EFXT vs SLB vs USAC Stock Comparison

Enerflex, Slb and USA Compression Partners Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FLOC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
EFXT Enerflex Ltd.
$24.00 +1.8% 1M +88.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.92B
P/E
48.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.21B
Div. yield
0.67%
Oilfield Equipment Energy
5 wins
SLB Slb Limited/Nv
$54.08 +4.9% 1M +49.6% 1Y
Market cap
$80.26B
P/E
26.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$36.37B
Div. yield
2.14%
Oilfield Services Energy
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

USA Compression Partners leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (USA Compression Partners 6, Enerflex 5, Slb 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEFXTSLBUSACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.92B $80.26B $3.67B SLB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 48.3x 26.0x 25.4x USAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.9x 21.5x 20.4x EFXT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +2.5% +19.9% USAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.8% 8.5% 12.3% USAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.8% 9.5% 9.9% USAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 1.2x 4.3x EFXT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.67% 2.14% 8.35% USAC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +88.5% +49.6% +13.0% EFXT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.9%/yr +10.2%/yr +9.2%/yr EFXT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.1% 36.6% 28.1% USAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 59/100 58/100 EFXT

Percentile Scorecard

EFXTSLBUSAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEFXTSLBUSAC
Valuation 78 #11 of 47 28 #34 of 47 35 #31 of 47
Growth 95 #3 of 43 45 #24 of 43 93 #4 of 43
Profitability 87 #6 of 40 85 #7 of 40 100 #1 of 40
Financial Health 36 #29 of 45 57 #20 of 45 9 #41 of 45
Shareholder Returns 26 #24 of 32 81 #7 of 32 55 #15 of 32
Overall 65 59 58
  • EFXT ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • SLB ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • USAC ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEFXTSLBUSACSPY
1 month +1.8%+4.9%-0.8% -0.2%
3 months +10.7%+8.2%-1.9% +3.9%
6 months -5.6%-2.8%-6.8% +8.2%
Year to date +55.5%+40.9%+10.1% +12.9%
1 year +88.5%+49.6%+13.0% +12.3%
3 years +491.1%-3.1%+2.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +80.9%-1.1%+0.7% +23.3%
5 years +180.7%+62.4%+55.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +22.9%+10.2%+9.2% +10.9%
10 years +117.2%-32.1%+33.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year +8.1%-3.8%+2.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEFXTSLBUSACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.1%36.6%28.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.8%33.4%28.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.880.740.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.801.350.46 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.6%-48.9%-25.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.5%-10.0%-16.4% -1.2%
52-week high $28.39$60.12$30.30 $779.14
52-week low $12.53$35.19$21.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEFXTSLBUSAC
P/E now vs peer median 48.3xmedian 26.1x 26.0xmedian 26.1x 25.4xmedian 26.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.3x 2.2xmedian 1.3x 3.1xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 8.8x 12.0xmedian 8.8x 9.7xmedian 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 14.9x 16.7xmedian 14.9x 11.9xmedian 14.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.7x 2.9xmedian 1.7x 12.8xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.28median 0.49 -2.89median 0.49 0.13median 0.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEFXTSLBUSAC
Revenue $2.21B $36.37B $1.18B
Gross profit $525.36M $6.01B $772.78M
Operating income $206.78M $4.68B $352.30M
Net income $185.99M $3.15B $146.24M
Free cash flow $444.07M $4.81B $309.81M
R&D – $692.00M –
EPS (diluted) $0.50 $2.06 $0.99
Cash & equivalents $74.00M $2.74B $9.48M
Total debt $529.00M $12.80B $2.94B
Shares (diluted) 123.06M 1.51B 145.62M
Enterprise value $2.61B $77.37B $3.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEFXTSLBUSAC
P/E 48.3x 26.0x 25.4x
P/FCF 6.6x 16.7x 11.9x
P/Operating cash flow 6.9x 12.3x 8.2x
P/S 1.3x 2.2x 3.1x
P/B 2.5x 2.9x 12.8x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 3.6x 33.3x
EV/EBITDA 5.2x 12.0x 9.7x
EV/EBIT 16.3x 19.0x 18.7x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 2.4x 5.6x
EV/FCF 7.6x 18.5x 21.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.0x 13.6x 14.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.28 -2.89 0.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEFXTSLBUSAC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 2.5% 19.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.3% 5.3% 15.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -15.3% 18.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.6% -0.2% 14.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -16.5% 18.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 84.6% -2.2% 21.9%
Net income growth (1Y) – -25.2% 55.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 65.2% -7.6% 40.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -46.0% -31.3% 50.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 37.7% -9.0% 197.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -1.6% 25.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 243.8% 8.5% 19.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 0.1% 19.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 219.7% 21.2% 68.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEFXTSLBUSAC
Gross margin 23.8% 16.5% 65.7%
EBITDA margin 29.5% 20.5% 57.8%
Operating margin 9.4% 12.9% 30.0%
Pretax margin 14.8% 10.8% 13.5%
Net margin 2.8% 8.5% 12.3%
FCF margin 20.1% 13.2% 26.3%
Operating cash flow margin 19.0% 18.0% 38.0%
Return on equity 10.3% 11.5% 48.4%
Return on assets 4.2% 5.7% 3.9%
Return on invested capital 8.8% 9.5% 9.9%
Return on capital employed 11.5% 11.4% 10.2%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 2.1x 3.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 0.9% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEFXTSLBUSAC
Debt / assets 18.9% 23.0% 79.8%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.5x 10.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 1.2x 4.3x
Debt / FCF 1.2x 2.7x 9.5x
Liabilities / assets 58.3% 50.9% 92.2%
Equity / assets 41.7% 49.1% 7.8%
Interest coverage 0.2x 9.1x 1.8x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.4x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.9x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.3x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 2.28 3.24 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEFXTSLBUSAC
Dividend yield 0.7% 2.1% 8.3%
Net buyback yield – 1.1% –
Shareholder yield 0.7% 3.2% 8.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 189.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 89.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 4.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 2.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEFXTSLBUSAC
Forward P/E 18.9xFY2026 21.5xFY2026 20.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.27FY2026 $2.52FY2026 $1.24FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +144.2%FY2026 -14.0%FY2026 +45.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +37.8% +17.1% +24.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.39BFY2026 $38.38BFY2026 $1.46BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.1%FY2026 +7.5%FY2026 +46.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.6% +0.5% -3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEFXTSLBUSAC
Held by institutions – 89.8% 37.0%
Institutions holding – 1,698 130
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.6% +0.4%
Institutions buying – 783 63
Institutions selling – 663 26
Buyers to sellers – 1.18 2.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EFXTSLBUSAC
EFXT 1.00 0.25 0.28
SLB 0.25 1.00 0.30
USAC 0.28 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EFXT, SLB and USAC?

Slb (SLB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Enerflex (EFXT) $2.92B, Slb (SLB) $80.26B, USA Compression Partners (USAC) $3.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, EFXT, SLB and USAC?

USA Compression Partners (USAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Enerflex (EFXT) 48.3x, Slb (SLB) 26.0x, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 25.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Enerflex (EFXT) is cheapest (Enerflex (EFXT) 18.9x, Slb (SLB) 21.5x, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 20.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

USA Compression Partners (USAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Slb (SLB) +2.5%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) +19.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

USA Compression Partners (USAC) has the highest net margin (Enerflex (EFXT) 2.8%, Slb (SLB) 8.5%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 12.3%). On return on invested capital, USA Compression Partners (USAC) leads (Enerflex (EFXT) 8.8%, Slb (SLB) 9.5%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 9.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Enerflex (EFXT) returned the most: Enerflex (EFXT) +88.5%, Slb (SLB) +49.6%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) +13.0%. Over five years, Enerflex (EFXT) compounded fastest (Enerflex (EFXT) +22.9%/yr, Slb (SLB) +10.2%/yr, USA Compression Partners (USAC) +9.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

USA Compression Partners (USAC) has the highest dividend yield: Enerflex (EFXT) 0.67%, Slb (SLB) 2.14%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 8.35%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, USA Compression Partners (USAC) has been the steadiest (Enerflex (EFXT) 49.1%, Slb (SLB) 36.6%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 28.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EFXT, SLB and USAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, USA Compression Partners (USAC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.