EMAT vs REEMF vs SGML Stock Comparison

Evolution Metals & Technologies, Rare Element Resources and Sigma Lithium Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (USAR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SGML Sigma Lithium Corp
$5.53 -39.2% 1M +3.2% 1Y
Market cap
$623.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$142.49M
Div. yield
–
Lithium Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Sigma Lithium leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Sigma Lithium 4, Evolution Metals & Technologies 1, Rare Element Resources 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEMATREEMFSGMLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.17B $536.58M $623.35M EMAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.6x -86.3x -22.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 17.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +7.3% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -9,992.8% — -19.3% SGML
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 0.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -86.3% -17.6% +3.2% SGML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -15.0%/yr -10.3%/yr SGML
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 190.1% 114.8% 114.5% SGML
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 11/100 62/100 49/100 REEMF

Percentile Scorecard

EMATREEMFSGML

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEMATREEMFSGML
Valuation 25 #127 of 168 31 #117 of 168 50 #85 of 168
Growth 1 #150 of 152 58 #65 of 152 78 #34 of 152
Profitability 7 #115 of 124 – 48 #65 of 124
Financial Health 10 #149 of 166 97 #6 of 166 21 #131 of 166
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 11 62 49
  • EMAT ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • REEMF ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SGML ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEMATREEMFSGMLSPY
1 month -19.6%+14.1%-39.2% -2.0%
3 months -43.3%+89.4%-50.2% -2.2%
6 months -82.7%+25.4%-75.5% +4.2%
Year to date -85.1%+25.4%-58.1% +10.6%
1 year -86.3%-17.6%+3.2% +10.4%
3 years -84.7%+89.4%-78.7% +73.6%
3 years, per year -46.5%+23.7%-40.3% +20.2%
5 years —-55.5%-41.8% +61.6%
5 years, per year —-15.0%-10.3% +10.1%
10 years —+1,680.0%— +261.3%
10 years, per year —+33.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEMATREEMFSGMLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 190.1%114.8%114.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 158.6%98.4%104.1% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.490.522.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.45-0.150.03 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.7%-92.0%-89.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -92.3%-44.4%-76.6% -3.2%
52-week high $21.29$1.60$23.65 $779.14
52-week low $1.35$0.38$4.68 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEMATREEMFSGML
P/E now vs peer median -2.3xmedian 12.4x -89.3xmedian 12.4x -22.3xmedian 12.4x
P/S now vs peer median 225.0xmedian 2.9x —median 2.9x 4.3xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.2x —median 7.2x 22.3xmedian 7.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -52.5xmedian 14.8x -57.9xmedian 14.8x 25.4xmedian 14.8x
P/B now vs peer median -54.1xmedian 2.1x 12.0xmedian 2.1x 7.5xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.07median 0.26 -2.51median 0.26 -0.54median 0.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEMATREEMFSGML
Revenue $4.53M – $142.49M
Gross profit – – $70.02M
Operating income -$28.67M – $10.66M
Net income -$452.97M -$6.22M -$27.56M
Free cash flow -$19.42M -$9.92M $24.30M
R&D – $4.89M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.73 $-0.01 $-0.25
Cash & equivalents $5.25M $26.81M $16.66M
Total debt $6.18M $92.00K $21.45M
Shares (diluted) 621.76M 623.92M 111.31M
Enterprise value $1.15B $419.85M $590.52M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEMATREEMFSGML
P/E -2.3x -89.3x -22.3x
P/FCF -52.5x -57.9x 25.4x
P/Operating cash flow -87.3x -58.8x 16.3x
P/S 225.0x – 4.3x
P/B -54.1x 12.0x 7.5x
P/Tangible book -40.5x 12.0x 7.5x
EV/EBITDA – – 22.3x
EV/EBIT -35.6x – 58.2x
EV/Revenue 225.2x – 4.4x
EV/FCF -52.6x -55.0x 25.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -87.4x -55.8x 16.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.07 -2.51 -0.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEMATREEMFSGML
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 7.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 130.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -332.1% – 40.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -659.7% 49.1% 42.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -529.4% 13.4% 39.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -455.6% 57.9% 42.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -33.4% 35.6% 41.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -118.3% -66.6% 148.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -133.3% -0.9% 41.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -262.8% -32.0% 14,876%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -176.4% -1.5% 30.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEMATREEMFSGML
Gross margin – – 49.1%
EBITDA margin – – 19.5%
Operating margin -632.5% – 7.5%
Pretax margin -9,994% – -6.9%
Net margin -9,993% – -19.3%
FCF margin -428.4% – 17.1%
Operating cash flow margin -257.8% – 26.5%
Return on equity – – -17.5%
Return on assets -501.3% – -3.4%
Return on invested capital – – 0.0%
Return on capital employed – – 7.9%
Asset turnover 0.1x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 1.6x -1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – 7.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEMATREEMFSGML
Debt / assets 6.5% 0.2% 4.5%
Debt / equity -0.3x 0.0x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.2x
Debt / FCF -0.3x 0.0x 0.9x
Liabilities / assets 119.8% 3.3% 82.8%
Equity / assets -19.8% 96.7% 17.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.2x 23.0x 0.3x
Quick ratio 0.2x 22.5x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 20.8x 0.1x
Altman Z-score -13.23 – 0.08

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEMATREEMFSGML
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEMATREEMFSGML
Forward P/E – – 17.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.43FY2026 – $0.31FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +419.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $15.71MFY2026 – $174.11MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +124.4%FY2026 – +58.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2,427.0% – +144.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEMATREEMFSGML
Held by institutions – – 33.1%
Institutions holding – – 119
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +9.7%
Institutions buying – – 65
Institutions selling – – 40
Buyers to sellers – – 1.63

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EMATREEMFSGML
EMAT 1.00 0.00 0.19
REEMF 0.00 1.00 0.00
SGML 0.19 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EMAT, REEMF and SGML?

Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) $1.17B, Rare Element Resources (REEMF) $536.58M, Sigma Lithium (SGML) $623.35M.

Which company is more profitable?

Sigma Lithium (SGML) has the highest net margin (Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) -9,992.8%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) -19.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sigma Lithium (SGML) returned the most: Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) -86.3%, Rare Element Resources (REEMF) -17.6%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) +3.2%. Over five years, Sigma Lithium (SGML) compounded fastest (Rare Element Resources (REEMF) -15.0%/yr, Sigma Lithium (SGML) -10.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sigma Lithium (SGML) has been the steadiest (Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) 190.1%, Rare Element Resources (REEMF) 114.8%, Sigma Lithium (SGML) 114.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EMAT, REEMF and SGML?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sigma Lithium (SGML) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.