 18.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kla (KLAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%, Kla (KLAC) +15.8%, Flowserve (FLS) +0.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kla (KLAC) has the highest net margin (Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%, Kla (KLAC) 36.2%, Flowserve (FLS) 5.4%). On return on invested capital, Kla (KLAC) leads (Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%, Kla (KLAC) 43.4%, Flowserve (FLS) 8.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kla (KLAC) returned the most: Emerson Electric (EMR) +25.2%, Kla (KLAC) +35.5%, Flowserve (FLS) +16.3%. Over five years, Kla (KLAC) compounded fastest (Emerson Electric (EMR) +12.0%/yr, Kla (KLAC) +35.1%/yr, Flowserve (FLS) +19.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest dividend yield: Emerson Electric (EMR) 0.01%, Kla (KLAC) 0.01%, Flowserve (FLS) 0.00%. Flowserve (FLS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Electric (EMR) has been the steadiest (Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%, Kla (KLAC) 61.7%, Flowserve (FLS) 42.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EMR, KLAC and FLS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kla (KLAC) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.