ELTP vs GRML vs BHC Stock Comparison

Elite Pharmaceuticals, Greenland Mines and Bausch Health Companies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd
$5.79 -60.5% 1M +929.2% 1Y
Market cap
$14.52M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Elite Pharmaceuticals leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Elite Pharmaceuticals 6, Bausch Health Companies 2, Greenland Mines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionELTPGRMLBHCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $259.61M $14.52M $2.37B BHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.6x -0.7x -2.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 1.3x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.7% — +10.1% ELTP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 40.2% — -10.1% ELTP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 29.2% — 4.6% ELTP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.0x — 8.9x ELTP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -61.9% +929.2% +2.6% GRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +43.1%/yr — -25.5%/yr ELTP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.5% 445.7% 54.8% BHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 88/100 34/100 60/100 ELTP

Percentile Scorecard

ELTPGRMLBHC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisELTPGRMLBHC
Valuation 98 #16 of 626 13 #542 of 626 99 #9 of 626
Growth 91 #53 of 604 2 #590 of 604 44 #341 of 604
Profitability 91 #51 of 555 68 #179 of 555 84 #90 of 555
Financial Health 76 #157 of 658 78 #147 of 658 15 #561 of 658
Shareholder Returns 86 #53 of 368 7 #342 of 368 –
Overall 88 34 60
  • ELTP ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • GRML ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • BHC ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodELTPGRMLBHCSPY
1 month -7.7%-60.5%+11.8% -0.8%
3 months -36.8%+2,947.4%+41.6% +3.5%
6 months -31.4%+1,129.8%+14.0% +7.0%
Year to date -51.0%+1,903.5%-8.5% +12.2%
1 year -61.9%+929.2%+2.6% +13.0%
3 years +100.0%-45.8%-3.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +26.0%-18.5%-1.1% +23.1%
5 years +500.0%—-77.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +43.1%—-25.5% +11.0%
10 years +50.0%—-70.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year +4.1%—-11.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureELTPGRMLBHCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.5%445.7%54.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 71.6%158.9%48.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.692.770.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.082.080.05 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.4%-99.0%-84.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.7%-61.1%-19.5% -1.8%
52-week high $0.68$14.89$7.90 $779.14
52-week low $0.22$0.17$4.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleELTPGRMLBHC
P/E now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 17.1x -0.7xmedian 17.1x -2.2xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 8.8x —median 8.8x 0.2xmedian 8.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.1xmedian 17.1x —median 17.1x 10.0xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.8xmedian 18.0x -1.0xmedian 18.0x 1.7xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 2.1x 0.3xmedian 2.1x -1.3xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 0.31 0.01median 0.31 0.03median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsELTPGRMLBHC
Revenue $141.01M – $10.85B
Gross profit $61.31M – $7.80B
Operating income $34.94M -$18.67M $883.00M
Net income $56.67M -$21.77M -$1.10B
Free cash flow $17.53M -$14.22M $1.43B
R&D $6.10M $1.28M $663.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.05 $-8.60 $-2.90
Cash & equivalents $39.42M $9.34M $1.83B
Total debt $9.58M $2.07M $20.74B
Shares (diluted) 1.13B 2.53M 378.10M
Enterprise value $141.29M -$19.35M -$3.37B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricELTPGRMLBHC
P/E 4.6x -0.7x -2.2x
P/FCF 14.8x -1.0x 1.7x
P/Operating cash flow 13.6x -1.0x 1.3x
P/S 1.8x – 0.2x
P/B 2.5x 0.3x -1.3x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 1.6x -0.4x
EV/EBITDA 6.1x – 10.0x
EV/EBIT 6.3x -0.3x 24.1x
EV/Revenue 1.6x – 2.0x
EV/FCF 12.6x -0.4x 14.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.6x -0.4x 11.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 0.01 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricELTPGRMLBHC
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.7% – 10.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 58.4% – 9.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.2% – 11.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 53.5% – 9.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -6.7% -127.6% -44.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 101.7% -166.2% 14.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 624.0% -91.7% -1,721%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 134.4% -125.4% -76.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 596.0% 48.6% -1,206%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 118.3% -48.2% -79.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.2% -158.2% 19.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 152.2% -236.9% 83.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -2.8% -158.2% 28.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 81.0% -236.9% 62.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricELTPGRMLBHC
Gross margin 43.5% – 71.8%
EBITDA margin 25.9% – 19.6%
Operating margin 24.8% – 8.1%
Pretax margin 46.2% – -6.7%
Net margin 40.2% – -10.1%
FCF margin 12.4% – 13.2%
Operating cash flow margin 13.5% – 16.6%
Return on equity 55.6% -39.8% –
Return on assets 40.8% -34.9% -4.4%
Return on invested capital 29.2% – 4.6%
Return on capital employed 32.2% -30.5% 4.4%
Asset turnover 1.0x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 0.7x -1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – 2.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricELTPGRMLBHC
Debt / assets 1.7% 0.5% 83.7%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.0x -11.7x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.0x – 8.9x
Debt / FCF 0.1x 0.0x 14.5x
Liabilities / assets 24.9% 10.9% 107.1%
Equity / assets 75.1% 89.1% -7.1%
Interest coverage 69.4x -2,872x 0.5x
Current ratio 3.8x 10.1x 1.4x
Quick ratio 3.0x 7.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.3x 7.7x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 6.31 – 0.09

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricELTPGRMLBHC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.1% -49.5% –
Shareholder yield -0.1% -49.5% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusELTPGRMLBHC
Forward P/E – – 1.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $4.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +26.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -13.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $11.45BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +11.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – -0.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersELTPGRMLBHC
Held by institutions 0.0% 12.0% 63.3%
Institutions holding 1 47 221
Change in shares held, QoQ – +96.3% +1.9%
Institutions buying 1 34 99
Institutions selling 0 2 63
Buyers to sellers – 17.00 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ELTPGRMLBHC
ELTP 1.00 -0.04 0.02
GRML -0.04 1.00 0.09
BHC 0.02 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ELTP, GRML and BHC?

Bausch Health Companies (BHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) $259.61M, Greenland Mines (GRML) $14.52M, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $2.37B.

Which company is growing faster?

Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) +33.7%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +10.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) has the highest net margin (Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) 40.2%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -10.1%). On return on invested capital, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) leads (Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) 29.2%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 4.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenland Mines (GRML) returned the most: Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) -61.9%, Greenland Mines (GRML) +929.2%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +2.6%. Over five years, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) compounded fastest (Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) +43.1%/yr, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -25.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) has been the steadiest (Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) 57.5%, Greenland Mines (GRML) 445.7%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 54.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ELTP, GRML and BHC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.