ELA vs BMHL vs BRLT Stock Comparison

Envela, Bluemount Holdings and Brilliant Earth Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (VRA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ELA Envela Corp
$10.81 -10.7% 1M +10.6% 1Y
Market cap
$278.73M
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$293.04M
Div. yield
–
Jewelry Consumer Discretionary
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Envela leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Envela 8, Brilliant Earth 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionELABMHLBRLTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $278.73M $82.75M $24.94M ELA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.5x 34.5x -5.9x ELA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.4x — 21.0x ELA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +47.7% — +4.4% ELA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.6% — -0.9% ELA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +10.6% +2.2% -39.3% ELA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +19.2%/yr — -36.2%/yr ELA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 69.9% 64.9% 61.2% BRLT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 84/100 — 35/100 ELA

Percentile Scorecard

ELABMHLBRLT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisELABMHLBRLT
Valuation 72 #14 of 48 8 #105 of 114 62 #19 of 48
Growth 96 #3 of 46 – 4 #44 of 46
Profitability 75 #12 of 45 – 23 #35 of 45
Financial Health 92 #5 of 52 46 #69 of 126 51 #26 of 52
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 84 – 35
  • ELA ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • BMHL ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • BRLT ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodELABMHLBRLTSPY
1 month -10.7%-26.6%+2.8% -5.9%
3 months -40.0%-41.3%+21.5% -4.6%
6 months -53.5%-10.5%+4.3% +0.2%
Year to date -19.2%-0.6%-16.0% +7.5%
1 year +10.6%+2.2%-39.3% +8.2%
3 years +177.9%—-50.3% +68.3%
3 years, per year +40.6%—-20.8% +19.0%
5 years +140.2%—-89.4% +56.5%
5 years, per year +19.2%—-36.2% +9.4%
10 years +1,114.6%—— +251.5%
10 years, per year +28.4%—— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureELABMHLBRLTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 69.9%64.9%61.2% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 62.7%73.9%64.6% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.330.210.78 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.150.03-0.64 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.6%-51.1%-94.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -62.6%-46.3%-47.5% -5.9%
52-week high $28.88$6.16$2.80 $779.14
52-week low $9.77$3.01$1.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleELABMHLBRLT
P/E now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 17.1x 34.5xmedian 21.1x -6.0xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 0.8x 10,401xmedian 0.9x 0.3xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 10.6x —median 11.7x -18,489xmedian 10.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 11.6x -17,222xmedian 15.3x 22.1xmedian 11.6x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 2.4x 7,503xmedian 2.3x 2.0xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.62median 0.57 —median 0.88 0.07median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsELABMHLBRLT
Revenue $293.04M – $451.83M
Gross profit $63.57M – $257.59M
Operating income $28.05M – -$6.53M
Net income $22.37M – -$6.56M
Free cash flow $24.03M – $6.81M
EPS (diluted) $0.86 – $-0.04
Cash & equivalents $43.44M $939.29 $76.18M
Total debt $9.67M $912.75K –
Shares (diluted) 25.96M 25.09M 102.10M
Enterprise value $154.10M $72.24M -$263.84M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricELABMHLBRLT
P/E 12.5x 34.5x -6.0x
P/FCF 11.7x -17,222x 22.1x
P/Operating cash flow 10.8x – 13.7x
P/S 1.0x 10,401x 0.3x
P/B 3.5x 7,503x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 3.6x 7,503x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 8.2x – -18,489x
EV/EBIT 8.8x – -11.3x
EV/Revenue 0.8x – 0.2x
EV/FCF 10.3x – 10.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.5x – 6.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.62 – 0.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricELABMHLBRLT
Revenue growth (1Y) 47.7% – 4.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.8% – 0.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 35.4% – 1.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.5% – 1.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 172.8% – -121.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 31.3% – -39.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 162.2% – -170.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 18.8% – -39.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 162.4% – -62.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 20.3% – -79.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 137.7% – -34.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 59.4% – -19.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 216.8% – -43.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 68.4% – -4.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricELABMHLBRLT
Gross margin 21.7% – 57.0%
EBITDA margin 10.2% – 0.0%
Operating margin 9.6% – -1.4%
Pretax margin 9.8% – 1.3%
Net margin 7.6% – -0.9%
FCF margin 8.2% – 1.5%
Operating cash flow margin 8.8% – 2.4%
Return on equity 28.7% – -8.9%
Return on assets 20.7% – -3.3%
Return on invested capital 25.0% – –
Return on capital employed 31.3% – -6.0%
Asset turnover 2.7x – 2.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x – -1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricELABMHLBRLT
Debt / assets 9.0% 7,223% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 82.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.1x – –
Debt / FCF 0.4x – –
Liabilities / assets 25.9% 12.7% 62.3%
Equity / assets 74.1% 87.3% 37.7%
Interest coverage 79.8x – –
Current ratio 4.2x – 1.6x
Quick ratio 2.5x – 0.9x
Cash ratio 2.4x – 0.9x
Altman Z-score 10.83 – 3.21

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricELABMHLBRLT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusELABMHLBRLT
Forward P/E 15.4xFY2026 – 21.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.70FY2026 – $0.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +25.0%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -12.9% – +57.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $258.05MFY2026 – $433.54MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.1%FY2026 – -0.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.9% – +19.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersELABMHLBRLT
Held by institutions 19.3% – 4.2%
Institutions holding 95 – 36
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.1% – -4.5%
Institutions buying 63 – 16
Institutions selling 22 – 8
Buyers to sellers 2.86 – 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ELABMHLBRLT
ELA 1.00 0.04 -0.02
BMHL 0.04 1.00 0.01
BRLT -0.02 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ELA, BMHL and BRLT?

Envela (ELA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Envela (ELA) $278.73M, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) $82.75M, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) $24.94M.

Which stock is cheaper, ELA, BMHL and BRLT?

Envela (ELA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Envela (ELA) 12.5x, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) 34.5x, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) -5.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Envela (ELA) is cheapest (Envela (ELA) 15.4x, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) 21.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Envela (ELA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Envela (ELA) +47.7%, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) +4.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Envela (ELA) has the highest net margin (Envela (ELA) 7.6%, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) -0.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Envela (ELA) returned the most: Envela (ELA) +10.6%, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) +2.2%, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) -39.3%. Over five years, Envela (ELA) compounded fastest (Envela (ELA) +19.2%/yr, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) -36.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) has been the steadiest (Envela (ELA) 69.9%, Bluemount Holdings (BMHL) 64.9%, Brilliant Earth (BRLT) 61.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ELA, BMHL and BRLT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Envela (ELA) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.