ELTP vs GRML vs BHC Stock Comparison

Elite Pharmaceuticals, Greenland Mines and Bausch Health Companies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AMPH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd
$5.14 -50.5% 1M +895.7% 1Y
Market cap
$13.01M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Elite Pharmaceuticals leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Elite Pharmaceuticals 3, Bausch Health Companies 1, Greenland Mines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionELTPGRMLBHCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $247.74M $13.01M $3.32B BHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.4x -0.6x -4.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 1.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.7% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 40.2% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 29.2% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.0x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -61.7% +895.7% +50.7% GRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +41.9%/yr — -20.6%/yr ELTP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.5% 444.8% 60.6% ELTP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 89/100 33/100 — ELTP

Percentile Scorecard

ELTPGRMLBHC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisELTPGRMLBHC
Valuation 99 #10 of 624 13 #546 of 624 97 #19 of 624
Growth 92 #52 of 601 2 #587 of 601 34 #399 of 601
Profitability 91 #48 of 541 69 #171 of 541 –
Financial Health 76 #157 of 647 77 #147 of 647 –
Shareholder Returns 86 #53 of 359 5 #342 of 359 –
Overall 89 33 –
  • ELTP ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • GRML ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • BHC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodELTPGRMLBHCSPY
1 month 0.0%-50.5%+53.3% +0.7%
3 months -37.8%+2,470.0%+47.4% +3.7%
6 months -32.4%+967.5%+55.4% +7.1%
Year to date -53.1%+1,678.5%+27.9% +12.8%
1 year -61.7%+895.7%+50.7% +11.9%
3 years +91.7%-51.9%+32.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +24.2%-21.7%+9.9% +22.8%
5 years +475.0%—-68.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +41.9%—-20.6% +10.9%
10 years +35.3%—-56.3% +262.0%
10 years, per year +3.1%—-7.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureELTPGRMLBHCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.5%444.8%60.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 72.3%158.6%47.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.712.770.83 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.072.010.84 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.4%-99.0%-84.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -66.2%-65.5%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $0.68$14.89$8.89 $779.14
52-week low $0.22$0.17$4.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleELTPGRMLBHC
P/E now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 17.8x -0.6xmedian 17.8x -4.0xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 9.1x —median 9.1x 0.2xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 15.0x —median 15.0x —median 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 21.7x -0.9xmedian 21.7x 1.5xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 2.2x 0.2xmedian 2.2x —median 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 0.35 0.01median 0.35 -0.72median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsELTPGRMLBHC
Revenue $141.01M – –
Gross profit $61.31M – –
Operating income $34.94M -$18.67M $1.25B
Net income $56.67M -$21.77M –
Free cash flow $17.53M -$14.22M –
R&D $6.10M $1.28M $638.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.05 $-8.60 $-2.22
Cash & equivalents $39.42M $9.34M –
Total debt $9.58M $2.07M –
Shares (diluted) 1.13B 2.53M 378.10M
Enterprise value $129.41M -$20.87M $3.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricELTPGRMLBHC
P/E 4.4x -0.6x -4.0x
P/FCF 14.1x -0.9x 1.5x
P/Operating cash flow 13.0x -0.9x –
P/S 1.8x – 0.2x
P/B 2.4x 0.2x –
P/Tangible book 2.5x 1.4x –
EV/EBITDA 5.8x – –
EV/EBIT 6.0x -0.2x –
EV/Revenue 1.5x – –
EV/FCF 12.0x -0.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.1x -0.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 0.01 -0.72

Growth

14 metrics
MetricELTPGRMLBHC
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.7% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 58.4% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.2% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 53.5% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -6.7% -127.6% -34.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 101.7% -166.2% 50.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 624.0% -91.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 134.4% -125.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 596.0% 48.6% -330.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 118.3% -48.2% 5.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.2% -158.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 152.2% -236.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -2.8% -158.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 81.0% -236.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricELTPGRMLBHC
Gross margin 43.5% – –
EBITDA margin 25.9% – –
Operating margin 24.8% – –
Pretax margin 46.2% – –
Net margin 40.2% – –
FCF margin 12.4% – –
Operating cash flow margin 13.5% – –
Return on equity 55.6% -39.8% –
Return on assets 40.8% -34.9% –
Return on invested capital 29.2% – –
Return on capital employed 32.2% -30.5% –
Asset turnover 1.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 0.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricELTPGRMLBHC
Debt / assets 1.7% 0.5% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.0x – –
Debt / FCF 0.1x 0.0x –
Liabilities / assets 24.9% 10.9% –
Equity / assets 75.1% 89.1% –
Interest coverage 69.4x -2,872x –
Current ratio 3.8x 10.1x –
Quick ratio 3.0x 7.7x –
Cash ratio 1.3x 7.7x –
Altman Z-score 6.12 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricELTPGRMLBHC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.1% -55.8% –
Shareholder yield -0.1% -55.8% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusELTPGRMLBHC
Forward P/E – – 1.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $4.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +26.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -13.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $11.45BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +11.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – -0.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersELTPGRMLBHC
Held by institutions 0.0% 12.0% 63.3%
Institutions holding 1 47 221
Change in shares held, QoQ – +96.3% +1.9%
Institutions buying 1 34 99
Institutions selling 0 2 63
Buyers to sellers – 17.00 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ELTPGRMLBHC
ELTP 1.00 -0.04 -0.02
GRML -0.04 1.00 0.07
BHC -0.02 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ELTP, GRML and BHC?

Bausch Health Companies (BHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) $247.74M, Greenland Mines (GRML) $13.01M, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $3.32B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenland Mines (GRML) returned the most: Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) -61.7%, Greenland Mines (GRML) +895.7%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +50.7%. Over five years, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) compounded fastest (Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) +41.9%/yr, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -20.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) has been the steadiest (Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) 57.5%, Greenland Mines (GRML) 444.8%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 60.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ELTP, GRML and BHC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.