EMAT vs COBA vs REEMF Stock Comparison

Evolution Metals & Technologies, Chilean Cobalt and Rare Element Resources Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TMC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
COBA Chilean Cobalt Corp.
$2.10 -8.7% 1M +425.0% 1Y
Market cap
$121.74M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Rare Element Resources leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Rare Element Resources 2, Evolution Metals & Technologies 1, Chilean Cobalt 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEMATCOBAREEMFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.22B $121.74M $502.38M EMAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.7x -35.9x -44.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -9,992.8% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -84.7% +425.0% -17.4% COBA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -16.1%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 189.8% 149.6% 114.8% REEMF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 11/100 39/100 60/100 REEMF

Percentile Scorecard

EMATCOBAREEMF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEMATCOBAREEMF
Valuation 26 #126 of 169 35 #111 of 169 26 #125 of 169
Growth 1 #151 of 153 15 #131 of 153 36 #99 of 153
Profitability 7 #114 of 123 10 #111 of 123 –
Financial Health 10 #148 of 165 98 #4 of 165 98 #5 of 165
Shareholder Returns – – 79 #25 of 116
Overall 11 39 60
  • EMAT ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • COBA ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • REEMF ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEMATCOBAREEMFSPY
1 month -0.5%-8.7%-14.6% -5.9%
3 months -29.0%-19.2%+65.2% -4.6%
6 months -79.5%+10.5%+8.6% +0.2%
Year to date -82.6%-14.6%+7.0% +7.5%
1 year -84.7%+425.0%-17.4% +8.2%
3 years -82.1%—+68.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year -43.7%—+19.1% +19.0%
5 years ——-58.5% +56.5%
5 years, per year ——-16.1% +9.4%
10 years ——+1,420.0% +251.5%
10 years, per year ——+31.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureEMATCOBAREEMFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 189.8%149.6%114.8% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 158.6%142.1%98.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.44-0.850.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.452.84-0.15 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.7%-89.5%-91.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -91.0%-30.2%-52.5% -5.9%
52-week high $21.29$3.01$1.60 $779.14
52-week low $1.35$0.32$0.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEMATCOBAREEMF
P/E now vs peer median -2.6xmedian 12.9x -35.9xmedian 12.9x -42.2xmedian 12.9x
P/S now vs peer median 262.0xmedian 3.1x —median 3.1x —median 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.6x —median 7.6x —median 7.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -61.2xmedian 12.2x -94.0xmedian 12.2x -39.3xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median -63.0xmedian 2.2x 26.1xmedian 2.2x 11.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.08median 0.19 1.33median 0.19 -1.42median 0.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEMATCOBAREEMF
Revenue $4.53M – –
Operating income -$28.67M -$1.54M –
Net income -$452.97M -$3.35M -$11.24M
Free cash flow -$19.42M -$1.29M -$12.47M
R&D – $101.94K –
EPS (diluted) $-0.73 $-0.06 $-0.02
Cash & equivalents $5.25M $3.02M $13.35M
Total debt $6.18M – $92.00K
Shares (diluted) 621.76M 57.17M 623.92M
Enterprise value $1.20B $113.89M $462.62M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEMATCOBAREEMF
P/E -2.6x -35.9x -42.2x
P/FCF -61.2x -94.0x -39.3x
P/Operating cash flow -101.6x -94.0x -40.1x
P/S 262.0x – –
P/B -63.0x 26.1x 11.1x
P/Tangible book -47.1x 26.1x 11.1x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -41.5x -76.9x –
EV/Revenue 262.2x – –
EV/FCF -61.2x -91.7x -36.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -101.7x -91.7x -36.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.08 1.33 -1.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEMATCOBAREEMF
Revenue growth (1Y) – – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -332.1% -44.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -7.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) -659.7% -217.7% -76.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -529.4% -39.9% -0.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -455.6% -141.7% -46.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -33.4% -27.0% 29.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -118.3% -44.0% -94.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -133.3% -14.2% -0.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -262.8% -44.0% -56.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -176.4% -14.2% -1.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEMATCOBAREEMF
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin -632.5% – –
Pretax margin -9,994% – –
Net margin -9,993% – –
FCF margin -428.4% – –
Operating cash flow margin -257.8% – –
Return on equity – -93.1% –
Return on assets -501.3% -90.7% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – -43.3% –
Asset turnover 0.1x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 0.4x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEMATCOBAREEMF
Debt / assets 6.5% – 0.2%
Debt / equity -0.3x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF -0.3x – 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 119.8% 2.7% 4.2%
Equity / assets -19.8% 97.3% 95.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.2x 24.8x 26.9x
Quick ratio 0.2x 23.4x 26.4x
Cash ratio 0.1x 23.4x 25.0x
Altman Z-score -12.34 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEMATCOBAREEMF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – 0.0%
Shareholder yield – – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEMATCOBAREEMF
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.43FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $15.71MFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +124.4%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +2,427.0% – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EMATCOBAREEMF
EMAT 1.00 0.09 0.00
COBA 0.09 1.00 0.01
REEMF 0.00 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EMAT, COBA and REEMF?

Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) $1.22B, Chilean Cobalt (COBA) $121.74M, Rare Element Resources (REEMF) $502.38M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chilean Cobalt (COBA) returned the most: Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) -84.7%, Chilean Cobalt (COBA) +425.0%, Rare Element Resources (REEMF) -17.4%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rare Element Resources (REEMF) has been the steadiest (Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) 189.8%, Chilean Cobalt (COBA) 149.6%, Rare Element Resources (REEMF) 114.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EMAT, COBA and REEMF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rare Element Resources (REEMF) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.